ACCA考试常用公式汇总,值得陕西省考生收藏!

发布时间:2020-01-10


距离2020年3月份的ACCA考试还有两个多月左右的时间,想必备考ACCA的同学们正在如火如荼地进行着复习。那么,今天这条“公式宝典”你一定要收好,或许会帮助你成功通过ACCA考试哦!接下来,51题库考试学习网将这份“公式宝典”分享给大家:

因为ACCA考试毕竟是国际性质的考试,因此一些题的计算可能就存在不同的计算方式,计算方式的不同也会导致结果的不同。

一、境内

1、税额=销项税-进项税

2、销项税=销售额×税率

3、视销征税无销额(1)当月类平均;(2)近类货平均,(3)组税价=成本×(1+成利率)

4、征增税及消税:

组税价=成本×(1+成润率)+消税

组税价=成本×(1+成润率)/(1-消率)

5、含税额换

不含税销额=含税销额/1+(一般)

不含税销额=含税销额/1+征率(小规模)

6、购农销农品,或向小纳人购农品:

准扣的进税=买价×扣率(13%)

7、一般纳人外购货物付的运费

准扣的进税=运费×扣除率

*随运付的装卸、保费不扣

8、小纳人纳额=销项额×征率(6%4%)

*不扣进额

9、小纳人不含税销额=含额/(1+征率)

10、自来水公司销水(6%)

不含税销额=发票额×(1+征率)

以上是国内物品的计算方式,接下来是国外进口的相关公式

二、进口货

1、组税价=关税完价+关税+消税

2、纳额=组税价×税率

三、出口货物退()

1"免、抵、退"计算方法(指生产企自营委外贸代出口自产)

(1)纳额=内销销税-(进税-免抵退税不免、抵税)

(2)免抵退税=FOB×外汇RMB牌价×退率-免抵退税抵减额

*FOB:出口货物离岸价。

*免抵退税抵减额=免税购原料价×退税率

免税购原料=国内购免原料+进料加工免税进料

进料加工免税进口料件组税价=到岸价+关、消税

(3)应退税和免抵税

A、如期末留抵税≤免抵退税,则:

应退税=期末留抵税

免抵税=免抵退税-应退税

B、期末留抵税>免抵退税,则:

应退税=免抵退税

免抵税=0

*期末留抵税额据《增值税纳税申报表》中"期末留抵税额"定。

(4)免抵退税不得免和抵税

免抵退税不免和抵税=FOB×外汇RMB牌价×(出口征率-出口退率)-免抵退税不免抵税抵减额

免抵退税不免和抵扣税抵减额=免税进原料价×(出口征率-出口货物退率)

2、先征后退

(1)外贸及外贸制度工贸企购货出口,出口增税免;出口后按收购成本与退税率算退税还外贸,征、退税差计企业成本

应退税额=外贸购不含增税购进金额×退税率

(2)外贸企购小纳人出货口增税退税规定:

A、从小纳人购并持普通发票准退税的抽纱、工艺品等12类出口货物,销售出口货入免,退还出口货进税

退税=[发票列(含税)销额]/(1+征率)×6%5%

B、从小纳人购代开的增税发票的出口货:

退税=增税发票金额×6%5%

C、外企托生企加工出口货的退税规定:

原辅料退税=国内原辅料增税发票进项×原辅料退税率

以上这些就是全部ACCA考试常用公式,希望对大家有所帮助!最后51题库考试学习网想告诉大家:放弃可以找到一万个理由,但坚持只需一个信念!致敬那些在ACCA备考路上永不放弃的人,好结果只留给有毅力的人。


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

The finance director of Blod Co, Uma Thorton, has requested that your firm type the financial statements in the form

to be presented to shareholders at the forthcoming company general meeting. Uma has also commented that the

previous auditors did not use a liability disclaimer in their audit report, and would like more information about the use

of liability disclaimer paragraphs.

Required:

(b) Discuss the ethical issues raised by the request for your firm to type the financial statements of Blod Co.

(3 marks)

正确答案:
(b) It is not uncommon for audit firms to word process and typeset the financial statements of their clients, especially where the
client is a relatively small entity, which may lack the resources and skills to perform. this task. It is not prohibited by ethical
standards.
However, there could be a perceived threat to independence, with risk magnified in the case of Blod Co, which is a listed
company. The auditors could be perceived to be involved with the preparation of the financial statements of a listed client
company, which is prohibited by ethical standards. IFAC’s Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants states that for a listed
client, the audit firm should not be involved with the preparation of financial statements, which would create a self-review
threat so severe that safeguards could not reduce the threat to an acceptable level. Although the typing of financial statements
itself is not prohibited by ethical guidance, the risk is that providing such a service could be perceived to be an element of
the preparation of the financial statements.
It is possible that during the process of typing the financial statements, decisions and judgments would be made. This could
be perceived as making management decisions in relation to the financial statements, a clear breach of independence.
Therefore to eliminate any risk exposure, the prudent decision would be not to type the financial statements, ensuring that
Blod Co appreciates the ethical problems that this would cause.
Tutorial note: This is an area not specifically covered by ethical guides, where different audit firms may have different views
on whether it is acceptable to provide a typing service for the financial statements of their clients. Credit will be awarded for
sensible discussion of the issues raised bearing in mind other options for the audit firm, for example, it could be argued that
it is acceptable to offer the typing service provided that it is performed by people independent of the audit team, and that
the matter has been discussed with the audit committee/those charged with governance

(b) Discuss the statements of the operational manager of Bonlandia and assess their implications for SSH.

(4 marks)

正确答案:
(b) In a market place such as that in which SSH competes, product and service quality assumes critical significance. Quality is
a key determinant of the financial results and the level of competitiveness achieved by SSH. This will always be the case and
therefore quality may be viewed as a strategic necessity if SSH is to prosper in the future. Therefore, the statements of the
manager of Bonlandia operations are myopic at best and unethical at worst! Businesses use software in a variety of different
ways but poor quality software can do serious harm to businesses. Much will depend on the extent to which a business uses
its information for strategic reasons as opposed to meeting operational needs. The more a business uses its information
systems for strategic reasons then the greater the potential damage suffered as a consequence of poor quality software. It is
wrong for the manager of Bonlandia operations to knowingly promote the installation of poor quality business software in
clients’ businesses. The effects can be costly to clients in terms of poor planning, control and decision-making with potential
losses of client goodwill and reputation.

2 The Rubber Group (TRG) manufactures and sells a number of rubber-based products. Its strategic focus is channelled

through profit centres which sell products transferred from production divisions that are operated as cost centres. The

profit centres are the primary value-adding part of the business, where commercial profit centre managers are

responsible for the generation of a contribution margin sufficient to earn the target return of TRG. The target return is

calculated after allowing for the sum of the agreed budgeted cost of production at production divisions, plus the cost

of marketing, selling and distribution costs and central services costs.

The Bettamould Division is part of TRG and manufactures moulded products that it transfers to profit centres at an

agreed cost per tonne. The agreed cost per tonne is set following discussion between management of the Bettamould

Division and senior management of TRG.

The following information relates to the agreed budget for the Bettamould Division for the year ending 30 June 2009:

(1) The budgeted output of moulded products to be transferred to profit centres is 100,000 tonnes. The budgeted

transfer cost has been agreed on a two-part basis as follows:

(i) A standard variable cost of $200 per tonne of moulded products;

(ii) A lump sum annual charge of $50,000,000 in respect of fixed costs, which is charged to profit centres, at

$500 per tonne of moulded products.

(2) Budgeted standard variable costs (as quoted in 1 above) have been set after incorporating each of the following:

(i) A provision in respect of processing losses amounting to 15% of material inputs. Materials are sourced on

a JIT basis from chosen suppliers who have been used for some years. It is felt that the 15% level of losses

is necessary because the ageing of the machinery will lead to a reduction in the efficiency of output levels.

(ii) A provision in respect of machine idle time amounting to 5%. This is incorporated into variable machine

costs. The idle time allowance is held at the 5% level partly through elements of ‘real-time’ maintenance

undertaken by the machine operating teams as part of their job specification.

(3) Quality checks are carried out on a daily basis on 25% of throughput tonnes of moulded products.

(4) All employees and management have contracts based on fixed annual salary agreements. In addition, a bonus

of 5% of salary is payable as long as the budgeted output of 100,000 tonnes has been achieved;

(5) Additional information relating to the points in (2) above (but NOT included in the budget for the year ending

30 June 2009) is as follows:

(i) There is evidence that materials of an equivalent specification could be sourced for 40% of the annual

requirement at the Bettamould Division, from another division within TRG which has spare capacity.

(ii) There is evidence that a move to machine maintenance being outsourced from a specialist company could

help reduce machine idle time and hence allow the possibility of annual output in excess of 100,000 tonnes

of moulded products.

(iii) It is thought that the current level of quality checks (25% of throughput on a daily basis) is vital, although

current evidence shows that some competitor companies are able to achieve consistent acceptable quality

with a quality check level of only 10% of throughput on a daily basis.

The directors of TRG have decided to investigate claims relating to the use of budgeting within organisations which

have featured in recent literature. A summary of relevant points from the literature is contained in the following

statement:

‘The use of budgets as part of a ‘performance contract’ between an organisation and its managers may be seen as a

practice that causes management action which might lead to the following problems:

(a) Meeting only the lowest targets

(b) Using more resources than necessary

(c) Making the bonus – whatever it takes

(d) Competing against other divisions, business units and departments

(e) Ensuring that what is in the budget is spent

(f) Providing inaccurate forecasts

(g) Meeting the target, but not beating it

(h) Avoiding risks.’

Required:

(a) Explain the nature of any SIX of the eight problems listed above relating to the use of budgeting;

(12 marks)

正确答案:
2 Suggested answer content for each of the eight problems contained within the scenario is as follows:
(a) The nature of each of the problems relating to the use of budgeting is as follows:
Meeting only the lowest targets
– infers that once a budget has been negotiated, the budget holder will be satisfied with this level of performance unless
there is good reason to achieve a higher standard.
Using more resources than necessary
– Once the budget has been agreed the focus will be to ensure that the budgeted utilisation of resources has been adhered
to. Indeed the current system does not provide a specific incentive not to exceed the budget level. It may be, however,
that failure to achieve budget targets would reflect badly on factors such as future promotion prospects or job security.
Making the bonus – whatever it takes
– A bonus system is linked to the budget setting and achievement process might lead to actions by employees and
management which they regard as ‘fair game’. This is because they view the maximisation of bonuses as the main
priority in any aspect of budget setting or work output.
Competing against other divisions, business units and departments
– Competition may manifest itself through the attitudes adopted in relation to transfer pricing of goods/services between
divisions, lack of willingness to co-operate on sharing information relating to methods, sources of supply, expertise, etc.
Ensuring that what is in the budget is spent
– Management may see the budget setting process as a competition for resources. Irrespective of the budgeting method
used, there will be a tendency to feel that unless the budget allowance for one year is spent, there will be imposed
reductions in the following year. This will be particularly relevant in the case of fixed cost areas where expenditure is
viewed as discretionary to some extent.
Providing inaccurate forecasts
– This infers that some aspects of budgeting problems such as ‘Gaming’ and ‘misrepresentation’ may be employed by the
budget holder in order to gain some advantage. Gaming may be seen as a deliberate distortion of the measure in order
to secure some strategic advantage. Misrepresentation refers to creative planning in order to suggest that the measure
is acceptable.
Meeting the target but not beating it
– There may be a view held by those involved in the achievement of the budget target that there is no incentive for them
to exceed that level of effectiveness.
Avoiding risks
– There may be a prevailing view by those involved in the achievement of the budget target that wherever possible
strategies incorporated into the achievement of the budget objective should be left unchanged if they have been shown
to be acceptable in the past. Change may be viewed as increasing the level of uncertainty that the proposed budget
target will be achievable.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。