上海市考生:ACCA证书是什么样的证书?ACCA证书在国内受到认可吗?

发布时间:2020-01-10


很多小伙伴都听说了ACCA证书的含金量是十分高的,想必大家对ACCA考试的了解也不算太多吧,下面是51题库考试学习网为大家收集到的一部分信息,希望对大家有帮助:

首先,何为ACCA呢?

(1)ACCA全称为The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants,是由国际性的会计师组织英国特许公认会计师公会设立的证书,国内也被称为国际注册会计师,是全球的财会金融领域的证书之一,更是国际认可的财务人员资格证书。

(2)ACCA考试科目内容

ACCA证书培养目标是培养综合性的高级财务管理人才。ACCA证书一共包括13门考试科目,这些考试科目的设置从财务基础到高级的管理课程层层递进,由浅入深,即使是没有财务基础的人也能够轻松入门,授课内容和考试语言为英语,因此难度相对于本土证书的考试难度会有一定的提升。

(3)持有ACCA证书的就业前景

毋容置疑,ACCA的就业前景是十分良好的,光从持有人少和通过率低这两点来看。ACCA作为财会界含金量最高的证书之一,在全球企业中都有极高的认可度,在国内与超过400家认证雇主保持密切合作,使ACCA学员在就业时会获得优先录取的机会。另外持有ACCA证书的学生进入四大会计师事务所时会被优先考虑,还会有除了工资外的Q-pay。目前中国ACCA人才缺口达到了20多万,所以ACCA学习人数正在逐步扩大,许多顶尖的财经院校也开始开设ACCA专业。

根据我国跟英国的协定,只要是在英国的正规院校毕业回国的,且是中英两个国家都认可的,是可以办理国外学历认证的。不过前提是,英国的院校一定是要在我国教育部进行了备案的。

ACCA资格认证在中国被称为“国际注册会计师”,实际上全称应该叫做“特许公认会计师公会”,中国企业对于熟悉国际会计准则并获国际认可的高级财务人才需求将越来越旺盛。

ACCA在中国得到了充分的认可

目前,ACCA在中国大陆的学员已达13,000多人,会员已达2000多人。ACCA现在北京、上海、广州、南京、天津、武汉、深圳、西安和厦门等城市设有考点,并与当地在财会方面有较强师资力量的大学或专业会计培训机构合作,设立了培训中心,辅导学员参加考前培训。目前,举办ACCA培训班的主要大学和机构有:上海财经大学、天津财经学院、中南财经大学、暨南大学、国家审计署干部培训中心、对外经济贸易大学、南京审计学院、西安交通大学等。为配合中国事务的迅速发展,ACCA于1998年3月和5月及2001年年初分别在上海、北京和广州设立了办事处.

至于ACCA与中国的渊源要追溯到1988年,ACCA第一次派高级代表团访问中国的时候。就在那一年,ACCA在上海和北京设立了代表处,两年后ACCA正式进驻中国大陆。较早进入中国,直接结果就是ACCA早期会员已经成为了当今中国的企业财务经理、公司CFO,抑或政府财经部门的高官。这种先发优势的影响力不容小觑。

在中国虽然只有CICPA具备签字权,但是这种唯一性并不能否定其他资格认证考试的含金量和权威程度。ACCA早期会员如今在中国手里握着较大发言权,他们认可ACCA代表的含义,这点非常重要。

以上就是关于ACCA考试的相关信息,51题库考试学习网想告诉大家的是,天生我材必有用,一个人能力的大小不完全是由成功的大小来决定的,取决于的是你发挥能力,挖掘潜力过程中坚持不懈,永不放弃的精神,当然前提是你要自信,要去发现你的潜能。


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(d) Job rotation. (3 marks)

正确答案:
(d) Job rotation is an important training method and is often also seen as a means of motivation. It involves moving the trainee from one job to another and is therefore more suitable for lower level employees. The trainee is required to do different jobs in logical succession, thus broadening experience and gaining a picture of the organisation’s wider activities.

(b) (i) Explain the matters you should consider, and the evidence you would expect to find in respect of the

carrying value of the cost of investment of Dylan Co in the financial statements of Rosie Co; and

(7 marks)

正确答案:
(b) (i) Cost of investment on acquisition of Dylan Co
Matters to consider
According to the schedule provided by the client, the cost of investment comprises three elements. One matter to
consider is whether the cost of investment is complete.
It appears that no legal or professional fees have been included in the cost of investment (unless included within the
heading ‘cash consideration’). Directly attributable costs should be included per IFRS 3 Business Combinations, and
there is a risk that these costs may be expensed in error, leading to understatement of the investment.
The cash consideration of $2·5 million is the least problematical component. The only matter to consider is whether the
cash has actually been paid. Given that Dylan Co was acquired in the last month of the financial year it is possible that
the amount had not been paid before the year end, in which case the amount should be recognised as a current liability
on the statement of financial position (balance sheet). However, this seems unlikely given that normally control of an
acquired company only passes to the acquirer on cash payment.
IFRS 3 states that the cost of investment should be recognised at fair value, which means that deferred consideration
should be discounted to present value at the date of acquisition. If the consideration payable on 31 January 2009 has
not been discounted, the cost of investment, and the corresponding liability, will be overstated. It is possible that the
impact of discounting the $1·5 million payable one year after acquisition would be immaterial to the financial
statements, in which case it would be acceptable to leave the consideration at face value within the cost of investment.
Contingent consideration should be accrued if it is probable to be paid. Here the amount is payable if revenue growth
targets are achieved over the next four years. The auditor must therefore assess the probability of the targets being
achieved, using forecasts and projections of Maxwell Co’s revenue. Such information is inherently subjective, and could
have been manipulated, if prepared by the vendor of Maxwell Co, in order to secure the deal and maximise
consideration. Here it will be crucial to be sceptical when reviewing the forecasts, and the assumptions underlying the
data. The management of Rosie Co should have reached their own opinion on the probability of paying the contingent
consideration, but they may have relied heavily on information provided at the time of the acquisition.
Audit evidence
– Agreement of the monetary value and payment dates of the consideration per the client schedule to legal
documentation signed by vendor and acquirer.
– Agreement of $2·5 million paid to Rosie Co’s bank statement and cash book prior to year end. If payment occurs
after year end confirm that a current liability is recognised on the individual company and consolidated statement
of financial position (balance sheet).
– Board minutes approving the payment.
– Recomputation of discounting calculations applied to deferred and contingent consideration.
– Agreement that the discount rate used is pre-tax, and reflects current market assessment of the time value of money
(e.g. by comparison to Rosie Co’s weighted average cost of capital).
– Revenue and profit projections for the period until January 2012, checked for arithmetic accuracy.
– A review of assumptions used in the projections, and agreement that the assumptions are comparable with the
auditor’s understanding of Dylan Co’s business.
Tutorial note: As the scenario states that Chien & Co has audited Dylan Co for several years, it is reasonable to rely on
their cumulative knowledge and understanding of the business in auditing the revenue projections.

(c) Identify and evaluate other strategic options ONA could consider to address the airline’s current financial and

operational weaknesses.

Note: requirement (c) includes 2 professional marks (10 marks)

正确答案:

(c) Within the strategy clock, ONA might consider both differentiation and focus. A differentiation strategy seeks to provide
products or services that offer different benefits from those offered by competitors. These benefits are valued by customers
and so can lead to increased market share and, in the context of ONA, higher seat utilisation. Differentiation is particularly
attractive when it provides the opportunity of providing a price premium. In other words, margins are enhanced through
differentiation. Air travellers may be willing to pay more to travel with an airline that offers seat allocation and free in-flight
food and drinks.
However, such a broad-based differentiation strategy may be inappropriate for ONA because of the need to service both
business and leisure travellers. Consequently, the potential strategy also has to be considered in the context of the two sectors
that the company perceives that it services. In the regional sector a focused differentiation strategy looks particularly attractive.
Here, the strategy focuses on a selected niche or market segment. The most obvious focus is on business travel and building
the company’s strengths in this sector. This focus on the business traveller might be achieved through:
– Ensuring that flight times are appropriate for the business working day. This is already a perceived strength of the
company. This needs to be built on.
– Providing more space in the aircraft by changing the seating configuration – and the balance between business and
standard class. ONA currently has a low seat occupancy rate and a reduction in seat capacity could be borne.
– Fewer passengers in the aircraft may also lead to improved throughput times. Loading and unloading aircraft is quicker,
minimising the delays encountered by the traveller.
– Providing supporting business services – lounges with fax and internet facilities.
– Speeding the process of booking and embarkation (through electronic check-in), so making the process of booking and
embarkation easier and faster.
– Providing loyalty schemes that are aimed at the business traveller.
Although this focused differentiation is aimed at the business customer it is also likely that particular aspects of it will be
valued by certain leisure travellers. Given the strong regional brand (people from Oceania are likely to travel ONA) and the
nature of the leisure travel in this sector (families visiting relatives) it seems unlikely that there will be a significant fall off in
leisure travel in the regional sector.
In the international sector, the strategic customer is less clear. This sector is serving both the leisure and business market and
is also competing with strong ‘no frills’ competitors. The nature of customer and competition is different. A strategy of
differentiation could still be pursued, although perhaps general differentiation (without a price premium) may be more effective
with the aim of increasing seat occupancy rate. This sector would also benefit from most of the suggested improvements of
the regional sector – providing more space in aircraft, faster passenger throughput, electronic check-in etc. However, these
small changes will not address the relatively low flight frequency in this sector. This could be addressed through seeking
alliances with established airlines in the continental countries that it services. Simple code share agreements could double
ONA’s frequencies overnight. Obviously, ONA would be seeking a good cultural fit – the ‘no frills’ low-cost budget airlineswould not be candidates for code shares.

ONA’s perception of market segmentation, reflected in splitting regional from international travel and distinguishing leisure
from business appears to be a sensible understanding of the marketplace. However, it might also be useful for them to
consider on-line customers and commission customers (travel agents) as different segments. Perceiving travel agents as the
strategic customer would lead to a different strategic focus, one in which the amount and structure of commission played an
important part.
Finally, whichever strategy ONA adopts, it must continue to review its operational efficiency. An important strategic capability
in any organisation is to ensure that attention is paid to cost-efficiency. It can be argued that a continual reduction in costs
is necessary for any organisation in a competitive market. Management of costs is a threshold competence for survival. ONA
needs to address some of the weaknesses identified earlier in the question. Specific points, not covered elsewhere, include:
– Improved employee productivity to address the downward decline in efficiency ratios.
– Progressive standardisation of the fleet to produce economies of scale in maintenance and training. This should reduce
the cost base.
– Careful monitoring of expenditure, particularly on wages and salaries, to ensure that these do not exceed revenue
increases.
Candidates may address this question in a number of ways. In the model answer given above, the strategy clock is used –
as it uses the term ‘no frills’ in its definition and so it seems appropriate to look at other options within this structure. However,
answers that use other frameworks (such as Ansoff’s product/market matrix) are perfectly acceptable. Furthermore, answerswhich focus on the suitability, acceptability and feasibility of certain options are also acceptable.


声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。