速来查阅！美国注册会计师和国际注册会计师互免吗

发布时间：2020-04-24

美国注册会计师和国际注册会计师作为两个不同的会计师体系，有一些小伙伴会问国际注册会计师和ACCA有互免政策吗？这两个证书是存在互免政策的关系的，具体免考注意事项是怎样的呢？我们一起来看看吧。

可以免考。免考ACCA：如果你已经通过了USCPA的四门课程的考试，无需持证，你将获得ACCA的F1-F6、F8-F9课程的免试资格。

免考注意事项

1、在校生只有顺利通过整学年的课程才能够申请免试。

2、针对在校生的部分课程免试政策只适用于会计学专业全日制大学本科的在读学生，而不适用于硕士学位或大专学历的在读学生。

3、已完成MPAcc学位大纲规定课程，还需完成论文的学员也可注册并申请免试。

4、须提交由学校出具的通过所有MPAcc学位大纲规定课程的成绩单，并附注“该学员已通过所有MPAcc学位大纲规定课程，论文待完成”的说明。

5、特许学位(即海外大学与中国本地大学合作而授予海外大学学位的项目)—部分完成时不能申请免试。

6、政策适用于在中国教育部认可的高等院校全部完成或部分完成本科课程的学生，而不考虑目前居住地点。

有很多小伙伴对于ACCA还不太了解，那么ACCA究竟是什么？

ACCA（特许公认会计师公会）是全球广受认可的国际专业会计师组织，为全世界有志投身于财会、金融以及管理领域的专才提供首选的资格认证。一贯坚持最高的标准，提高财会人员的专业素质，职业操守以及监管能力，并秉承为公众利益服务的原则。

ACCA是国际认可范围最高的财务人员资格证书，是世界上领先的专业会计师团体，也是国际学员最多、学员规模发展最快的专业会计师组织。ACCA 目前在大中华区拥有 26,000名会员及 133,000 名学员和准会员，并在北京、上海、广州、深圳、成都、沈阳、青岛、武汉、长沙、香港和澳门共设有 11个办公室。 ACCA 为全球 179 个国家的 219,000 名会员及 527,000 名学员和准会员提供支持，帮助他们具备雇主所需的技能，从而在财会行业及商界建立成功的职业生涯。ACCA 通过全球 110 个办公室，以及全球 7,571 家认可雇主和 328 家认可教育合作伙伴，提供高标准的学习与发展服务。 ACCA 致力于维护公共利益，提倡适度的会计监管方式。

又到了与大家说再见的时候了，以上就是今天51题库考试学习网为大家分享的全部内容，大家是否清楚了呢？如有其他疑问请继续关注51题库考试学习网！

下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题，供大家学习参考。

(c) insider dealing. (5 marks)

正确答案：
(c) Insider dealing
Explanation of term
Insider dealing means using ‘inside information’ (i.e. price-sensitive information relating to the issuer of securities) to gain
advantage when ‘dealing’ (i.e. acquiring or disposing) in securities.
Ethical risks
Insider dealing is a potential area of conflict and contention for accountants in industry and commerce (i.e. employed
professional accountants) in particular (because of their exposure to price-sensitive information).
Acts of insider dealing contravene the fundamental principles of integrity and confidentiality:
■ integrity – a professional accountant should be honest;
■ confidentiality – a professional accountant should respect the confidentiality of information acquired during the course
of performing professional services and should not use or disclose it without proper and specific authority.
Professional accountants in public practice who become privy to price-sensitive information will similarly be in breach of their
duties of integrity and confidentiality if they get involved in insider dealing. Also, the reputation of individual practitioners and
their firms may be put at risk by allegations of insider dealing even though they have no involvement with the practice. For
example, if an auditor does not detect when an entity’s management is involved in insider dealing.
Sufficiency of current ethical guidance
Relevant current ethical guidance, that is covered by the principles of integrity and confidentiality, is sufficient to explain the
ethical risks of insider dealing but cannot prevent its practice. Even where there are laws to prosecute insider dealing,
penalties (such as seven years in jail and/or unlimited fines) have been ineffective in combating insider dealing.

(d) Corporate annual reports contain both mandatory and voluntary disclosures.

Required:

(i) Distinguish, using examples, between mandatory and voluntary disclosures in the annual reports of

public listed companies. (6 marks)

正确答案：
(d) (i) Mandatory and voluntary disclosures
Mandatory disclosures
These are components of the annual report mandated by law, regulation or accounting standard.
Examples include (in most jurisdictions) statement of comprehensive income (income or profit and loss statement),
statement of financial position (balance sheet), cash flow statement, statement of changes in equity, operating segmental
information, auditors’ report, corporate governance disclosure such as remuneration report and some items in the
directors’ report (e.g. summary of operating position). In the UK, the business review is compulsory.
Voluntary disclosures
These are components of the annual report not mandated in law or regulation but disclosed nevertheless. They are
typically mainly narrative rather than numerical in nature.
Examples include (in most jurisdictions) risk information, operating review, social and environmental information, and
the chief executive’s review.

4 At an academic conference, a debate took place on the implementation of corporate governance practices in

developing countries. Professor James West from North America argued that one of the key needs for developing

countries was to implement rigorous systems of corporate governance to underpin investor confidence in businesses

in those countries. If they did not, he warned, there would be no lasting economic growth as potential foreign inward

investors would be discouraged from investing.

In reply, Professor Amy Leroi, herself from a developing country, reported that many developing countries are

discussing these issues at governmental level. One issue, she said, was about whether to adopt a rules-based or a

principles-based approach. She pointed to evidence highlighting a reduced number of small and medium sized initial

public offerings in New York compared to significant growth in London. She suggested that this change could be

attributed to the costs of complying with Sarbanes-Oxley in the United States and that over-regulation would be the

last thing that a developing country would need. She concluded that a principles-based approach, such as in the

United Kingdom, was preferable for developing countries.

Professor Leroi drew attention to an important section of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to illustrate her point. The key

requirement of that section was to externally report on – and have attested (verified) – internal controls. This was, she

argued, far too ambitious for small and medium companies that tended to dominate the economies of developing

countries.

Professor West countered by saying that whilst Sarbanes-Oxley may have had some problems, it remained the case

that it regulated corporate governance in the ‘largest and most successful economy in the world’. He said that rules

will sometimes be hard to follow but that is no reason to abandon them in favour of what he referred to as ‘softer’

approaches.

(a) There are arguments for both rules and principles-based approaches to corporate governance.

Required:

(i) Describe the essential features of a rules-based approach to corporate governance; (3 marks)

正确答案：
(a) (i) Describe rules-based
In a rules-based jurisdiction, corporate governance provisions are legally binding and enforceable in law.
Non-compliance is punishable by fines or ultimately (in extremis) by delisting and director prosecutions.
There is limited latitude for interpretation of the provisions to match individual circumstances (‘one size fits all’). Some
have described this as a ‘box ticking’ exercise as companies seek to comply despite some provisions applying to their
individual circumstances more than others.
Investor confidence is underpinned by the quality of the legislation rather than the degree of compliance (which will be
total for the most part).

声明：本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传，本网站不拥有所有权，未作人工编辑处理，也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容，欢迎发送邮件至：contact@51tk.com 进行举报，并提供相关证据，工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你，一经查实，本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。

站内搜索
热门标签