自学ACCA可以吗?它究竟有多难?了解一下吧!

发布时间:2020-01-03



ACCA官方对于学员是否自学又或是报班学习并没有硬性规定。不过,大部分学员还是会优先考虑报班学习。最主要的因素就是因为ACCA共有13门考试,考试周期一般可达2-3年,所以对于很多考生来讲都比较希望尽快拿到ACCA证书。 自学ACCA会不会很难?这是很多同学担心的问题,接下来,51题库考试学习网来介绍一下吧!

从以往的ACCA学员自学的列子来看,有的同学是自学的,有的人是一边上班一边学习的。不过这种情况比较适用于有一定自制能力的学员。另外,还有一部分人觉得ACCA是全英文考试会比较难,其实ACCA自学对于英语的要求不是非常的高,关键还是要记住一些相关会计专业的专业名词,如:常常出现的那种,但是还是要平时多多的积累了。

ACCA最重要的不是基础,而是时间和毅力,个人认为如果专业课很紧,可能会无法坚持完成ACCA的课程。自学的可能性当然是有的,没有什么事情是不可能的,但是难度肯定很大。

自学ACCA会遇到哪些问题:

首先自学没有督促,因为ACCA的考试周期长,其优势当然是人性化,但是弊端会造成惰性,可能专业学习忙了就会自我安慰,暂时放一下ACCA之类的,在自学者中这点尤其显著,可能会因此导致最终放弃。

其次,自学一旦碰到问题很难有效地、及时地解决。不过,ACCA课程设置的是由零开始,由浅入深的,非常有利于我们自学自考。当然要想自学ACCA,你首先要确保自己能做到面这几点:

1.有明确的目标,并强烈向往

升职加薪或是学习更专业的知识、深化财务技能或是谋求职业转型、拓展前路,不管你考ACCA的初衷是什么,一定要想清楚再做决定。ACCA考试科目多,战线拉得也比较长,一定要坚定目标。

2.不要给自己找借口

手机是认真学习最大的“杀手”,要想专心备战ACCA考试,第一步就是要坚决抵制手机的诱惑。如果需要用手机看课件、文档和网课视频,建议下载下来,离线观看。避免外部打扰,心猿意马。还有最重要的一点是,不要给自己找不想学习的借口,不想学习的借口可以找到很多,但认真学习的理由只有一个。

3.养成学习习惯

最开始学习,会有足够的动力来支撑。但万事难在坚持,一方面我们应允许自己有拖延的冲动,但坚决不对它妥协,初期制定计划可预留出大战拖延的余地。另一方面,我们还可以在成功坚持一次时给自己一点奖励,比如在周末晚上的一部电影、一场篮球等——从自律中收获的成就感和激励能帮助我们更好地坚持。

以上就是今天的内容,希望对想要自学ACCA的同学有帮助。如果还想了解更多信息,欢迎来51题库考试学习网留言。



下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

4 At an academic conference, a debate took place on the implementation of corporate governance practices in

developing countries. Professor James West from North America argued that one of the key needs for developing

countries was to implement rigorous systems of corporate governance to underpin investor confidence in businesses

in those countries. If they did not, he warned, there would be no lasting economic growth as potential foreign inward

investors would be discouraged from investing.

In reply, Professor Amy Leroi, herself from a developing country, reported that many developing countries are

discussing these issues at governmental level. One issue, she said, was about whether to adopt a rules-based or a

principles-based approach. She pointed to evidence highlighting a reduced number of small and medium sized initial

public offerings in New York compared to significant growth in London. She suggested that this change could be

attributed to the costs of complying with Sarbanes-Oxley in the United States and that over-regulation would be the

last thing that a developing country would need. She concluded that a principles-based approach, such as in the

United Kingdom, was preferable for developing countries.

Professor Leroi drew attention to an important section of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to illustrate her point. The key

requirement of that section was to externally report on – and have attested (verified) – internal controls. This was, she

argued, far too ambitious for small and medium companies that tended to dominate the economies of developing

countries.

Professor West countered by saying that whilst Sarbanes-Oxley may have had some problems, it remained the case

that it regulated corporate governance in the ‘largest and most successful economy in the world’. He said that rules

will sometimes be hard to follow but that is no reason to abandon them in favour of what he referred to as ‘softer’

approaches.

(a) There are arguments for both rules and principles-based approaches to corporate governance.

Required:

(i) Describe the essential features of a rules-based approach to corporate governance; (3 marks)

正确答案:
(a) (i) Describe rules-based
In a rules-based jurisdiction, corporate governance provisions are legally binding and enforceable in law.
Non-compliance is punishable by fines or ultimately (in extremis) by delisting and director prosecutions.
There is limited latitude for interpretation of the provisions to match individual circumstances (‘one size fits all’). Some
have described this as a ‘box ticking’ exercise as companies seek to comply despite some provisions applying to their
individual circumstances more than others.
Investor confidence is underpinned by the quality of the legislation rather than the degree of compliance (which will be
total for the most part).

(b) Discuss the key issues which will need to be addressed in determining the basic components of an

internationally agreed conceptual framework. (10 marks)

Appropriateness and quality of discussion. (2 marks)

正确答案:
(b) There are several issues which have to be addressed if an international conceptual framework is to be successfully developed.
These are:
(i) Objectives
Agreement will be required as to whether financial statements are to be produced for shareholders or a wide range of
users and whether decision usefulness is the key criteria or stewardship. Additionally there is the question of whether
the objective is to provide information in making credit and investment decisions.
(ii) Qualitative Characteristics
The qualities to be sought in making decisions about financial reporting need to be determined. The decision usefulness
of financial reports is determined by these characteristics. There are issues concerning the trade-offs between relevance
and reliability. An example of this concerns the use of fair values and historical costs. It has been argued that historical
costs are more reliable although not as relevant as fair values. Additionally there is a conflict between neutrality and the
traditions of prudence or conservatism. These characteristics are constrained by materiality and benefits that justify
costs.
(iii) Definitions of the elements of financial statements
The principles behind the definition of the elements need agreement. There are issues concerning whether ‘control’
should be included in the definition of an asset or become part of the recognition criteria. Also the definition of ‘control’
is an issue particularly with financial instruments. For example, does the holder of a call option ‘control’ the underlying
asset? Some of the IASB’s standards contravene its own conceptual framework. IFRS3 requires the capitalisation of
goodwill as an asset despite the fact that it can be argued that goodwill does not meet the definition of an asset in the
Framework. IAS12 requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities that do not meet the liability definition. Similarly
equity and liabilities need to be capable of being clearly distinguished. Certain financial instruments could either be
liabilities or equity. For example obligations settled in shares.
(iv) Recognition and De-recognition
The principles of recognition and de-recognition of assets and liabilities need reviewing. Most frameworks have
recognition criteria, but there are issues over the timing of recognition. For example, should an asset be recognised when
a value can be placed on it or when a cost has been incurred? If an asset or liability does not meet recognition criteria
when acquired or incurred, what subsequent event causes the asset or liability to be recognised? Most frameworks do
not discuss de-recognition. (The IASB’s Framework does not discuss the issue.) It can be argued that an item should be
de-recognised when it does not meet the recognition criteria, but financial instruments standards (IAS39) require other
factors to occur before financial assets can be de-recognised. Different attributes should be considered such as legal
ownership, control, risks or rewards.
(v) Measurement
More detailed discussion of the use of measurement concepts, such as historical cost, fair value, current cost, etc are
required and also more guidance on measurement techniques. Measurement concepts should address initial
measurement and subsequent measurement in the form. of revaluations, impairment and depreciation which in turn
gives rise to issues about classification of gains or losses in income or in equity.
(vi) Reporting entity
Issues have arisen over what sorts of entities should issue financial statements, and which entities should be included
in consolidated financial statements. A question arises as to whether the legal entity or the economic unit should be the
reporting unit. Complex business arrangements raise issues over what entities should be consolidated and the basis
upon which entities are consolidated. For example, should the basis of consolidation be ‘control’ and what does ‘control’
mean?
(vii) Presentation and disclosure
Financial reporting should provide information that enables users to assess the amounts, timing and uncertainty of the
entity’s future cash flows, its assets, liabilities and equity. It should provide management explanations and the limitations
of the information in the reports. Discussions as to the boundaries of presentation and disclosure are required.

(b) Advise on the capital gains implications should Trent Limited’s old building be sold as proposed. Support your

advice with relevant calculations. (4 marks)

正确答案:

 

This gives a higher post-entry loss of £50,000 (150,000 – 100,000) and so it is advisable for Trent Limited to make
this election.
The £100,000 of pre-entry losses are still available, but can only be set against gains on assets which:
(i) Trent Limited sold prior to being acquired (subject to the normal carry back restrictions), or
(ii) Trent Limited already owned when it was acquired, or
(iii) Trent Limited acquired from outside the group and used in its trade after being bought by Tay Limited.


声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。