答疑:报名ACCA考试需要缴纳哪些费用?

发布时间:2020-08-13


报名ACCA考试需要缴纳哪些费用?小伙伴都知道吗?下面51题库考试学习网就带领大家一起来看看,关于ACCA考试需要缴纳的费用,想要了解的小伙伴赶紧来围观吧。

一、注册费

首先要注册成为ACCA的学员,此项有一个需要一次性即时缴纳的注册费用,首次注册费和重新注册费均为£79

二、年费

注册成ACCA学员后,您需要每年缴纳年费,以保持学员/会员身份。官网公布的学员年费为£112,以后年费以ACCA官网的公布为准,可能会有调整。

年费这里需要特别注意的是:

1510日前注册的需要缴纳本年度的年费;

2510日后注册的学生可以免除本年度的年费。

(注意可能上下有3-5天差异)

年底,您需要缴纳2020年的年费,以保持学员/会员身份。同时,此后每年年底,您都需要缴纳下一年的年费了,您如果没有在规定时间内及时付清所欠的任何费用(年费、免试费等)都将被除名。请您登录ACCA全球官网在MY ACCA中查看自己是否有任何欠费账单并及时支付。

三、单科考试费用

ACCA 一共有 15 科,需要考试的科目为 13 科。具体科目如下:

第一阶段:

主要涉及作为一名财务助理或审计助理应该具备的专业知识,第 一阶段完成可获得全球认可的ACCA 知识阶段资格证书初级商业会计证书;课程列表:

知识课程

(AB)会计师与企业 Accountant in Business

(MA)管理会计 Management Accounting

(FA)财务会计 Financial Accounting

第二阶段:

主要涵盖作为一名财务经理或审计经理或企业中层管理者应具备的专业技能,通过以下六门课 程的考试可获得全球认可的 ACCA 技能阶段资格证书高级商业会计证书,同时提交一篇7500 字左右的论文还可申请获得英国牛津布鲁克斯大学本科学位,并可赴英国本科参加毕业典礼以及继续读研;

课程列表:

(LW)公司法与商法 Corporate and Business Law

(PM)业绩管理 Performance Management

(TX)税务 Taxation

(FR)财务报告 Financial Reporting

(AA)审计与认证业务 Audit and Assurance

(FM)财务管理 Financial Management

第三阶段:

主要涵盖作为一名财务总监或审计合伙人或企业高管应具备的核心技能,通过后面五门课程考试后 可获得 ACCA 资格认证,并可申请英国牛津布鲁克斯大学、伯明翰城市大学等国外大学的硕士学位;

课程列表:

(SBL)企业战略领导力 Strategic Business leader

(SBR)企业战略报告 Strategic Business Reporting

(AFM)高级财务管理 Advanced Financial Management

(APM)高级业绩管理 Advanced Performance Management

(ATX)高级税务 Advanced Taxation

(AAA)高级审计与认证业务 Advanced Audit and Assurance

注:所有课程中 AB-SBR 是必考课程,AFM-AAA 是选修课程(4 2)

ACCA科目考试费用与考生的报考时间有关,根据考生的报名时间的不同而有所区别。报考时段分为提前报名时段,常规报名时段和后期报名时段。具体费用敬请参照费用标准。免试课程要交纳免试费,免试费与提前报名时段考试费相同;补考需另交费,费用与考试费用相同。由于每人免试科目不同,所以教材和培训费用因人而异。

以上是ACCA考试需要缴纳的费用,小伙伴们都清楚了吗?如果想要了解更多关于ACCA考试的资讯,敬请关注51题库考试学习网!


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(b) Illustrate EACH of the six problems chosen in (a) using the data from the Bettamould division/TRG scenario;

and (6 marks)

正确答案:
(b) An illustration of each of the problems using the data from the Battamould division/TRG scenario is as follows:
Meeting only the lowest targets
– In the scenario, the budgeted variable cost of $200 per tonne has been agreed. There is no specific incentive for the
Bettamould division to try to achieve a better level of performance.
Using more resources than necessary
– In the scenario, the current budget allows for 5% machine idle time. There is evidence that a move to outsourcing
machine maintenance from a specialist company could help reduce idle time levels and permit annual output in excess
of 100,000 tonnes.
Making the bonus – whatever it takes
– At present, the only sanction/incentive is to achieve 100,000 tonnes of output. There is no mention of any sanction for
example, if processing losses (and hence costs) rise to 20% of material inputs.
Competing against other divisions, business units and departments
– At present, the Bettamould division sources its materials from chosen suppliers who have been used for some years.
There is evidence that materials of equal specification could be sourced for 40% of the annual requirement from another
TRG division which has spare capacity. Why has this not been investigated?
Ensuring that what is in the budget is spent
– In the Bettamould scenario, there is a fixed cost budget allowance of $50,000,000. We are told in the question that
salaries of all employees and management are paid on a fixed salary basis. Bettamould’s management will not want a
reduction in the fixed budget allowance, since this could lead to the need to reduce the number of employees, which
they may see as having a detrimental effect on the ability of the division to meet its annual budget output target of
100,000 tonnes.
Providing inaccurate forecasts
– In the scenario there may have been deliberate efforts to increase the agreed budget level of aspects of measures and
costs. For example, by putting forward the argument that the budget requirement of 15% processing losses is acceptable
because of the likelihood that ageing machinery will be less effective in the coming budget period.
Meeting the target but not beating it
– In the scenario the bonus of 5% of salary is payable as long as the 100,000 tonnes of output is achieved. This does
not require that actual results will show any other aspects of the budget being improved upon. For example there is no
need to consider a reduction in the current level of quality checks (25% of daily throughput) to the 10% level that current
evidence suggests is achieved by competitor companies. The current budget agreement allows the Bettamould division
to transfer its output to market based profit centres at $200 + $500 = $700 per tonne. There is no specified penalty
if costs exceed this target level.
Avoiding risks
– Bettamould has not yet incorporated the changes listed in note 4 in the question. For example why has the sourcing of
40% of required materials from another TRC division not been quantified and evaluated. It is possible that the division
with spare capacity could supply the material at cost (possibly based on marginal cost) which would be less than
currently paid to a supplier external to TRC. It may be that Bettamould have not pursued this possibility because of risk
factors relating to the quality of the material transferred or its continued availability where the supplying division had an
upturn in the level of more profitable external business.

(ii) Advise Clifford of the capital gains tax implications of the alternative of selling the Oxford house and

garden by means of two separate disposals as proposed. Calculations are not required for this part of

the question. (3 marks)

正确答案:
(ii) The implications of selling the Oxford house and garden in two separate disposals
The additional sales proceeds would result in an increase in Clifford’s capital gains and consequently his tax liability.
When computing the gain on the sale of the house together with a small part of the garden, the allowable cost would
be a proportion of the original cost. That proportion would be A/A + B where A is the value of the house and garden
that has been sold and B is the value of the part of the garden that has been retained. Principal private residence relief
and taper relief would be available in the same way as that set out in (i) above.
When computing the gain on the sale of the remainder of the garden, the cost would be the original cost of the property
less the amount used in computing the gain on the earlier disposal. Principal private residence relief would not be
available as the land sold is not a dwelling house or part of one.

(d) Estimate by how much the bid might be increased without the shareholders of Paxis suffering a fall in their expected wealth, and discuss whether or not the directors of Paxis should proceed with the bid. (5 marks)

正确答案:

(d) The current bid values the shares of Wragger at £19·07 million, compared to the current market value of £15·36 million, a premium of £3·71 million. The expected synergy is £15,570,000. If these data are accurate the bid could be substantially increased without the shareholders of Paxis suffering a fall in their expected wealth. In theory, the bid could be increased by an additional £11,860,000, or 148 pence for each existing Wragger share.
There might also be strategic reasons for undertaking the bid, and the acquisition of Wragger might lead to future options that are not valued by the above analysis.
The proposed acquisition is expected to result in substantial synergy, and to create wealth for the shareholders of both companies. The directors are recommended to proceed with the bid.


声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。