acca考试各科的考试难度怎么样呢?

发布时间:2021-03-11


acca考试各科的考试难度怎么样呢?


最佳答案

第一级 F1 F2 F3 如果准备时间绝对充分,这几门都有可能考到满分,不过ACCA的考试不是高考,再难有学生时代能专心考试的奢侈了。

第二级 F5 F6 F9 P1 看书加做题,容易做到准备充分。

第三级 F7 算F级9门考试比较难的一门,尤其对零会计基础的人来讲。若能花大量时间做ACCA历年真题,考试把握就会高些。

第四级 F8 P3 P7 我觉得这3门是一个分水岭,国内形成的应试方法至此已经完全不适用。考完后,好像自己思维方式发生重大变化(从死读书到开始喜欢独创自己的观点,应该是ACCA给人的最大收获)。

第五级 P2 部分知识点复杂,难以做到完全把握,除非有大量时间去研究练习册。

第六级 P6 挑战心态极限,考到后期已经坐不住板凳,而P6知识点零散,极度考验记忆力和总结能力。

跨到每一级时,都能感到明显的差异,考试风格也不一样。 F4踢出在外,排不进去,就是考验记忆的一门。

F级跟P级的差别,就是F级只要花足够时间去学习,及格都不成问题,问题是ACCA考试成绩目标想要多少分。但P级就有很多开放式答案,实在难说能掌握到什么程度。考试靠发挥、考心态、还有运气成分,但好像比F级更容易通过似的,花的时间反而少很多。P1P3P7,除去上课时间,都是一天搞定,真不知是纯属侥幸,还是这就正是P级的特点?若是不追求分数,把F级里学过的东西,通通综合起来,在套上些名家发表过的model, 联系一下理论,写一写就好了。只有P2 P6的确需要认真读书。考过后,反而觉得还是学F级9门收获较大。


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(b) Discuss the statements of the operational manager of Bonlandia and assess their implications for SSH.

(4 marks)

正确答案:
(b) In a market place such as that in which SSH competes, product and service quality assumes critical significance. Quality is
a key determinant of the financial results and the level of competitiveness achieved by SSH. This will always be the case and
therefore quality may be viewed as a strategic necessity if SSH is to prosper in the future. Therefore, the statements of the
manager of Bonlandia operations are myopic at best and unethical at worst! Businesses use software in a variety of different
ways but poor quality software can do serious harm to businesses. Much will depend on the extent to which a business uses
its information for strategic reasons as opposed to meeting operational needs. The more a business uses its information
systems for strategic reasons then the greater the potential damage suffered as a consequence of poor quality software. It is
wrong for the manager of Bonlandia operations to knowingly promote the installation of poor quality business software in
clients’ businesses. The effects can be costly to clients in terms of poor planning, control and decision-making with potential
losses of client goodwill and reputation.

(b) Given his recent diagnosis, advise Stuart as to which of the two proposed investments (Omikron plc/Omega

plc) would be the more tax efficient alternative. Give reasons for your choice. (3 marks)

正确答案:
(b) Both companies are listed. The only difference will be in the availability of inheritance tax relief – specifically business property
relief (BPR). If Stuart and Rebecca jointly hold in excess of 50% of the share capital of a listed company, BPR will apply at
the rate of 50%. Otherwise, no BPR is available.
Stuart can only buy 1,005,000 (£422,100/£0·42) shares in Omikron plc. This represents a shareholding of 2·00%
(1,005,000/50,250,000). As the shares in Omikron plc are listed, a 2% holding will not qualify for BPR.
At the moment, both Stuart and Rebecca own 2,400,000 shares in Omega plc. Their shareholdings are amalgamated for
IHT purposes under the related property rules. With a joint holding of 48%, BPR is not available. A further 200,001 shares
will be required to attain a 50% holding. Assuming Stuart and Rebecca can buy these shares, they must then hold their 50%
interest in the company for the period of at least two years in order to ensure that BPR applies.
On the basis that Stuart is expected to survive for two to three years, he should therefore buy further shares in Omega plc in
order to take advantage of the BPR available.

(d) Estimate by how much the bid might be increased without the shareholders of Paxis suffering a fall in their expected wealth, and discuss whether or not the directors of Paxis should proceed with the bid. (5 marks)

正确答案:

(d) The current bid values the shares of Wragger at £19·07 million, compared to the current market value of £15·36 million, a premium of £3·71 million. The expected synergy is £15,570,000. If these data are accurate the bid could be substantially increased without the shareholders of Paxis suffering a fall in their expected wealth. In theory, the bid could be increased by an additional £11,860,000, or 148 pence for each existing Wragger share.
There might also be strategic reasons for undertaking the bid, and the acquisition of Wragger might lead to future options that are not valued by the above analysis.
The proposed acquisition is expected to result in substantial synergy, and to create wealth for the shareholders of both companies. The directors are recommended to proceed with the bid.


声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。