你知道ACCA可以申请哪些大学学历吗?

发布时间:2020-04-11


好消息!好消息!ACCA可以申请这些大学的学历,快来看看有你心仪的学校吗?接下来51题库考试学习网将为你分享相关资讯,详情如下:

报名注册ACCA考试,具备以下条件之一即可:

1)凡具有教育部承认的大专以上学历,即可报名成为ACCA的正式学员;

2)教育部认可的高等院校在校生,顺利完成大一的课程考试,即可报名成为ACCA的正式学员;

3)未符合1、2项报名资格的16周岁以上的申请者,也可以先申请参加FIA(Foundations in Accountancy)基础财务资格考试。在完成基础商业会计(FAB)、基础管理会计(FMA)、基础财务会计(FFA)3门课程,并完成ACCA基础职业模块,可获得ACCA商业会计师资格证书(Diploma in Accounting and Business),资格证书后可豁免ACCAF1-F3三门课程的考试,直接进入技能课程的考试。

具有ACCA专业的大学:(不代表学习排名) 中央财经大学 武汉大学 华中科技大学 厦门大学 重庆大学 鲁东大学 上海外国语大学 西安交通大学 湖南大学 暨南大学 中南财经政法大学 武汉理工大学 东北大学 西南大学 四川师范大学 南昌大学 四川大学 兰州大学 集美大学 上海海事大学 东华大学 新疆财经大学 对外经济贸易大学 上海财经大学 辽宁大学 湖北大学 浙江工商大学 江苏大学 西南财经大学天府学院 武汉纺织大学 云南大学 河南财经政法大学 南京大学 四川大学锦城学院 南京财经大学 宁波大学 南京审计学院 西安欧亚学院 湖北经济学院 中山大学南方学院 广西财经学院 湖南农业大学 西安外国语大学 江西科技师范大学 华东交通大学 山东工商学院 江西财经大学 广西大学商学院 广东技术师范学院 广东外语外贸大学 重庆工商大学 西南科技大学 湖南商学院 西安工业大学 上海对外贸易大学 上海大学悉尼工商学院 北京师范大学珠海分校 东北财经大学 哈尔滨商业大学 天津外国语大学 大连外国语大学 重庆理工大学 沈阳大学 郑州航空工业管理学院 浙江财经学院 贵州财经学院 广东商学院 湖南财政经济学院 首都经济贸易大学 云南财经大学 宜宾学院 中山大学管理学院 河北金融学院 天津财经大学 上海立信会计学院 长沙大学 上海商学院 河北科技师范学院财经学院 成都信息工程学院 北京物资学院 内蒙古财经大学 上海财经大学浙江学院 中山大学国际商学院 四川大学锦江学院 中国海洋大学管理学院 四川外语学院 大连民族学院 青岛理工大学琴岛学院 青岛大学经济学院 江南大学太湖学院

今天的分享到这里就结束了,以上就是51题库考试学习网为大家分享的ACCA可以申请哪些学校学历的相关内容,不知道有没有帮助到你呢?还有疑问的小伙伴请多多关注51题库考试学习网,我们会持续更新。


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(c) Discuss the factors that might influence whether the initial bid is likely to be accepted by the shareholders of Wragger plc.

正确答案:

(c) The type of payment might influence the success of the bid. Paxis is proposing a share for share exchange which offers a continuation in ownership of the entity, albeit as part of the successful bidder. However, relative share prices will change during the period of the bid, and the owner of shares in the potential victim company will not know the precise postacquisition value of the bid. An alternative might be cash payments which provides a known, precise sum, and might be favoured for this reason. However, in some countries payment in cash might lead to an immediate capital gains tax liability for the investor.

The effective price offered would of course be a major influence. Paxis would need to offer a premium over the existing share price, but the size of the premium that would be acceptable is unknown. Informal discussions with major shareholders of Wragger might assist in determining this (subject to such discussions being permitted by the regulatory authorities).


(ii) Assuming the new structure is implemented with effect from 1 August 2006, calculate the level of

management charge that should be made by Bold plc to Linden Limited for the year ended 31 July

2007, so as to minimise the group’s overall corporation tax (CT) liability for that year. (2 marks)

正确答案:
(ii) For the year ended 31 July 2007, there will be two associated companies in the group. Bold plc will count as an
associated company as it is not dormant throughout the period in question. As a result, the corporation tax limits will be
divided by two (i.e. the number of associates) giving an upper limit of £750,000 (£1·5 million/2). As Linden Limited
is anticipated to make profits of £1·4 million in the year to 31 July 2007 it will pay corporation tax at the rate of 30%.
Bold plc can earn trading profits up to £150,000 (£300,000/2) and pay tax at the rate of 19%. It will therefore
minimise the group’s corporation tax liability if maximum use is made of this small companies rate band, as it will save
£16,500 (150,000 x (30% – 19%)) of corporation tax for the year to 31 July 2007. Bold plc should therefore make
a management charge of sufficient size to give it profits for that year equal to £150,000.
While the transfer pricing legislation no longer applies to small and medium sized enterprises, Bold plc should
nevertheless ensure that there is evidence to support the actual charge made in terms of the services provided.

(ii) Evaluate the relative advantages and disadvantages of Chen’s risk management committee being

non-executive rather than executive in nature. (7 marks)

正确答案:
(ii) Advantages and disadvantages of being non-executive rather than executive
The UK Combined Code, for example, allows for risk committees to be made up of either executive or non-executive
members.
Advantages of non-executive membership
Separation and detachment from the content being discussed is more likely to bring independent scrutiny.
Sensitive issues relating to one or more areas of executive oversight can be aired without vested interests being present.
Non-executive directors often bring specific expertise that will be more relevant to a risk problem than more
operationally-minded executive directors will have.
Chen’s four members, being from different backgrounds, are likely to bring a range of perspectives and suggested
strategies which may enrich the options open to the committee when considering specific risks.
Disadvantages of non-executive membership (advantages of executive membership)
Direct input and relevant information would be available from executives working directly with the products, systems
and procedures being discussed if they were on the committee. Non-executives are less likely to have specialist
knowledge of products, systems and procedures being discussed and will therefore be less likely to be able to comment
intelligently during meetings.
The membership, of four people, none of whom ‘had direct experience of Chen’s industry or products’ could produce
decisions taken without relevant information that an executive member could provide.
Non-executive directors will need to report their findings to the executive board. This reporting stage slows down the
process, thus requiring more time before actions can be implemented, and introducing the possibility of some
misunderstanding.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。