国内报考ACCA的人有多少，本篇文章为你详细解答！

发布时间：2020-03-31

在日渐经济化的现在，很多大学生在校期间都开始学习国际证书，其中ACCA则是会计领域最具影响力的证书之一。那么，很多人会问：在国内报考ACCA的人又有多少呢？不防跟随51题库考试学习网来看看以下的数据吧。

ACCA官网最新的一份报告中显示：ACCA在全球178个国家收获了20000+名会员，500000+名在学学员；分支机构达到100家与全球世界范围内98个会计师组织达成合作关系，7500多家认可雇主深度合作，全球299家认可培训机构帮助学员顺利通过考试。

ACCA成员分布最广泛的是在英国本土，总数达到157,196名。其次是中国大陆以及香港地区。香港地区的ACCA会员人数达到18000多人，是大陆地区的3倍之多。中国大陆地区的学员数量占比庞大。

中国大陆ACCA会员和学员数量统计

在英国有79,672名ACCA学员，毋庸置疑是学员最多的国家。中国以63,377名学员位居第二，马来西亚有42,017名学员位居第三，就连新加坡这样的岛国也有18,266名学员，可见ACCA在亚洲环太平洋国家的影响力是多么的广泛。

在东欧国家俄罗斯、波兰、罗马尼亚、斯洛伐克等地的ACCA学员也有29797名，会员人数9310人。

在北美+南美洲一共有19328名ACCA学员10169名会员，主要分布在美国与加拿大地区。中东国家的ACCA学员数量也是出乎意料的多，在巴基斯坦就有37635名ACCA学员，试想一下中国有这么多大学生也才6万多人学习ACCA。

尼日利亚是非洲地区学员最多的国家，一共有18301名学员。毛里求斯、津巴布韦、乌干达也有很多的学生学习ACCA。

ACCA考试共有15门，我们必须考过13门才可以申请ACCA会员。很多人担心ACCA科目太多一时半会儿考不完，为此，ACCA为缩短考试周期，设置了一年四考政策，即每年设置四个考试季，可供学员灵活地参加考试。

1、考试时间：

分季机考和笔试一样，都是在3月、6月、9月及12月的考试季进行。这两种方式的考试无论是考点还是判卷标准都是一样的。

目前，ACCA很多科目的考试都已开启机考通道。无论是提高考试便捷程度，还是帮助学员提高就业技能，机考都是一种颇为有益的考试形式。

2、分季机考报名时间

 分季机考和笔试一样，共分为三个报名时段，分别为早、中、晚报考时段。

今日分享时间到此结束啦，如果大家觉得意犹未尽，还想了解更多内容的话，敬请关注51题库考试学习网。

下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题，供大家学习参考。

(ii) Advise Clifford of the capital gains tax implications of the alternative of selling the Oxford house and

garden by means of two separate disposals as proposed. Calculations are not required for this part of

the question. (3 marks)

正确答案：
(ii) The implications of selling the Oxford house and garden in two separate disposals
The additional sales proceeds would result in an increase in Clifford’s capital gains and consequently his tax liability.
When computing the gain on the sale of the house together with a small part of the garden, the allowable cost would
be a proportion of the original cost. That proportion would be A/A + B where A is the value of the house and garden
that has been sold and B is the value of the part of the garden that has been retained. Principal private residence relief
and taper relief would be available in the same way as that set out in (i) above.
When computing the gain on the sale of the remainder of the garden, the cost would be the original cost of the property
less the amount used in computing the gain on the earlier disposal. Principal private residence relief would not be
available as the land sold is not a dwelling house or part of one.

(iv) critiques the performance measurement system at TSC. (5 marks

正确答案：
(iv) The performance measurement system used by TSC appears simplistic. However, it may be considered to be measuring
the right things since the specific measures used cover a range of dimensions designed to focus the organisation on
factors thought to be central to corporate success, and not confined to traditional financial measures.
Internal benchmarking is used at TSC in order to provide sets of absolute standards that all depots are expected to attain.
This should help to ensure that there is a continual focus upon the adoption of ‘best practice’ at all depots. Benchmarks
on delivery performance place an emphasis upon quality of service whereas benchmarks on profitability are focused
solely upon profitability!
Incentive schemes are used throughout the business, linking the achievement of company targets with financial rewards.
It might well be the case that the profit incentive would act as a powerful motivator to each depot management team.
However, what is required for the prosperity of TSC is a focus of management on the determinants of success as opposed
to the results of success.
(Alternative relevant discussion would be acceptable)

3 Johan, a public limited company, operates in the telecommunications industry. The industry is capital intensive with

heavy investment in licences and network infrastructure. Competition in the sector is fierce and technological

advances are a characteristic of the industry. Johan has responded to these factors by offering incentives to customers

and, in an attempt to acquire and retain them, Johan purchased a telecom licence on 1 December 2006 for

$120 million. The licence has a term of six years and cannot be used until the network assets and infrastructure are

ready for use. The related network assets and infrastructure became ready for use on 1 December 2007. Johan could

not operate in the country without the licence and is not permitted to sell the licence. Johan expects its subscriber

base to grow over the period of the licence but is disappointed with its market share for the year to 30 November

2008. The licence agreement does not deal with the renewal of the licence but there is an expectation that the

regulator will grant a single renewal for the same period of time as long as certain criteria regarding network build

quality and service quality are met. Johan has no experience of the charge that will be made by the regulator for the

renewal but other licences have been renewed at a nominal cost. The licence is currently stated at its original cost of

$120 million in the statement of financial position under non-current assets.

Johan is considering extending its network and has carried out a feasibility study during the year to 30 November

2008. The design and planning department of Johan identified five possible geographical areas for the extension of

its network. The internal costs of this study were $150,000 and the external costs were $100,000 during the year

to 30 November 2008. Following the feasibility study, Johan chose a geographical area where it was going to install

a base station for the telephone network. The location of the base station was dependent upon getting planning

permission. A further independent study has been carried out by third party consultants in an attempt to provide a

preferred location in the area, as there is a need for the optimal operation of the network in terms of signal quality

and coverage. Johan proposes to build a base station on the recommended site on which planning permission has

been obtained. The third party consultants have charged $50,000 for the study. Additionally Johan has paid

$300,000 as a single payment together with $60,000 a month to the government of the region for access to the land

upon which the base station will be situated. The contract with the government is for a period of 12 years and

commenced on 1 November 2008. There is no right of renewal of the contract and legal title to the land remains with

the government.

Johan purchases telephone handsets from a manufacturer for $200 each, and sells the handsets direct to customers

for $150 if they purchase call credit (call card) in advance on what is called a prepaid phone. The costs of selling the

handset are estimated at $1 per set. The customers using a prepaid phone pay $21 for each call card at the purchase

date. Call cards expire six months from the date of first sale. There is an average unused call credit of $3 per card

after six months and the card is activated when sold.

Johan also sells handsets to dealers for $150 and invoices the dealers for those handsets. The dealer can return the

handset up to a service contract being signed by a customer. When the customer signs a service contract, the

customer receives the handset free of charge. Johan allows the dealer a commission of $280 on the connection of a

customer and the transaction with the dealer is settled net by a payment of $130 by Johan to the dealer being the

cost of the handset to the dealer ($150) deducted from the commission ($280). The handset cannot be sold

separately by the dealer and the service contract lasts for a 12 month period. Dealers do not sell prepaid phones, and

Johan receives monthly revenue from the service contract.

The chief operating officer, a non-accountant, has asked for an explanation of the accounting principles and practices

which should be used to account for the above events.

Required:

Discuss the principles and practices which should be used in the financial year to 30 November 2008 to account

for:

(a) the licences; (8 marks)

正确答案：
Licences
An intangible asset meets the identifiability criterion when it is separable or it arises from contractual or other legal rights (IAS38
‘Intangible Assets’). Additionally intangible assets are recognised where it is probable that the future economic benefits attributable
to the asset will flow to the entity and the asset’s cost can be reliably measured. Where intangible assets are acquired separately,
the asset’s cost or fair value reflects the estimations of the future economic benefits that are expected to flow to the entity. The
licence will, therefore, meet the above criteria for recognition as an intangible asset at cost. Subsequent to initial recognition,
IAS38 permits an entity to adopt the cost or revaluation model as its accounting policy. The revaluation model can only be adopted
if intangible assets are traded in an active market. As the licence cannot be sold, the revaluation model cannot be used.
The cost model requires intangible assets to be carried at cost less amortisation and impairment losses (IAS38, para 74).
Amortisation is the systematic allocation of the depreciable amount of an intangible asset over its useful life. The depreciable
amount is the asset’s cost less its residual value. The licence will have no residual value. The depreciable amount should be
allocated on a systematic basis over its useful life. The method of amortisation should reflect the pattern in which the asset’s
economic benefits are expected to be consumed. If that pattern cannot be determined reliably, the straight line method of
amortisation must be used. The licence does not suffer wear and tear from usage, that is the number of customers using the
service. The economic benefits of the licence relate to Johan’s ability to benefit from the use of the licence. The economic benefits
relates to the passage of time and the useful life of the licence is now shorter. Therefore, the asset depletes on a time basis and
the straight line basis is appropriate. The licence should be amortised from the date that the network is available for use; that is
from 1 December 2007. An impairment review should have been undertaken at 30 November 2007 when the licence was not
being amortised. Although the licence is capable of being used on the date it was purchased, it cannot be used until the associated
network assets and infrastructure are available for use. Johan expects the regulator to renew the licence at the end of the initial
term and thus consideration should be given to amortising the licence over the two licence periods, i.e. a period of 11 years (five
years and six years) as the licence could be renewed at a nominal cost. However, Johan has no real experience of renewing licences
and cannot reliably determine what amounts, if any, would be payable to the regulator. Therefore, the licence should be amortised
over a five year period, that is $24 million per annum.
There are indications that the value of the licence may be impaired. The market share for the year to 30 November 2008 is
disappointing and competition is fierce in the sector, and retention of customers difficult. Therefore, an impairment test should be
undertaken. Johan should classify the licence and network assets as a single cash generating unit (CGU) for impairment purposes.
The licence cannot generate revenue in its own right and the smallest group of assets that generates independent revenue will be
the licence and network assets. The impairment indicators point to the need to test this cash generating unit for impairment.

声明：本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传，本网站不拥有所有权，未作人工编辑处理，也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容，欢迎发送邮件至：contact@51tk.com 进行举报，并提供相关证据，工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你，一经查实，本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。

站内搜索
热门标签