信息!关于ACCA国际注册会计师证书有哪些介绍呢?快了解下!

发布时间:2020-05-15


目前有许多考生正在准备ACCA考试备考当中,而对于ACCA证书,大家了解多少呢?别着急,接下来让我们一起来了解有关ACCA证书吧!

由于ACCA在国内被称为国际注册会计师,是全球权威的财会金融领域的证书之一,更是国际认可范围高的财务人员资格证书。

对于ACCA当中的Chartered全称为RoyalCharter,指的是其会员得到英国皇室授予皇家特许名衔,这个只有部分顶尖的组织和机构才会被授予;

Certified为注册之意,指的是其会员行使的是具有法律效力的权益。ACCA在国内被称“国际注册会计师”ACCA会员在英国是被立法许可从事审计、投资顾问和破产执行的工作。ACCA会员资格得到欧盟立法以及许多国家公司法的承认。

有关联合国通过了以ACCA课程大纲为蓝本的《职业会计师专业教育国际大纲》,该大纲将作为世界各地职业会计师考试课程设置的一个衡量基准。

ACCA所使用的是国际会计准则IFRS,目前有全球有7500家认可ACCA的雇主企业,国内已超过700家。

由此可见对于财经类的资格证书,ACCA是有权威性和说服力的证书之一。面向国际的"职场黄金文凭"ACCA专业资格考试是权威的国际认证资格考试。

伴随中国经济金融国际化,在中国持有ACCA特许公认会计师资格证书象征着无与伦比的国际财经职业地位和广阔的职业发展机遇。

目前ACCA会员主要就业方向包括花旗银行、汇丰银行、渣打银行、工商银行、中国银行等大型国际国内金融机构。

对于阿里巴巴、通用电气、壳牌和联合利华等大型企业;和以四大会计师事务所为代表的国际财务金融服务机构。

ACCA资格被认为是"国际财会界的通行证"ACCA1988年进入中国以来,经历20余年快速发展,目前在中国拥有超过23000名会员及48000名学员,并在北京、上海、成都、广州、深圳、沈阳、香港以及澳门等地设有共11个办事处。

ACCA为全世界有志投身于财务、会计以及管理领域的专才提供首选的资格认证,一贯坚持最高的标准,提高财会人员的专业素质,职业操守以及监管能力,并秉承为公众利益服务的原则。

那么什么时候才能考完ACCA

ACCA近年的考试通过率来看,如果在没有免考的情况下,从F1-P阶段完成考试的时间大致是2-3年的时间。当然,如果有相应的免考机会,比如拥有CPAMPAcc等证书的话就可以免除一部分科目的考试。这样的话就能大大缩短时间,还能快速通过考试。

现如今,也会有基础知识薄弱,甚至是其他非财会专业的学员报考ACCA,这样的小伙伴一般会更焦虑和不安,但是大家要知道,ACCA的课程的学习是一个循序渐进的过程,重要的是坚持与积累,所以说零基础学习也并不会比拥有一定财会专业知识的人需要更多的学习时间。

好了,今日内容分享到这里就结束了,如果看完本篇文章还意犹未尽的话,也可到帮考官网进行详细探讨,祝大家考试成功,一切顺利吧。


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(b) Calculate the percentage of maximum capacity at which the zoo will break even during the year ending

30 November 2007. You should assume that 50% of the revenue from sales of ticket type ZC is attributable

to the zoo. (7 marks)

正确答案:

(b) For this part, assume today’s date is 1 May 2010.

Bill and Ben decided not to sell their company, and instead expanded the business themselves. Ben, however,

is now pursuing other interests, and is no longer involved with the day to day activities of Flower Limited. Bill

believes that the company would be better off without Ben as a voting shareholder, and wishes to buy Ben’s

shares. However, Bill does not have sufficient funds to buy the shares himself, and so is wondering if the

company could acquire the shares instead.

The proposed price for Ben’s shares would be £500,000. Both Bill and Ben pay income tax at the higher rate.

Required:

Write a letter to Ben:

(1) stating the income tax (IT) and/or capital gains tax (CGT) implications for Ben if Flower Limited were to

repurchase his 50% holding of ordinary shares, immediately in May 2010; and

(2) advising him of any available planning options that might improve this tax position. Clearly explain any

conditions which must be satisfied and quantify the tax savings which may result.

(13 marks)

Assume that the corporation tax rates for the financial year 2005 and the income tax rates and allowances

for the tax year 2005/06 apply throughout this question.

正确答案:

(b) [Ben’s address]                                                                                                     [Firm’s address]
Dear Ben                                                                                                                              [Date]
A company purchase of own shares can be subject to capital gains treatment if certain conditions are satisfied. However, one
of these conditions is that the shares in question must have been held for a minimum period of five years. As at 1 May 2010,
your shares in Flower Limited have only been held for four years and ten months. As a result, the capital gains treatment will
not apply.
In the absence of capital gains treatment, the position on a company repurchase of its own shares is that the payment will
be treated as an income distribution (i.e. a dividend) in the hands of the recipient. The distribution element is calculated as
the proceeds received for the shares less the price paid for them. On the basis that the purchase price is £500,000, then the
element of distribution will be £499,500 (500,000 – 500). This would be taxed as follows:


(ii) The use of the trading loss of Tethys Ltd for the year ending 31 December 2008; (6 marks)

正确答案:
(ii) Tethys Ltd – Use of trading loss
– The two companies will not be in a group relief group as Saturn Ltd will not own 75% of Tethys Ltd.
– For a consortium to exist, 75% of the ordinary share capital of Tethys Ltd must be held by companies which each
hold at least 5%. Accordingly, Tethys Ltd will be a consortium company if the balance of its share capital is owned
by Clangers Ltd but not if it is owned by Edith Clanger.
– If Tethys Ltd qualifies as a consortium company: 65% of its trading losses in the period from 1 August 2008 to
31 December 2008 can be surrendered to Saturn Ltd, i.e. £21,667 (£80,000 x 5/12 x 65%).
– If Tethys Ltd does not qualify as a consortium company: none of its loss can be surrendered to Saturn Ltd.
– The acquisition of 65% of Tethys Ltd is a change in ownership of the company. If there is a major change in the
nature or conduct of the trade of Tethys Ltd within three years of 1 August 2008, the loss arising prior to that date
cannot be carried forward for relief in the future.
Further information required:
– Ownership of the balance of the share capital of Tethys Ltd.

(b) Assess the benefits of the separation of the roles of chief executive and chairman that Alliya Yongvanich

argued for and explain her belief that ‘accountability to shareholders’ is increased by the separation of these

roles. (12 marks)

正确答案:
(b) Separation of the roles of CEO and chairman
Benefits of separation of roles
The separation of the roles of chief executive and chairman was first provided for in the UK by the 1992 Cadbury provisions
although it has been included in all codes since. Most relevant to the case is the terms of the ICGN clause s.11 and OECD
VI (E) both of which provide for the separation of these roles. In the UK it is covered in the combined code section A2.
The separation of roles offers the benefit that it frees up the chief executive to fully concentrate on the management of the
organisation without the necessity to report to shareholders or otherwise become distracted from his or her executive
responsibilities. The arrangement provides a position (that of chairman) that is expected to represent shareholders’ interests
and that is the point of contact into the company for shareholders. Some codes also require the chairman to represent the
interests of other stakeholders such as employees.
Having two people rather than one at the head of a large organisation removes the risks of ‘unfettered powers’ being
concentrated in a single individual and this is an important safeguard for investors concerned with excessive secrecy or
lack of transparency and accountability. The case of Robert Maxwell is a good illustration of a single dominating
executive chairman operating unchallenged and, in so doing, acting illegally. Having the two roles separated reduces
the risk of a conflict of interest in a single person being responsible for company performance whilst also reporting on
that performance to markets. Finally, the chairman provides a conduit for the concerns of non-executive directors who,
in turn, provide an important external representation of external concerns on boards of directors.
Tutorial note: Reference to codes other than the UK is also acceptable. In all cases, detailed (clause number) knowledge
of code provisions is not required.
Accountability and separation of roles
In terms of the separation of roles assisting in the accountability to shareholders, four points can be made.
The chairman scrutinises the chief executive’s management performance on behalf of the shareholders and will be
involved in approving the design of the chief executive’s reward package. It is the responsibility of the chairman to hold
the chief executive to account on shareholders’ behalfs.
Shareholders have an identified person (chairman) to hold accountable for the performance of their investment. Whilst
day-to-day contact will normally be with the investor relations department (or its equivalent) they can ultimately hold
the chairman to account.
The presence of a separate chairman ensures that a system is in place to ensure NEDs have a person to report to outside the
executive structure. This encourages the freedom of expression of NEDs to the chairman and this, in turn, enables issues to
be raised and acted upon when necessary.
The chairman is legally accountable and, in most cases, an experienced person. He/she can be independent and more
dispassionate because he or she is not intimately involved with day-to-day management issues.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。