注意:报名注册ACCA考试过程中可能会遇到的问题

发布时间:2020-09-04


各位小伙伴注意了!如今报考ACCA考试的人越来越多,报名注册ACCA考试时在费用缴纳环节有时候会附带产生一些问题,这些问题又应该如何解决呢?51题库考试学习网为大家带来了相关问题及解答,让我们一起来看看吧!

1.ACCA考试注册报名所需费用要一次交清吗?

不是的,ACCA注册报名时只需交注册费(按当年费用标准),以后再逐项交纳免试费、年费、考试费。考生可以随时关注自己MYACCA的账单,并且注册后未及时上缴年费,会收到催缴邮件,补上就可以了。考试费用根据每次的报考科目和报考时间段来进行缴费。在ACCA考试13个科目中,如果有挂科没有通过,那么,下一个考季还要继续报名考试,还要递交考试费用。

不同考生注册ACCA时间的不同,导致年费缴纳的时间不同。考试费受考试阶段和ACCA报考时间影响,所以准备报考的考生抓紧时间报名。

2.ACCA考试费用都需交英镑吗?

是的,一律按照ACCA考试报名当时的英镑汇率进行结算。注册费、年费、考试费、免试费和申请牛津布鲁克斯大学学位的管理费需用英镑结算,可以通过银行汇票或国际结付的信用卡支付。办理银行汇票可以用外汇或人民币。凭身份证就可以到有外汇业务和票汇业务的银行办理换汇和票汇业务。

ACCA总部推荐学员使用双币信用卡在线考试报名。这样将可以及时确认报名成功并且可以享受提前考试报名时段的优惠价格。

3.关于ACCA考试报名付款问题

有些ACCA考试小伙伴反映,银行卡已划款,但MY ACCA10分钟内尚未入账,或者注册时仍旧提示需要付款。则说明付款用于网络问题接收失败,请重新支付。支付失败的款项会在7个工作日左右原路退回到支付卡。如未及时收到退款,请及时联系ACCA查询。

还有一种情况是,付款时出现错误,无法支付。说明可能网络或者浏览器有问题,请尝试其他电脑和浏览器,如果还是无法解决问题。请截屏联系ACCA总部(ACCA 24小时全球客服中心:students@accaglobal.com;电话:0044141-5822000)。

4.欠费被除名后如何恢复ACCA身份?

有些ACCA考试小伙伴长期忘记清缴年费,甚至受到催缴邮件后也不上心,没有进行及时缴费,等到需要报名考试的时候,登陆后才发现都被除名了,应该怎么办?

请已被除名的学员/会员发邮件到ACCA 24小时全球客服中心索要电子版的重新注册表格。学员需要缴纳当年欠费及重新注册费,并填写重新注册表后传真或致电英国总部。会员需要缴纳过往欠费及重新注册费,并填写重新注册表后传真或致电英国总部。具体事宜及表格索要可以联系当地代表处,让当地ACCA工作人员协助解决。

以上就是今天分享的全部内容了,各位小伙伴根据自己的情况进行查阅,希望本文对各位有所帮助,预祝各位取得满意的成绩,如需了解更多相关内容,请关注51题库考试学习网!


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(e) Job instruction. (3 marks)

正确答案:
(e) Job instruction is a one to one method of training through which the trainee is shown how to fulfill a task and then allowed to get on with that task. It is a systematic approach to training involving immediate supervision and by allowing the trainee to complete the task is a cost effective way of training.

(c) Discuss TWO limitations of the Boston Consulting Group matrix as a strategic planning tool. (4 marks)

正确答案:
(c) There are numerous criticisms that have been made regarding the BCG growth share matrix. Two such criticisms are as
follows:
– It is a model and the weakness of any model is inherent in its assumptions. For example many strategists are of the
opinion that the axes of the model are much too simplistic. The model implies that competitive strength is indicated by
relative market share. However other factors such as strength of brands, perceived product/service quality and costs
structures also contribute to competitive strength.
Likewise the model implies that the attractiveness of the marketplace is indicated by the growth rate of the market. This
is not necessarily the case as organisations that lack the necessary capital resources may find low-growth markets an
attractive proposition especially as they tend to have a lower risk profile than high-growth markets.
– There are problems with defining the market. The model requires management to define the marketplace within which
a business is trading in order that its rate of growth and relative market share can be calculated. This can prove
problematic in comparing competitors since if they supply different products and services then the absence of a
consistent basis for comparison impairs the usefulness of the model.
Other valid criticisms include the following:
The application of the BCG matrix may prove costly and time-consuming since it necessitates the collection of a large
amount of data. The use of the model may also lead to unfortunate consequences, such as:
– Moving into areas where there is little experience
– Over-milking of cash cows
– Abandonment of potentially healthy businesses labelled as problem children
– Neglect of interrelationships among businesses, and
– Too many problem children within the business portfolio largely as a consequence of incorrect focus of
management attention.

5 GE Railways plc (GER) operates a passenger train service in Holtland. The directors have always focused solely on

the use of traditional financial measures in order to assess the performance of GER since it commenced operations

in 1992. The Managing Director of GER has asked you, as a management accountant, for assistance with regard to

the adoption of a balanced scorecard approach to performance measurement within GER.

Required:

(a) Prepare a memorandum explaining the potential benefits and limitations that may arise from the adoption of

a balanced scorecard approach to performance measurement within GER. (8 marks)

正确答案:
(a) To: Board of directors
From: Management Accountant
Date: 8 June 2007
The potential benefits of the adoption of a balanced scorecard approach to performance measurement within GER are as
follows:
A broader business perspective
Financial measures invariably have an inward-looking perspective. The balanced scorecard is wider in its scope and
application. It has an external focus and looks at comparisons with competitors in order to establish what constitutes best
practice and ensures that required changes are made in order to achieve it. The use of the balanced scorecard requires a
balance of both financial and non-financial measures and goals.
A greater strategic focus
The use of the balanced scorecard focuses to a much greater extent on the longer term. There is a far greater emphasis on
strategic considerations. It attempts to identify the needs and wants of customers and the new products and markets. Hence
it requires a balance between short term and long term performance measures.
A greater focus on qualitative aspects
The use of the balanced scorecard attempts to overcome the over-emphasis of traditional measures on the quantifiable aspects
of the internal operations of an organisation expressed in purely financial terms. Its use requires a balance between
quantitative and qualitative performance measures. For example, customer satisfaction is a qualitative performance measure
which is given prominence under the balanced scorecard approach.
A greater focus on longer term performance
The use of traditional financial measures is often dominated by financial accounting requirements, for example, the need to
show fixed assets at their historic cost. Also, they are primarily focused on short-term profitability and return on capital
employed in order to gain stakeholder approval of short term financial reports, the longer term or whole life cycle often being
ignored.
The limitations of a balanced scorecard approach to performance measurement may be viewed as follows:
The balanced scorecard attempts to identify the chain of cause and effect relationships which will provide the stimulus for
the future success of an organisation.
Advocates of a balanced scorecard approach to performance measurement suggest that it can constitute a vital component
of the strategic management process.
However, Robert Kaplan and David Norton, the authors of the balanced scorecard concept concede that it may not be suitable
for all firms. Norton suggests that it is most suitable for firms which have a long lead time between management action and
financial benefit and that it will be less suitable for firms with a short-term focus. However, other flaws can be detected in
the balanced scorecard.
The balanced scorecard promises to outline the theory of the firm by clearly linking the driver/outcome measures in a cause
and effect chain, but this will be difficult if not impossible to achieve.
The precise cause and effect relationships between measures for each of the perspectives on the balanced scorecard will be
complex because the driver and outcome measures for the various perspectives are interlinked. For example, customer
satisfaction may be seen to be a function of several drivers, such as employee satisfaction, manufacturing cycle time and
quality. However, employee satisfaction may in turn be partially driven by customer satisfaction and employee satisfaction
may partially drive manufacturing cycle time. A consequence of this non-linearity of the cause and effect chain (i.e., there is
non-linear relationship between an individual driver and a single outcome measure), is that there must be a question mark
as to the accuracy of any calculated correlations between driver and outcome measures. Allied to this point, any calculated
correlations will be historic. This implies that it will only be possible to determine the accuracy of cause and effect linkages
after the event, which could make the use of the balanced scorecard in dynamic industries questionable. If the market is
undergoing rapid evolution, for example, how meaningful are current measures of customer satisfaction or market share?
These criticisms do not necessarily undermine the usefulness of the balanced scorecard in presenting a more comprehensive
picture of organisational performance but they do raise doubts concerning claims that a balanced scorecard can be
constructed which will outline a clear cause and effect chain between driver and outcome measures and the firm’s financial
objectives.

16 Which of the following events between the balance sheet date and the date the financial statements are

authorised for issue must be adjusted in the financial statements?

1 Declaration of equity dividends.

2 Decline in market value of investments.

3 The announcement of changes in tax rates.

4 The announcement of a major restructuring.

A 1

A 1 only

B 2 and 4

C 3 only

D None of them

正确答案:D

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。