银行招聘考试 2021_09_16 每日一练


资料:Google and Uber have grabbed most of the attention regarding the advent of self-driving cars, but on Sunday, Lyft threw down the ultimate challenge: A majority of autonomous vehicles for Lyft within a mere five years.
   The bold claim was made by Lyft co-founder John Zimmer in a post on Medium outlining his company's vision for the next decade.
  "Within five years a fully autonomous fleet of cars will provide the majority of Lyft rides across the country," said Zimmer, indicating that early versions of such cars have been in operation in San Francisco and Phoenix.
  Usually when tech founders lay out their vision, it’s typical to hear grand claims that almost push the boundaries of believability. That's what tech innovation is about. But in the case of self-driving cars, the situation is a bit more complicated.
  Uber has already begun rolling out self-driving car tests in Pittsburgh and Google is hard at work on the same kind of solution on the West Coast. Therefore, talk of getting self-driving cars on the road is, at this point, less about the technology and more about logistics. We know Google has enough cash to triple down on any initiative it decides to tackle. And as the current ride-sharing leader in the U.S., Uber has enough market share-powered credibility that a future including self-driving Uber cars isn't unrealistic.
  Today there are some internet-based ride sharing system but to overcome the critical mass the system has to be real-time, automated and extremely easy to use.
  However in the case of Lyft, which continues to struggle against Uber (one report claims that Uber has over 80 percent market share in the U.S.), such a short timeline toward rolling out a fleet of self-driving cars seems somewhat ambitious. Nevertheless, Zimmer continues his vision essay with even more bold predictions.
  "By 2025, private car ownership will all but end in major U.S. cities," says Zimmer, a prediction that, if it turns out to be true, would mean it would take just eight years for the majority of the human-driven cars on U.S. roads to disappear. Possible? Sure. Likely? Eight years seems like, once again, a bit of wishful thinking on Zimmer's part.
  Remember, it hasn't even been 10 years since the arrival of the iPhone, and as recent events prove, smartphones are still a category that can yield catastrophic results if not done right. And those are just mobile devices, not vehicles entrusted with transporting and protecting human lives.
  To be fair, Zimmer's essay does offer some facts and figures in an attempt to back up his positions, but much of it doesn't appear to take into account variables such as the heavily embedded interests of automobile companies still relying on consumer auto sales, as well as the many legal and roadway logistics that will need to be addressed in order to bring about this massive transformation in such a short time.
  Oddly, Zimmer's vision does little to address the millions of human jobs that will be lost once self-driving cars displace not only taxi drivers, but truck drivers.
  "We believe that in the first five or more years following the introduction of autonomous vehicles, the need for human drivers will actually increase, not decrease," writes Zimmer. "When autonomous cars can only solve a portion of those trips, more Lyft drivers will be needed to provide service to the growing market of former car owners," writes Zimmer.
  But what about after five years, when autonomous cars can provide full service? What about the human drivers? The pushback from human drivers losing work will likely be another, major ripple in the evolution of self-driving cars, as well as other automated systems entering U.S. society in coming years.
  However, none of these logistical issues diminish Zimmer's ideas. His vision of the future of autonomous vehicles seems quite logical and in step with most who work in and watch the space closely. But the speed bump in accepting his vision wholesale is his ambitious self-driving car timeline in general, and for Lyft in particular.
 

A.arrange them neatly
B.present clearly
C.design correctly
D.suggest properly

查看答案

在处理实际问题时,往往不能“一刀切”的主要原因是(  )。

A.事物矛盾之间存在有机联系
B.事物矛盾具有特殊性
C.事物矛盾具有共同点
D.事物矛盾具有普遍性

查看答案

资料:Because of the biochemical reactions in your body that occur with every type of food you eat on a daily bases, some foods age you faster than your real age, while other foods help to fight aging.
Three of the processes that go on inside your body that have a major impact on your rate of aging are called “glycation”, “inflammation” and “oxidation”.
When we talk about aging, we’re not just talking about wrinkles on your skin or how thick your hair is, we’re also talking about factors that you can’t see, such as how well your organs function, and whether your joints are degrading.

What may make you feel 10 years older than your real age?

A.eating food on a daily basis.
B.often eating the improper foods.
C.biochemical reactions in your body.
D.starting to eat the right foods.

查看答案

所谓自然垄断是指(  )。

A.从经济上看允许多个企业存在,但从技术上不允许
B.从技术上看允许多个企业存在,但从经济上不允许
C.从技术上和经济上看都允许多个企业存在
D.从技术上和经济上看都只允许一个企业存在

查看答案

世界上第一个网上银行是英格兰银行。()

查看答案

记账以后,如果发现账簿记录的错误,是因记账凭证中的应借、应贷会计科目或记账方向有错误而引起的,应用( )进行更正。

A.借贷登记法
B.补充登记法
C.划线更正法
D.红字更正法

查看答案

当月亮运行到和太阳相对的方向,且地球和月亮的中心大致在同一条直线上,月亮就会进入地球的本影,此时可能产生( )。

A.日全食
B.月全食
C.月偏食
D.日偏食

查看答案

通俗地说,智力就是人的脑筋灵不灵。智力、智能、智慧,虽然用词不同,但其含义都是指 人的聪明才智。从心理学来看,智力指的是人的认识能力与活动能力所达到的水平。智 力是人们正常生活、学习、工作的最基本的心理条件,智力是人们与自然环境和社会环境 保持动态平衡的心理保证。因此,智力是衡量人的心理健康最重要的标准之一。一般说 来,智力超常与智力落后在人群中占少数,大多数人的智力是一般。
下面对于智力的说法不正确的一项是( )。
A.智力是指人的脑筋灵不灵,这是通俗的说法
B.心理学所讲的智力是指人的认识能力与活动能力所达到的水平
C.智力是衡量人的心理健康最重要的标准之一
D.智力落后的人在整个人群中占有很大的比例

查看答案