上海市2021研究生报考条件要求有哪些?

发布时间:2020-01-17


每年关于研究生考试话题最热的莫过去报考条件,很多考研新秀辛苦备考一年却发现自己不符合报名条件,51题库考试学习网不希望这样的事情再发生,今天51题库考试学习网就为大家分享研究生的报考条件。

由于2021研究生考试的报考条件还没有公布,可以参考2020研究生考试的报考条件。

报名参加全国硕士研究生招生考试的人员,须符合下列报考条件:

(一)中华人民共和国公民。

(二)拥护中国共产党的领导,品德良好,遵纪守法。

(三)身体健康状况符合国家和招生单位规定的体检要求。

(四)考生学业水平须符合下列条件之一:

1、国家承认学历的应届本科毕业生(含普通高校、成人高校、普通高校举办的成人高等学历教育应届本科毕业生)及自学考试和网络远程教育届时可毕业本科生。考生录取当年入学前(具体期限由招生单位规定)须取得国家承认的本科毕业证书,否则录取资格无效。

2、具有国家承认的大学本科毕业学历的人员。

3、获得国家承认的高职高专毕业学历后满2年(从毕业后到录取当年入学之日,下同)或2年以上的人员,以及国家承认学历的本科结业生,符合招生单位根据本单位的培养目标对考生提出的具体学业要求的,按本科毕业同等学力身份报考。

4、已获硕士、博士学位的人员。在校研究生报考须在报名前征得所在培养单位同意。

(1) 大学专科生报考研究生,毕业两年达到同等学力需满足以下条件:

专科生取得国家承认的学力两年或者两年以上,并且达到与本科生同等学力的身份,才能报考研。国家承认的专科生学历包括电大、夜大、职大、函大和自学考试,这些都属于国家承认的专科生学历才可报考研究生考试。专科生需要达到的同等学力的情况不同,具体的需要根据你报考的院校情况而定。部分院校和专业有限制。一般需要满足的同等学力的条件包括:英语四级六级、学术论文等之类的。也就是说,专科生在毕业工作两年之后通过各种途径重新补上了国家承认的本科学历水平的程度,达到同等学力身份,才能考研。

以上就是51题库考试学习网为各位考生分享的研究生报考条件,各位考生对照看看你是哪种情况。51题库考试学习网预祝各位考生考试加油!


下面小编为大家准备了 研究生入学 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

根据思维任务的性质、内容和解决问题的方法可以将思维分为哪几类?( )

A.直观动作思维
B.形象思维
C.逻辑思维
D.分析思维
答案:A,B,C
解析:
直观动作思维是通过实际操作解决直观具体问题的思维活动。形象思维是人们利用头脑中的具体形象来解决问题的思维活动。逻辑思维是当人们面对理论性质的任务时,要用概念、理论知识来解决问题的思维活动。分析思维也叫逻辑思维,是指经过仔细研究、逐步分析,最后得出明确结论的思维方式。例如:警察通过线索、取证、对证等找出犯罪对象的思维;学生推理论证几何题的思维。但分析思维是思维分类的另一种方式,不是题中描述的方式,所以不选。要注意审题!

设总体X的概率密度为
  
  其中μ是已知参数,σ>0是未知参数,A是常数.X1,X2,…,Xn是来自总体X的简单随机样本.
  (Ⅰ)求A;
  (Ⅱ)求σ的最大似然估计量.

答案:
解析:


Text 3 England's problematic vocational education system has been subjected to wave after wave of reform.Yet improving the quality of technical education has eluded governments of all colours.University technical colleges(UTCs)are only the latest example of a shiny innovation that ran on to the rocks.Seven UTCs have now announced they are closing their doors.UTCs were intendecl to provide quality vocational education,combining technical and academic learning,for young people from the age of 14.Despite the millions the government has invested in them,ihey have on the whole been plagued by poor GCSE results and an inability to attract sufficient numbers of young people.Several attempts to establish quality vocational eclucation from 14 have failed.The issues affecting UTCs provide an opportunity to revisit whether this merits continuing support.We should take it.Barely a year passes without a lament about the low status of vocational qualifications.These often fail to recognise the chicken and egg that holds vocational learning back.Its status will only improve when ii is not seen as the preserve of those who have been failed by the school system.But while its status is low,these are the only young people likely to try something unproven and untested.This dynamic means new institutions often replicate the problems of the old seconclary moderns.Young people who attend UTCs are more likely to be from poor backgrounds,have made poor progress in primary school,and have attended secondary schools rated poorly by Ofsted.They are children who have been failed by the school system.In this day and age,there is no such thing as a career that does not require functional literacy and numeracy.Yet drawing low-achieving children out of mixed-ability schooling at age 14 makes them less likely to get the decent GCSEs in maths and English that are so critical in the eyes of employers.Setting up alternative vocational institutions for 14-year-olds thus risks closing down future vocational options,rather than expanding them.Vocational education is often posited as an alternative for those who are not"academically minded",orten a code for those who have disengaged from school.Yet this is far more likely to be a symptom of poor teaching ancl a lack of adequate support rather than a young person's inability to engage with a broad pre-16 curriculum that includes both academic and applied learning.Selection by academic ability at age 11 is wrong.But so i.s backdoor selection by academic ability at 14.The rlght to experience an engaging curriculum and finish school with adequate levels of literacy and numeracy is best achieved by options at 16 not 14.This wili not solve everything;but it is a better basis for ensuring 16-year-olds have the skills they need to flourish in any job.
We can learn that those who are not"academically minded"____

A.indicate poor teaching in the school system
B.lack the ability to engage with academic learning
C.blame inadequate support for their failure
D.fail to meet national educational standards
答案:A
解析:
[信息锁定]根据题干“没有‘学术头脑’者”定位至第五段。该段②句指出,这(t his)更有可能表明教学质量差、缺乏足够支持。this回指首句“与学校教育脱节”,再辅以首句“没有‘学术头脑’者是那些与学校教育脱节的学生的代号”可知,没有“学术头脑”者可能表明学校的教学质量差、缺乏足够支持,A.是对第五段文意的合理概括。[解题技巧]B.与②句“而不是年轻人没有能力参与到16岁前的全面课程(rather than.…)”相悖。C.由②句“缺乏足够支持”而来,但此乃作者评论,文中并未谈及“那些没有‘学术头脑者’对此的看法”。D.对②句a young person's inability to engage with a broad prr16 curriculum断章取义,忽视其前rather than“而不是”的驳斥作用。

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。