福建省考生：ACCA考试成绩有效期是多久？

发布时间：2020-01-10

当人生面对许多选择的时候，我们需要谨慎；当我们没有选择的时候，就把压力当挑战，给自己一个信心，近日，参加ACCA考试的小伙伴来咨询我一些关于ACCA考试成绩有效期的问题，接下来51题库考试学习网将一一为其解答，建议大家收藏起来哟~

ACCA F阶段（AB-FM）课程考试已正式取消考试期限，换句话说，已经考完的各F阶段科目的考试成绩永久有效，不必重新考试。

不过，对于ACCA核心课程（P阶段）的考试成绩还是设置了7年的有效期。每位学员必须在通过第一科战略课程之日起，7年内完成所有的P阶段科目考试。（超出规定年限就只能重新考试）

ACCA考完一般都需要多久？

ACCA每年有4次考季，每次最多可以报考4门，每年最多报考8门，而ACCA考试全科共需要通过13门考试，所以，全部都能一次通过考试的情况下，考完ACCA最快也要近两年的时间。

ACCA一般都能考多久呢？

以ACCA近年的考试通过率来看，在无免考的情况下，从F1-P阶段完成考试的时间大致是2年-3年的时间。当然，如果你有相应的免考机会，比如拥有CPA、MPAcc等证书的话则可以免除部分科目的考试。如此一来，就能大大缩短你通过考试的时间了。

ACCA免考政策如下：

教育部认可高校毕业生

1）会计学专业 - 获得学士或硕士学位（金融/财务管理/审计专业也享受等同会计学专业的免试政策，下同） 免试5门课程；（即是本科或者研究生毕业）

2）会计学 - 辅修专业 免试3门课程；（双学位的，且第二专业是会计的）

3）法律专业 免试1门课程；

4）商务及管理专业 免试1门课程；

5）MPAcc专业（获得MPAcc学位或完成MPAcc大纲规定的所有课程、只有论文待完成） 免试5门课程*；

6）MBA - 获得MBA学位 免试3门课程；

7）非相关专业 无免试课程。

*注：部分院校的MPAcc专业已专门申请ACCA总部的免试审核，因此有多于5门的免试，具体请查询 ACCA总部官网。

教育部认可高校在校生（本科）

1）会计学专业 - 完成第一学年课程 可以注册为ACCA正式学员 无免试；

2）会计学专业 - 完成第二学年课程 免试3门课程；

3）其他专业 - 在校生 ACCA全球网站查询。

中国注册会计师资格

1）CICPA - 2009年“6+1”制度前获得全科合格证或者会员资格证 免试5门课程；

2）CICPA - 2009年“6+1”制度后获得全科合格证或者会员资格证 免试9门课程；

3）FIA(Foundation in Accountancy) 通过FIA(Foundation in Accountancy)所有考试并取得相关工作经验 免试4门课程。

关于ACCA有效期的介绍

ACCA考试期限跟CPA一样实行轮废制，即需要在一定的时间里面考完规定的科目，否则成绩将会无效。那么这个时间怎么算的呢？

根据以前的规则，学员必须在首次报名注册后10年内通过所有考试，否则将注销其学员资格。后特许公认会计师公会ACCA对学员通过ACCA资格认证所有考试的时限做出了重要调整。F段成绩永久有效，P段要在7年内考完。根据新规则，专业阶段考试的时限将为7年。因此，国际财会基础资格(Foundations in Accountancy，简称FIA)的考试以及ACCA资格考试的基础阶段F1-F9考试将不再有通过时限。

“7年政策”意味着从你通过P阶段的第一门科目开始，7年内需完成P阶段所要求的所有ACCA考试科目。否则，从第8年开始，你第1年所考过的P阶段科目成绩将会被视为过期作废，须重新考试。

以上就是关于ACCA考试的相关信息，51题库考试学习网想告诉大家的是，其实一个证书好不好考并不是绝对的，这取决于你自己的努力程度。俗话说，有志者事竟成，相信只要通过自己的不懈努力，通过看似很困难的ACCA考试也不是太大的问题。

下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题，供大家学习参考。

Ms Huang, a shareholder of the Daqing Limited Liability Company (Daqing), found that the general manager, Mr Ding, had accepted bribes from several suppliers, which materially caused losses to Daqing, and adversely affected the interests of all shareholders.

Further examination, through a Certified Public Accountant firm, disclosed that there were a lot of affiliated transactions between Daqing and Everbright Co, which was the majority shareholder of Daqing. Mr Ding was recommended by Everbright Co and appointed by Daqing’s board of directors, which was substantially influenced by Everbright Co. With a series of such transactions Daqing transferred huge profits to Everbright Co and adversely affected Daqing.

Required:

(a) State whether Ms Huang was entitled to take legal action against Mr Ding for his illegal behaviour of accepting bribes which adversely affected all the shareholders. (2 marks)

(b) State TWO different legal actions Ms Huang was entitled to take to protect the rights of Daqing and its shareholders due to the affiliated transactions with Everbright Co. (4 marks)

正确答案：

(a) Mr Ding’s act of accepting bribery violated the criminal law and the relevant rules of the Company Law as well. Besides the criminal charges, he should be liable for his fraudulent behaviour of damaging the interests of Daqing and its shareholders. Therefore, Ms Huang was entitled to bring a law suit against general manager Mr Ding on the ground that his acts caused her loss of interests.

(b) With respect to Daqing’s damage, Ms Huang should first request the board of directors or supervisory board to take legal action against Everbright Co. Where these two bodies refuse to take reasonable actions, Ms Huang might, in her own name but for the interests of the company, bring a shareholder representative litigation against Everbright Co. On the other hand, she might also bring a direct litigation against Everbright Co on the ground that the connected transactions caused indirect damage to the shareholder’s interests.

(ii) State when the inheritance tax (IHT) calculated in (i) would be payable and by whom. (2 marks)

正确答案：
(ii) Inheritance tax administration
The tax on Debbie’s estate (personalty and realty) would be paid by the personal representatives, usually an executor.
Inheritance tax is due six months from the end of the month in which death occurred (31 December 2005) or the date
on which probate is obtained (if earlier). However, an instalment option is available for certain assets, which includes
land and buildings i.e. the residence whereby the tax can be paid in 10 equal annual instalments.

1 Stuart is a self-employed business consultant aged 58. He is married to Rebecca, aged 55. They have one child,

Sam, who is aged 24 and single.

In November 2005 Stuart sold a house in Plymouth for ￡422,100. Stuart had inherited the house on the death of

his mother on 1 May 1994 when it had a probate value of ￡185,000. The subsequent pattern of occupation was as

follows:

1 May 1994 to 28 February 1995 occupied by Stuart and Rebecca as main residence

1 March 1995 to 31 December 1998 unoccupied

1 January 1999 to 31 March 2001 let out (unfurnished)

1 April 2001 to 30 November 2001 occupied by Stuart and Rebecca

1 December 2001 to 30 November 2005 used occasionally as second home

Both Stuart and Rebecca had lived in London from March 1995 onwards. On 1 March 2001 Stuart and Rebecca

bought a house in London in their joint names. On 1 January 2002 they elected for their London house to be their

principal private residence with effect from that date, up until that point the Plymouth property had been their principal

private residence.

No other capital disposals were made by Stuart in the tax year 2005/06. He has ￡29,500 of capital losses brought

forward from previous years.

Stuart intends to invest the gross sale proceeds from the sale of the Plymouth house, and is considering two

investment options, both of which he believes will provide equal risk and returns. These are as follows:

(1) acquiring shares in Omikron plc; or

(2) acquiring further shares in Omega plc.

Notes:

1. Omikron plc is a listed UK trading company, with 50,250,000 shares in issue. Its shares currently trade at 42p

per share.

2. Stuart and Rebecca helped start up the company, which was then Omega Ltd. The company was formed on

1 June 1990, when they each bought 24,000 shares for ￡1 per share. The company became listed on 1 May

1997. On this date their holding was subdivided, with each of them receiving 100 shares in Omega plc for each

share held in Omega Ltd. The issued share capital of Omega plc is currently 10,000,000 shares. The share price

is quoted at 208p – 216p with marked bargains at 207p, 211p, and 215p.

Stuart and Rebecca’s assets (following the sale of the Plymouth house but before any investment of the proceeds) are

as follows:

Assets Stuart Rebecca

￡ ￡

Family house in London 450,000 450,000

Cash from property sale 422,100 –

Cash deposits 165,000 165,000

Portfolio of quoted investments – 250,000

Shares in Omega plc see above see above

Life insurance policy note 1 note 1

Note:

1. The life insurance policy will pay out a sum of ￡200,000 on the death of the first spouse to die.

Stuart has recently been diagnosed with a serious illness. He is expected to live for another two or three years only.

He is concerned about the possible inheritance tax that will arise on his death. Both he and Rebecca have wills whose

terms transfer all assets to the surviving spouse. Rebecca is in good health.

Neither Stuart nor Rebecca has made any previous chargeable lifetime transfers for the purposes of inheritance tax.

Required:

(a) Calculate the taxable capital gain on the sale of the Plymouth house in November 2005 (9 marks)

正确答案：

 

Note that the last 36 months count as deemed occupation, as the house was Stuart’s principal private residence (PPR)
at some point during his period of ownership.
The first 36 months of the period from 1 March 1995 to 31 March 2001 qualifies as a deemed occupation period as
Stuart and Rebecca returned to occupy the property on 1 April 2001. The remainder of the period will be treated as a
period of absence, although letting relief is available for part of the period (see below).
The exempt element of the gain is the proportion during which the property was occupied, real or deemed. This is
￡138,665 (90/139 x ￡214,160).
(2) The chargeable gain is restricted for the period that the property was let out. This is restricted to the lowest of the
following:
(i) the gain attributable to the letting period (27/139 x 214,160) = ￡41,599
(ii) ￡40,000
(iii) the total exempt PPR gain = ￡138,665
i.e. ￡40,000.
(3) The taper relief is effectively wasted, having restricted losses b/f to preserve the annual exemption.

(ii) Assuming the new structure is implemented with effect from 1 August 2006, calculate the level of

management charge that should be made by Bold plc to Linden Limited for the year ended 31 July

2007, so as to minimise the group’s overall corporation tax (CT) liability for that year. (2 marks)

正确答案：
(ii) For the year ended 31 July 2007, there will be two associated companies in the group. Bold plc will count as an
associated company as it is not dormant throughout the period in question. As a result, the corporation tax limits will be
divided by two (i.e. the number of associates) giving an upper limit of ￡750,000 (￡1·5 million/2). As Linden Limited
is anticipated to make profits of ￡1·4 million in the year to 31 July 2007 it will pay corporation tax at the rate of 30%.
Bold plc can earn trading profits up to ￡150,000 (￡300,000/2) and pay tax at the rate of 19%. It will therefore
minimise the group’s corporation tax liability if maximum use is made of this small companies rate band, as it will save
￡16,500 (150,000 x (30% – 19%)) of corporation tax for the year to 31 July 2007. Bold plc should therefore make
a management charge of sufficient size to give it profits for that year equal to ￡150,000.
While the transfer pricing legislation no longer applies to small and medium sized enterprises, Bold plc should
nevertheless ensure that there is evidence to support the actual charge made in terms of the services provided.

声明：本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传，本网站不拥有所有权，未作人工编辑处理，也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容，欢迎发送邮件至：contact@51tk.com 进行举报，并提供相关证据，工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你，一经查实，本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。

站内搜索
热门标签