网友您好, 请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目:

题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
名词解释题
分子进化树(molecular evolutionary tree)

参考答案

参考解析
解析: 暂无解析
更多 “名词解释题分子进化树(molecular evolutionary tree)” 相关考题
考题 分子美食(Molecular Gastronomy)一词,于()年由匈牙利物理学家NicholasKurti及法籍化学家HerveThis提出。 A.1968B.1978C.1988D.1998

考题 进化树(名词解释)

考题 资料:It’s easy to trace the evolution of the automobile.At most,we’re only talking about a few centuries of technological development,and most of the plans,prototypes and models are still around. With just a little research,you can easily trace the latest model electric hybrid back to its steam-powered ancestors. Your family tree is probably a different matter. Even an extensive genealogy chart can only reach back so far,and mortality puts a rather strict limit on exactly how many “models” are still on the road. Humanity’s evolutionary progression is even more difficult. We still have plenty of living primate relatives,but many of the life forms that connect the evolutionary dots are long extinct. Evolutionary biologists use several methods to decipher exactly how we came to be as we are.In fact,the field itself encompasses several different disciplines in addition to biology,like genetics,psychology,geology,archaeology linguistics,anthropology and primatology just to name a few. Naturally,paleoanthropology also plays a key role,as we have to turn to the fossil record for many clues about our ancient primate,human and nearly human ancestors. While the fossil record by its very nature is incomplete,there’s no shortage of fossil evidence to link the planet’s varied life forms into a great tree of life, a chart that scientists call a phylogenetic tree. You can think of humans as the very tip of just one branch on that tree called “hominid.” Chimpanzees exist at the end of an adjoining branch called “panin.” Follow both the hominid and panin branch back about 5.4 million years, and you’ll find a point where scientists think the two converged from a single,common ancestor. Fossil evidence helps scientists to reconstruct these trees,but so do morphological and genetic studlies. Genetic analysis has yielded striking similarities between chimps and humans. As such, scientists know a last common ancestor of chimps and humans existed,even if we’ve yet to determine the exact species. Yet paleoanthropologists have found numerous hominid fossils to bridge the evolutionary progression from that unknown common ancestor to modern humans. These finds include such famous East African fossils as Lucy(Australopithecus afarensis),which strengthened the importance of bipedalism in human evolution and proved an essential milestone on our way to modern Homo sapiens. Fossil evidence for human evolution will never be complete,as fossils themselves are rare geologic occurrences.Nevertheless,by incorporating other scientific disciplines,we’re able to build an increasingly accurate picture of just what our evolutionary family tree consisted of. What can be inferred from Para.5?A.Morpholoical and genetic studies helped scientists to trace unknown common ancestor of chimps and humans existed. B.Morphological and genetic studies determined exact species of common ancestor of chimps and humans existed. C.Genetic studies found hominid fossils to bridge the evolutionary progression from unknown common ancestor to modern humans. D.Morphological studies helped finding the famous East African fossils and set up an milestone in this field.

考题 资料:It’s easy to trace the evolution of the automobile.At most,we’re only talking about a few centuries of technological development,and most of the plans,prototypes and models are still around. With just a little research,you can easily trace the latest model electric hybrid back to its steam-powered ancestors. Your family tree is probably a different matter. Even an extensive genealogy chart can only reach back so far,and mortality puts a rather strict limit on exactly how many “models” are still on the road. Humanity’s evolutionary progression is even more difficult. We still have plenty of living primate relatives,but many of the life forms that connect the evolutionary dots are long extinct. Evolutionary biologists use several methods to decipher exactly how we came to be as we are.In fact,the field itself encompasses several different disciplines in addition to biology,like genetics,psychology,geology,archaeology linguistics,anthropology and primatology just to name a few. Naturally,paleoanthropology also plays a key role,as we have to turn to the fossil record for many clues about our ancient primate,human and nearly human ancestors. While the fossil record by its very nature is incomplete,there’s no shortage of fossil evidence to link the planet’s varied life forms into a great tree of life, a chart that scientists call a phylogenetic tree. You can think of humans as the very tip of just one branch on that tree called “hominid.” Chimpanzees exist at the end of an adjoining branch called “panin.” Follow both the hominid and panin branch back about 5.4 million years, and you’ll find a point where scientists think the two converged from a single,common ancestor. Fossil evidence helps scientists to reconstruct these trees,but so do morphological and genetic studlies. Genetic analysis has yielded striking similarities between chimps and humans. As such, scientists know a last common ancestor of chimps and humans existed,even if we’ve yet to determine the exact species. Yet paleoanthropologists have found numerous hominid fossils to bridge the evolutionary progression from that unknown common ancestor to modern humans. These finds include such famous East African fossils as Lucy(Australopithecus afarensis),which strengthened the importance of bipedalism in human evolution and proved an essential milestone on our way to modern Homo sapiens. Fossil evidence for human evolution will never be complete,as fossils themselves are rare geologic occurrences.Nevertheless,by incorporating other scientific disciplines,we’re able to build an increasingly accurate picture of just what our evolutionary family tree consisted of. It can be inferred in Para.1 that taking example of tracting electric hybrid is to illustrate that.A.how technological development over a few centuries developed. B.how the plans,prototypes and models of electric hybrid developed. C.how to trace family tree is much the same way astracing electric hybrid. D.why humanity’s evolutionary progression is even more difficult.

考题 资料:It’s easy to trace the evolution of the automobile.At most,we’re only talking about a few centuries of technological development,and most of the plans,prototypes and models are still around. With just a little research,you can easily trace the latest model electric hybrid back to its steam-powered ancestors. Your family tree is probably a different matter. Even an extensive genealogy chart can only reach back so far,and mortality puts a rather strict limit on exactly how many “models” are still on the road. Humanity’s evolutionary progression is even more difficult. We still have plenty of living primate relatives,but many of the life forms that connect the evolutionary dots are long extinct. Evolutionary biologists use several methods to decipher exactly how we came to be as we are.In fact,the field itself encompasses several different disciplines in addition to biology,like genetics,psychology,geology,archaeology linguistics,anthropology and primatology just to name a few. Naturally,paleoanthropology also plays a key role,as we have to turn to the fossil record for many clues about our ancient primate,human and nearly human ancestors. While the fossil record by its very nature is incomplete,there’s no shortage of fossil evidence to link the planet’s varied life forms into a great tree of life, a chart that scientists call a phylogenetic tree. You can think of humans as the very tip of just one branch on that tree called “hominid.” Chimpanzees exist at the end of an adjoining branch called “panin.” Follow both the hominid and panin branch back about 5.4 million years, and you’ll find a point where scientists think the two converged from a single,common ancestor. Fossil evidence helps scientists to reconstruct these trees,but so do morphological and genetic studlies. Genetic analysis has yielded striking similarities between chimps and humans. As such, scientists know a last common ancestor of chimps and humans existed,even if we’ve yet to determine the exact species. Yet paleoanthropologists have found numerous hominid fossils to bridge the evolutionary progression from that unknown common ancestor to modern humans. These finds include such famous East African fossils as Lucy(Australopithecus afarensis),which strengthened the importance of bipedalism in human evolution and proved an essential milestone on our way to modern Homo sapiens. Fossil evidence for human evolution will never be complete,as fossils themselves are rare geologic occurrences.Nevertheless,by incorporating other scientific disciplines,we’re able to build an increasingly accurate picture of just what our evolutionary family tree consisted of. How would people probably trace a family tree,based on Para.2?A.methods of genealogy. B.methods of archaeology linguistics. C.methods of anthropology. D.methods of primatology.

考题 资料:It’s easy to trace the evolution of the automobile.At most,we’re only talking about a few centuries of technological development,and most of the plans,prototypes and models are still around. With just a little research,you can easily trace the latest model electric hybrid back to its steam-powered ancestors. Your family tree is probably a different matter. Even an extensive genealogy chart can only reach back so far,and mortality puts a rather strict limit on exactly how many “models” are still on the road. Humanity’s evolutionary progression is even more difficult. We still have plenty of living primate relatives,but many of the life forms that connect the evolutionary dots are long extinct. Evolutionary biologists use several methods to decipher exactly how we came to be as we are.In fact,the field itself encompasses several different disciplines in addition to biology,like genetics,psychology,geology,archaeology linguistics,anthropology and primatology just to name a few. Naturally,paleoanthropology also plays a key role,as we have to turn to the fossil record for many clues about our ancient primate,human and nearly human ancestors. While the fossil record by its very nature is incomplete,there’s no shortage of fossil evidence to link the planet’s varied life forms into a great tree of life, a chart that scientists call a phylogenetic tree. You can think of humans as the very tip of just one branch on that tree called “hominid.” Chimpanzees exist at the end of an adjoining branch called “panin.” Follow both the hominid and panin branch back about 5.4 million years, and you’ll find a point where scientists think the two converged from a single,common ancestor. Fossil evidence helps scientists to reconstruct these trees,but so do morphological and genetic studlies. Genetic analysis has yielded striking similarities between chimps and humans. As such, scientists know a last common ancestor of chimps and humans existed,even if we’ve yet to determine the exact species. Yet paleoanthropologists have found numerous hominid fossils to bridge the evolutionary progression from that unknown common ancestor to modern humans. These finds include such famous East African fossils as Lucy(Australopithecus afarensis),which strengthened the importance of bipedalism in human evolution and proved an essential milestone on our way to modern Homo sapiens. Fossil evidence for human evolution will never be complete,as fossils themselves are rare geologic occurrences.Nevertheless,by incorporating other scientific disciplines,we’re able to build an increasingly accurate picture of just what our evolutionary family tree consisted of. Which statement is true,based on Para.3?A.Hominid and panin were humans ancestors 5.4 million years ago. B.Chimpanzees existed at a branch of phylogenetic tree are called “hominid”. C.Humans on phylogenetic tree analysis are supposed to be called “panin.” D.Scientists think humans and Chimpanzees converged from a common ancestor,based on phylogenetic tree analysis.

考题 资料:It’s easy to trace the evolution of the automobile.At most,we’re only talking about a few centuries of technological development,and most of the plans,prototypes and models are still around. With just a little research,you can easily trace the latest model electric hybrid back to its steam-powered ancestors. Your family tree is probably a different matter. Even an extensive genealogy chart can only reach back so far,and mortality puts a rather strict limit on exactly how many “models” are still on the road. Humanity’s evolutionary progression is even more difficult. We still have plenty of living primate relatives,but many of the life forms that connect the evolutionary dots are long extinct. Evolutionary biologists use several methods to decipher exactly how we came to be as we are.In fact,the field itself encompasses several different disciplines in addition to biology,like genetics,psychology,geology,archaeology linguistics,anthropology and primatology just to name a few. Naturally,paleoanthropology also plays a key role,as we have to turn to the fossil record for many clues about our ancient primate,human and nearly human ancestors. While the fossil record by its very nature is incomplete,there’s no shortage of fossil evidence to link the planet’s varied life forms into a great tree of life, a chart that scientists call a phylogenetic tree. You can think of humans as the very tip of just one branch on that tree called “hominid.” Chimpanzees exist at the end of an adjoining branch called “panin.” Follow both the hominid and panin branch back about 5.4 million years, and you’ll find a point where scientists think the two converged from a single,common ancestor. Fossil evidence helps scientists to reconstruct these trees,but so do morphological and genetic studlies. Genetic analysis has yielded striking similarities between chimps and humans. As such, scientists know a last common ancestor of chimps and humans existed,even if we’ve yet to determine the exact species. Yet paleoanthropologists have found numerous hominid fossils to bridge the evolutionary progression from that unknown common ancestor to modern humans. These finds include such famous East African fossils as Lucy(Australopithecus afarensis),which strengthened the importance of bipedalism in human evolution and proved an essential milestone on our way to modern Homo sapiens. Fossil evidence for human evolution will never be complete,as fossils themselves are rare geologic occurrences.Nevertheless,by incorporating other scientific disciplines,we’re able to build an increasingly accurate picture of just what our evolutionary family tree consisted of. What does the underlined word “bipedalism”refer to in Para.5?A.Hominid and panin. B.Chimps and humans. C.Walking on two legs. D.Morphological and genetic studies.

考题 分子病(Molecular Disease)

考题 现有:  class Tree {  private static String tree = "tree ";  String getTree ()  {  return tree;  }       }  class Elm extends Tree {  private static String tree = "elm ";  public static void main (String  []  args)  {       new Elm() .go (new Tree())  ;      } }  void go (Tree t)  {  String  s =  t.getTree () +Elm.tree  +  tree  +   (new  Elm() .getTree ()) ;      System.out.println (s) ;}     结果为:()                 A、 elm elm elm elmB、 tree elm elm elmC、 tree elm elm treeD、 tree elm tree elm

考题 分子病理学(molecular pathology)

考题 分子美食(Molecular Gastronomy)一词,于()年由匈牙利物理学家NicholasKurti及法籍化学家HerveThis提出。A、1968B、1978C、1988D、1998

考题 构建序列进化树的一般步骤不包括()。A、建立DNA文库B、建立数据模型C、建立取代模型D、建立进化树

考题 molecular motor (分子发动机)

考题 分子细胞生物学molecular cell biology

考题 分子杂交(molecular hybridization)

考题 final class Tree {  private static String tree = "tree ";  String getTree() { return tree; }  }  class Elm extends Tree {  private static String tree = "elm "; public static void main(String [] args) {  new Elm().go(new Tree());  }  void go(Tree t) {  String s = t.getTree()+Elm.tree+tree+(new Elm().getTree());  System.out.println(s);  } }  结果为:() A、elm elm elm elmB、tree elm elm elmC、tree elm tree elmD、编译失败

考题 CoMFA全称是Comparative molecular field analysis ,比较分子场分析法

考题 名词解释题MEGA(Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis)

考题 单选题构建进化树工具是()。A BLASTB ClustalWC MegaD GCG

考题 单选题现有:  class Tree {  private static String tree = "tree ";  String getTree ()  {  return tree;  }       }  class Elm extends Tree {  private static String tree = "elm ";  public static void main (String  []  args)  {       new Elm() .go (new Tree())  ;      } }  void go (Tree t)  {  String  s =  t.getTree () +Elm.tree  +  tree  +   (new  Elm() .getTree ()) ;      System.out.println (s) ;}     结果为:()A  elm elm elm elmB  tree elm elm elmC  tree elm elm treeD  tree elm tree elm

考题 名词解释题分子伴娘(molecular chaperone)

考题 名词解释题molecular phylogenetic tree

考题 名词解释题分子病理学(molecular pathology)

考题 名词解释题进化树

考题 名词解释题CoMFA全称是Comparative molecular field analysis ,比较分子场分析法

考题 名词解释题MMDB(Molecular Modeling Database)

考题 名词解释题molecular motor (分子发动机)