网友您好, 请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目:

题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
单选题
Joyce’s works helped introduce all except which of the following literary elements into modern English literature?
A

Narration through second-person address

B

Novel structure based on real-time chronology

C

Linguistic experimentation

D

Literary realism concerning physical reality

E

Stream of consciousness


参考答案

参考解析
解析:
细节题。第三段第五句“The structure was unique…”对应B项;最后一段第三句对应C项;第三段倒数第二句“Joyce mentions everything that happens to Bloom…”对应D项;第三段最后一句:Joyce employed a then-revolutionary technique called stream of consciousness,对应E项;故本题应选A项。
更多 “单选题Joyce’s works helped introduce all except which of the following literary elements into modern English literature?A Narration through second-person addressB Novel structure based on real-time chronologyC Linguistic experimentationD Literary realism concerning physical realityE Stream of consciousness” 相关考题
考题 The 18th century witnessed a new literary form. -the modern English novel, which, contrary to the medieval romance, gives a realistic presentation of life of the common English people.() 此题为判断题(对,错)。

考题 which literary form. flourished in elizabethan age more than any other form. of literature?A. Novel.B. Drama.C. Poetry.D. Essay.

考题 You don't know what you've got till it's gone,Joni Mitchell rold us.So now that the 2018 Nobel Prize in Literature will be postponed-it seems worth asking what,exactly,the prize gives us.For decades,the choices of the Swedish Academy have failed to provoke much interest from American publishers and readers.This i.s not just because American readers are resistant to fiction in translation,as publishers often complain.On the contrary,over the last two decades,many foreign writers have made a major impact on American literature.But then,the failure of the Swedish Academy to reflect the actual judgment of literary history is nothing new.If you drew a Venn diagram showing the winners of the Nobel Prize in one circle and the most influential and widely read 20th-century writers in the other,their area of overlap would be surprisingly small.Does this mean that a different group of critics and professors in a bigger,more diverse country woulcl have done a better job at picking the winners?Very possibly.In the mind of the general public,the Nobel basically descends from the sky to bless the winner.But it is nothing more or less than the decision of a particular group of readers,with their own strengths and weaknesses.And the problem with the Nobel Prize in Literature goes deeper.No matter who is in the room where it happens,the Nobel Prize is based on the idea that merit can best be determined by a small group of specialists.This may make sense for the prizes in the sciences,since those fields are less than penetrable to anyone but fellow practitioners.Even in the sciences,however,there is a growing sense that the tradition of awarding the prize to just one or two people distoris the way modern science is actually practiced today:Most important discoveries are the work of teams,not of individual geniuses brooding in isolation.Literature is at least produced by individual authors;but in this case,the Nobel's reliance on seemingly expert judgment runs into a different problem.For literature is not addressed to an audience of experts;it is open to the judgment of every reader.Nor is literature proZressive,with new discoveries replacing old ones:Homer is just as groundbreaking today as he was 2,500 years ago.This makes it impossible to rank literary works according to an objective standard of superiority.Good criticism helps people to find the books that will speak to them,but it doesn't attempt to simply name"the most outstanding work,"in the way the Nobel Prize does.A book earns the status of a classic,not because it is approved by a committee or put on a syllabus,but simply because a lot of people like it for a long time.Literary reputation can only emerge on the free market,not through central planning. The author mentioned science prizes to support the view thatA.scientific reputation should depend on expert opinion. B.science prizes should not ignore the work of teams. C.literary writers should be judged by fellow writers. D.literary merit should not rely on specialist judgment.

考题 You don't know what you've got till it's gone,Joni Mitchell rold us.So now that the 2018 Nobel Prize in Literature will be postponed-it seems worth asking what,exactly,the prize gives us.For decades,the choices of the Swedish Academy have failed to provoke much interest from American publishers and readers.This i.s not just because American readers are resistant to fiction in translation,as publishers often complain.On the contrary,over the last two decades,many foreign writers have made a major impact on American literature.But then,the failure of the Swedish Academy to reflect the actual judgment of literary history is nothing new.If you drew a Venn diagram showing the winners of the Nobel Prize in one circle and the most influential and widely read 20th-century writers in the other,their area of overlap would be surprisingly small.Does this mean that a different group of critics and professors in a bigger,more diverse country woulcl have done a better job at picking the winners?Very possibly.In the mind of the general public,the Nobel basically descends from the sky to bless the winner.But it is nothing more or less than the decision of a particular group of readers,with their own strengths and weaknesses.And the problem with the Nobel Prize in Literature goes deeper.No matter who is in the room where it happens,the Nobel Prize is based on the idea that merit can best be determined by a small group of specialists.This may make sense for the prizes in the sciences,since those fields are less than penetrable to anyone but fellow practitioners.Even in the sciences,however,there is a growing sense that the tradition of awarding the prize to just one or two people distoris the way modern science is actually practiced today:Most important discoveries are the work of teams,not of individual geniuses brooding in isolation.Literature is at least produced by individual authors;but in this case,the Nobel's reliance on seemingly expert judgment runs into a different problem.For literature is not addressed to an audience of experts;it is open to the judgment of every reader.Nor is literature proZressive,with new discoveries replacing old ones:Homer is just as groundbreaking today as he was 2,500 years ago.This makes it impossible to rank literary works according to an objective standard of superiority.Good criticism helps people to find the books that will speak to them,but it doesn't attempt to simply name"the most outstanding work,"in the way the Nobel Prize does.A book earns the status of a classic,not because it is approved by a committee or put on a syllabus,but simply because a lot of people like it for a long time.Literary reputation can only emerge on the free market,not through central planning. It can be inferred from Para.5 thatA.literary creation requires more talent than science. B.nowadays literature is seeing a decline and fall. C.old literary works do not always lack novelty. D.there are no criteria for ranking literary works.

考题 You don't know what you've got till it's gone,Joni Mitchell rold us.So now that the 2018 Nobel Prize in Literature will be postponed-it seems worth asking what,exactly,the prize gives us.For decades,the choices of the Swedish Academy have failed to provoke much interest from American publishers and readers.This i.s not just because American readers are resistant to fiction in translation,as publishers often complain.On the contrary,over the last two decades,many foreign writers have made a major impact on American literature.But then,the failure of the Swedish Academy to reflect the actual judgment of literary history is nothing new.If you drew a Venn diagram showing the winners of the Nobel Prize in one circle and the most influential and widely read 20th-century writers in the other,their area of overlap would be surprisingly small.Does this mean that a different group of critics and professors in a bigger,more diverse country woulcl have done a better job at picking the winners?Very possibly.In the mind of the general public,the Nobel basically descends from the sky to bless the winner.But it is nothing more or less than the decision of a particular group of readers,with their own strengths and weaknesses.And the problem with the Nobel Prize in Literature goes deeper.No matter who is in the room where it happens,the Nobel Prize is based on the idea that merit can best be determined by a small group of specialists.This may make sense for the prizes in the sciences,since those fields are less than penetrable to anyone but fellow practitioners.Even in the sciences,however,there is a growing sense that the tradition of awarding the prize to just one or two people distoris the way modern science is actually practiced today:Most important discoveries are the work of teams,not of individual geniuses brooding in isolation.Literature is at least produced by individual authors;but in this case,the Nobel's reliance on seemingly expert judgment runs into a different problem.For literature is not addressed to an audience of experts;it is open to the judgment of every reader.Nor is literature proZressive,with new discoveries replacing old ones:Homer is just as groundbreaking today as he was 2,500 years ago.This makes it impossible to rank literary works according to an objective standard of superiority.Good criticism helps people to find the books that will speak to them,but it doesn't attempt to simply name"the most outstanding work,"in the way the Nobel Prize does.A book earns the status of a classic,not because it is approved by a committee or put on a syllabus,but simply because a lot of people like it for a long time.Literary reputation can only emerge on the free market,not through central planning. We can learn from the last paragraph thatA.enduring love of readers makes a work a classic. B.readers do need the Nobel Prize in Literature. C.marketing makes contribution to literary reputation. D.excellent works naturally attract much good criticism.

考题 It can be inferred from the passage that all of the following are literary detectives who have tried,by means of either scholarship or criticism,to help solve the“great puzzle”mentioned in the first line EXCEPT( ) A.Bardeche B.Vallette C.Fallois D.Kolb

考题 Which of the following literary forms is regarded as the most common and influential form that English ( ) poetry has taken since 16th century? A.Sonnet B.Blank Verse C.Free Verse D.Essay

考题 Name the author of the following literary works. The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling

考题 Name the author of the following literary works. The Lake Isle of Innisfree

考题 单选题A storm’s track is characterized by all of the following except().A the direction the storm has come fromB the direction in which the storm is movingC the speed at which the storm is movingD the path taken by the storm

考题 单选题Which of the following would make the most appropriate title for this passage?A The Long Way Home: Ulysses and Finnegan’s WakeB James Joyce, Ulysses, and the Battle against CensorshipC The Works of James Joyce, Ireland’s Literary GeniusD The Hidden Value of James Joyce’s Great NovelsE A Portrait of James Joyce as a Young Man

考题 单选题The author suggests that Griffith’s contributions to the cinema had which of the following results?  Ⅰ. Literary works, especially Victorian novels, became popular sources for film subjects.  Ⅱ. Audience appreciation of other film directors’ experimentations with cinematic syntax was increased.  Ⅲ. Many of the artistic limitations thought to be inherent in filmmaking were shown to be really nonexistent.A Ⅱ onlyB Ⅲ onlyC I and Ⅱ onlyD Ⅱ and Ⅲ only

考题 单选题Mark Twain’s contribution to the development of realism and to American literature as a whole was partly through his theories of localism in American fiction, and partly through _____.A his humorB his satireC his colloquial styleD his stories of adventures

考题 单选题Europeans began to favour English for all the following reasons EXCEPT its _____.A inherent linguistic propertiesB association with the business worldC links with the United StatesD disassociation from political changes

考题 单选题At the World Literary Center, an organization that works to help people read, the helpers work hard, enabling them to successfully reach their goals.A assistantsB volunteersC part-timersD amateurs

考题 单选题After months of careful rewriting and editing, Carmen was ______ that her latest novel undoubtedly represented her best literary effort to date.A impassiveB sanguineC hesitantD equivocalE dubious

考题 问答题Name the author of the following literary works. A Journal of the Plague Year

考题 单选题Why is it not handy to study film?A Because screenplay is not as well written as literary works.B Because a film cannot be effectively represented by a printed screenplayC Because a film is too complicated.D Because publishers prefer to publish literary works.

考题 单选题Chaucer greatly contributed to the founding of English literary language, the basis of which was formed by the _____, so profusely used by the poet.A English dialectB London dialectC Norman dialectD standard English

考题 问答题Name the author of the following literary works. The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling

考题 单选题The author most likely mentions James Joyce’s childhood, family, and education to serve what purpose?A To suggest that he had to write in order to make a livingB To suggest that he became a writer because of his father’s influenceC To provide the background and cultural context for his literary workD To provide evidence that his literary genius was present when he was a childE To explain his opposition to Catholicism and socialism in his later life

考题 单选题According to the passage, women are changing literary criticism by ______.A noting instances of hostility between men and womenB seeing the literature from fresh points of viewC studying the works of early 20th-century writersD reviewing books written by feministsE resisting masculine influence

考题 单选题All the following can be employed to make the report more effective EXCEPT_____.A providing more vivid pictures and detailsB changing the style to cater for the audience’s appetiteC more live coverage to replace the linguistic explanationD interval shifts of the materials of the coverage

考题 单选题Of all the 18th century novelists Henry Fielding was the first to set out, both in theory and practice, to write specifically a “_____ in prose,” the first to give the modern novel its structure and style.A tragic epicB comic epicC romanceD lyric epic

考题 单选题Based on the information in the passage, which of the following would be the most accurate statement about Dubliners and Finnegan’s Wake?A Dubliners contains one of the greatest short stories in the English language, and Finnegan’s Wake is the greatest story in the English language.B Many of the chief characters in Finnegan’s Wake were earlier introduced in Dubliners.C The linguistic experimentation of Dubliners paved the way for the “night language” of Finnegan’s Wake.D Dubliners is a longer book than Finnegan’s Wake.E Dubliners is a more accessible book than Finnegan’s Wake

考题 单选题The primary purpose of the passage is to ______.A distinguish between serial novels and novel sequencesB contrast American novel sequences with that of French writersC express a critical opinion about the works of Cooper and BalzacD provide an outline for the reading of Cooper’s and Balzac’s novelsE define and provide examples of a particular literary form

考题 单选题From the third paragraph we learn that _____.A the means by which we analyze a literary work cannot be applied to film analysisB a good film and a good story have many elements in commonC we should not pay extra effort to study filmsD using the principles of literary analysis makes no difference in film analysis