消息！对于ACCA不是适合所有同学的，看看你适合考ACCA吗？

发布时间：2020-05-20

大家想知道ACCA相关考试信息吗？那么对于ACCA不是适合所有同学的，看看你适合考ACCA吗？带着这个问题，我们一起来了解下吧！

 到底什么样的同学适合考ACCA？

第一类：高中及大专学历的同学这些同学在学历水平上略有欠缺，财务金融领域对这方面要求的综合素质又比较高，那么通过ACCA来提高自己的学历以及职业竞争力，是一箭双雕的选择。  

第二类：学校不好想要逆袭的同学，学习ACCA，不仅能提高英语成绩，提高眼界和知识面，还能提高你的自信和思维能力，在面对名校人才竞争时，你未必争不过。 

第三类是：英国留学生、会计硕士  ACCA是英国的财会考试，如果你正好在英国留学，并且就读于会计相关专业，完全可以利用教材、地点之便参加ACCA考试。

作为本土考试，在英国大学里学习相关知识，可以让你更快掌握英式的答题思路和逻辑思维，考起试来事半功倍。  

第四类：想让大学生活更充实的同学，大学是很多人人生最后能够专心学习的求学阶段，也是我们踏入社会、告别读书的过渡时期，如果你想要学习到更多的知识，掌握更多的技能，那么，学习ACCA是个很不错的选择。你会发现，学了之后，ACCA带给你的收获远超你的想象。  

第五类：想毕业后找到好工作的同学，大学毕业后有很多不同的选择，对于选择直接工作的同学来说，必须想方设法提高自己的职场竞争力。毕业生每年都在增长，毕业就失业并不是危言耸听。

与之形成鲜明对比的是，拿了ACCA证书的小伙伴很多毕业之后成功进入四大、知名企业，不仅提升了自己的专业技能和核心竞争力，而且为自己的人生赢得了更高的起点。

ACCA总部推荐学员使用双币信用卡在线考试报名。这样将可以及时确认报名成功并且可以享受提前考试报名时段的优惠价格。

报名考试所需费用要一次交清吗?

不是的，要是一次缴清费用，那你就要荷包大出血了!估计连土都吃不起了，ACCA注册报名时只需交注册费，以后再逐项交纳免试费、年费、考试费。

考生可以随时关注自己的账单，并且注册后未及时上缴年费，会收到催缴邮件，补上就可以了。考试费用根据每次的报考科目和报考时间段来进行缴费。

现在想想，也不太可能让你一次交清，毕竟，很难完全打包票，在ACCA考试13个科目中，没有一个科目挂科，每一科都能一把过，如果没有通过，那么，下一个考季还要继续报名考试，还要递交考试费用。

不同考生注册ACCA时间的不同，导致年费缴纳的时间不同。考试费受考试阶段和ACCA报考时间影响，所以准备报考的考生抓紧时间报名。

以上就是本次51题库考试学习网为大家分享的整体内容，如果还想了解更多关于这方面的信息，也可关注51题库考试学习网解决心中的疑惑。

下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题，供大家学习参考。

(b) Briefly describe the way in which a ‘person specification’ differs from a ‘job description’. (3 marks)

正确答案：
Part (b):
The difference between a person specification and a job description is that a person specification sets out the qualities of an ideal
candidate whereas a job description defines the duties and responsibilities of the job.

James died on 22 January 2015. He had made the following gifts during his lifetime:

(1) On 9 October 2007, a cash gift of ￡35,000 to a trust. No lifetime inheritance tax was payable in respect of this gift.

(2) On 14 May 2013, a cash gift of ￡420,000 to his daughter.

(3) On 2 August 2013, a gift of a property valued at ￡260,000 to a trust. No lifetime inheritance tax was payable in respect of this gift because it was covered by the nil rate band. By the time of James’ death on 22 January 2015, the property had increased in value to ￡310,000.

On 22 January 2015, James’ estate was valued at ￡870,000. Under the terms of his will, James left his entire estate to his children.

The nil rate band of James’ wife was fully utilised when she died ten years ago.

The nil rate band for the tax year 2007–08 is ￡300,000, and for the tax year 2013–14 it is ￡325,000.

Required:

(a) Calculate the inheritance tax which will be payable as a result of James’ death, and state who will be responsible for paying the tax. (6 marks)

(b) Explain why it might have been beneficial for inheritance tax purposes if James had left a portion of his estate to his grandchildren rather than to his children. (2 marks)

(c) Explain why it might be advantageous for inheritance tax purposes for a person to make lifetime gifts even when such gifts are made within seven years of death.

Notes:

1. Your answer should include a calculation of James’ inheritance tax saving from making the gift of property to the trust on 2 August 2013 rather than retaining the property until his death.

2. You are not expected to consider lifetime exemptions in this part of the question. (2 marks)

正确答案：

(a) James – Inheritance tax arising on death

Lifetime transfers within seven years of death

The personal representatives of James’ estate will be responsible for paying the inheritance tax of ￡348,000.

Working – Available nil rate band

(b) Skipping a generation avoids a further charge to inheritance tax when the children die. Gifts will then only be taxed once before being inherited by the grandchildren, rather than twice.

(c) (1) Even if the donor does not survive for seven years, taper relief will reduce the amount of IHT payable after three years.

(2) The value of potentially exempt transfers and chargeable lifetime transfers are fixed at the time they are made.

(3) James therefore saved inheritance tax of ￡20,000 ((310,000 – 260,000) at 40%) by making the lifetime gift of property.

3 You are the manager responsible for the audit of Lamont Co. The company’s principal activity is wholesaling frozen

fish. The draft consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2007 show revenue of $67·0 million

(2006 – $62·3 million), profit before taxation of $11·9 million (2006 – $14·2 million) and total assets of

$48·0 million (2006 – $36·4 million).

The following issues arising during the final audit have been noted on a schedule of points for your attention:

(a) In early 2007 a chemical leakage from refrigeration units owned by Lamont caused contamination of some of its

property. Lamont has incurred $0·3 million in clean up costs, $0·6 million in modernisation of the units to

prevent future leakage and a $30,000 fine to a regulatory agency. Apart from the fine, which has been expensed,

these costs have been capitalised as improvements. (7 marks)

Required:

For each of the above issues:

(i) comment on the matters that you should consider; and

(ii) state the audit evidence that you should expect to find,

in undertaking your review of the audit working papers and financial statements of Lamont Co for the year ended

31 March 2007.

NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three issues.

正确答案：
3 LAMONT CO
(a) Chemical leakage
(i) Matters
■ $30,000 fine is very immaterial (just 1/4% profit before tax). This is revenue expenditure and it is correct that it
has been expensed to the income statement.
■ $0·3 million represents 0·6% total assets and 2·5% profit before tax and is not material on its own. $0·6 million
represents 1·2% total assets and 5% profit before tax and is therefore material to the financial statements.
■ The $0·3 million clean-up costs should not have been capitalised as the condition of the property is not improved
as compared with its condition before the leakage occurred. Although not material in isolation this amount should
be adjusted for and expensed, thereby reducing the aggregate of uncorrected misstatements.
■ It may be correct that $0·6 million incurred in modernising the refrigeration units should be capitalised as a major
overhaul (IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment). However, any parts scrapped as a result of the modernisation
should be treated as disposals (i.e. written off to the income statement).
■ The carrying amount of the refrigeration units at 31 March 2007, including the $0·6 million for modernisation,
should not exceed recoverable amount (i.e. the higher of value in use and fair value less costs to sell). If it does,
an allowance for the impairment loss arising must be recognised in accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets.
(ii) Audit evidence
■ A breakdown/analysis of costs incurred on the clean-up and modernisation amounting to $0·3 million and
$0·6 million respectively.
■ Agreement of largest amounts to invoices from suppliers/consultants/sub-contractors, etc and settlement thereof
traced from the cash book to the bank statement.
■ Physical inspection of the refrigeration units to confirm their modernisation and that they are in working order. (Do
they contain frozen fish?)
■ Sample of components selected from the non-current asset register traced to the refrigeration units and inspected
to ensure continuing existence.
■ $30,000 penalty notice from the regulatory agency and corresponding cash book payment/payment per the bank
statement.
■ Written management representation that there are no further penalties that should be provided for or disclosed other
than the $30,000 that has been accounted for.

声明：本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传，本网站不拥有所有权，未作人工编辑处理，也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容，欢迎发送邮件至：contact@51tk.com 进行举报，并提供相关证据，工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你，一经查实，本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。

站内搜索
热门标签