网友您好， 请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目：
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
In order to“change lives for the better”and reduce“dependency”George Osborne,Chancellor of the Exchequer,introduced the“upfront work search”scheme.Only if the jobless arrive at the jobcentre with a CV,register for online job search,and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly.What could be more reasonable?
More apparent reasonableness followed.There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance.“Those first few days should be spent looking for work,not looking to sign on.”he claimed.“We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.”Help?Really?On first hearing,this was the socially concerned chancellor,trying to change lives for the better,complete with“reforms”to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work,and subsidises laziness.What motivated him,we were to understand,was his zeal for“fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer,controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.
Losing a job is hurting:you don’t skip down to the jobcentre with a song in your heart,delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state.It is financially terrifying,psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.You are now not wanted;you support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.You are now not wanted;you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life.Worse,the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared.Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always:a job.
But in Osborneland,your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood.It is as though 20 years of ever-tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened.The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens.Even the very phrase“jobseeker’s allowance”—invented in 1996—is about redefining the unemployed as a“jobseeker”who had no mandatory right to a benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions.Instead,the claimant receives a time-limited“allowance,”conditional on actively seeking a job;no entitlement and no insurance,at￡71.70 a week,one of the least generous in the EU.
According to Paragraph 3,being unemployed makes one feel
More apparent reasonableness followed.There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance.“Those first few days should be spent looking for work,not looking to sign on.”he claimed.“We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.”Help?Really?On first hearing,this was the socially concerned chancellor,trying to change lives for the better,complete with“reforms”to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work,and subsidises laziness.What motivated him,we were to understand,was his zeal for“fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer,controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.
Losing a job is hurting:you don’t skip down to the jobcentre with a song in your heart,delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state.It is financially terrifying,psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.You are now not wanted;you support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.You are now not wanted;you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life.Worse,the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared.Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always:a job.
But in Osborneland,your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood.It is as though 20 years of ever-tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened.The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens.Even the very phrase“jobseeker’s allowance”—invented in 1996—is about redefining the unemployed as a“jobseeker”who had no mandatory right to a benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions.Instead,the claimant receives a time-limited“allowance,”conditional on actively seeking a job;no entitlement and no insurance,at￡71.70 a week,one of the least generous in the EU.
According to Paragraph 3,being unemployed makes one feel
A.uneasy
B.enraged.
C.insulted.
D.guilty.
B.enraged.
C.insulted.
D.guilty.
参考答案
参考解析
解析：事实细节根据题干，我们回到原文第三段，原文中“Losing a job is hurting”；“It is financially terrifying,psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.”；“Worse,the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared.”，原文中hurting，terrifying，embarrassing，minimal，hard to get，worse，disappeared等均是一些表示负面情绪的词，就奠定了整段内容的基调，因此我们看选项，很容易得出选项B“心神不安的”正是原文出现的一些词汇的同义替换。而其它三个选项“受侮辱的”、“激愤的”、“内疚有罪的”均与原文所表达的沮丧、心神不安的心情不符合，故排除。
更多 “In order to“change lives for the better”and reduce“dependency”George Osborne,Chancellor of the Exchequer,introduced the“upfront work search”scheme.Only if the jobless arrive at the jobcentre with a CV,register for online job search,and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly.What could be more reasonable? More apparent reasonableness followed.There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance.“Those first few days should be spent looking for work,not looking to sign on.”he claimed.“We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.”Help?Really?On first hearing,this was the socially concerned chancellor,trying to change lives for the better,complete with“reforms”to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work,and subsidises laziness.What motivated him,we were to understand,was his zeal for“fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer,controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits. Losing a job is hurting:you don’t skip down to the jobcentre with a song in your heart,delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state.It is financially terrifying,psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.You are now not wanted;you support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.You are now not wanted;you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life.Worse,the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared.Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always:a job. But in Osborneland,your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood.It is as though 20 years of ever-tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened.The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens.Even the very phrase“jobseeker’s allowance”—invented in 1996—is about redefining the unemployed as a“jobseeker”who had no mandatory right to a benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions.Instead,the claimant receives a time-limited“allowance,”conditional on actively seeking a job;no entitlement and no insurance,at￡71.70 a week,one of the least generous in the EU. According to Paragraph 3,being unemployed makes one feelA.uneasy B.enraged. C.insulted. D.guilty.” 相关考题
考题
The search engines work by means of _________.A． arranging links to the InternetB． submitting specific search termC． updating a knowledge databaseD． searching engine spiders
考题
According to the passage, which of the following is NOT true?A. One can know his friends better from their color preference.B. Workers can work better in a room with bright colors.C. The person who prefers dark colors can not be successful.D. We can change our mood by changing our clothes.
考题
Thousands of lives will be ________ if help does not arrive in the city soon.A at stakeB at easeC at randomD at hand
考题
During the voyage the ship encountered ______ winds and weather，during which time she labored heavily and to such extent that at times it was necessary to change courses and reduce speeds in order to ease her and prevent damage to herself and her cargo．A.largeB.bigC.boisterousD.high
考题
In order to reduce your wake in a narrow channel you should ______.A.apply enough rudder to counter the effect of the currentB.change your course to a zigzag courseC.reduce your speedD.shift the weight to the stern
考题
George was introduced to ____activities at a young age, when she was hire to act as a lookout for drugdealers.A.illegal
B.lawful
C.faithful
D.peaceful
考题
Text 1 In order to“change lives for the better”and reduce“dependency”George Osborne,Chancellor of the Exchequer,introduced the“upfront work search”scheme.Only if the jobless arrive at the jobcentre with a CV,register for online job search,and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly.What could be more reasonable?More apparent reasonableness followed.There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance.“Those first few days should be spent looking for work,not looking to sign on.”he claimed.“We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.”Help?Really?On first hearing,this was the socially concerned chancellor,trying to change lives for the better,complete with“reforms”to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work,and subsidises laziness.What motivated him,we were to understand,was his zeal for“fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer,controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.Losing a job is hurting:you don’t skip down to the jobcentre with a song in your heart,delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state.It is financially terrifying,psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.You are now not wanted;you support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.You are now not wanted;you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life.Worse,the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared.Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always:a job.But in Osborneland,your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood.It is as though 20 years of ever-tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened.The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens.Even the very phrase“jobseeker’s allowance”—invented in 1996—is about redefining the unemployed as a“jobseeker”who had no mandatory right to a benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions.Instead,the claimant receives a time-limited“allowance,”conditional on actively seeking a job;no entitlement and no insurance,at￡71.70 a week,one of the least generous in the EU.23.What prompted the chancellor to develop his scheme?A.A desire to secure a better life for all.
B.An eagerness to protect the unemployed.
C.An urge to be generous to the claimants.
D.A passion to ensure fairness for taxpayers.
考题
Text 1 In order to“change lives for the better”and reduce“dependency”George Osborne,Chancellor of the Exchequer,introduced the“upfront work search”scheme.Only if the jobless arrive at the jobcentre with a CV,register for online job search,and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly.What could be more reasonable?More apparent reasonableness followed.There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance.“Those first few days should be spent looking for work,not looking to sign on.”he claimed.“We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.”Help?Really?On first hearing,this was the socially concerned chancellor,trying to change lives for the better,complete with“reforms”to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work,and subsidises laziness.What motivated him,we were to understand,was his zeal for“fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer,controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.Losing a job is hurting:you don’t skip down to the jobcentre with a song in your heart,delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state.It is financially terrifying,psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.You are now not wanted;you support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.You are now not wanted;you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life.Worse,the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared.Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always:a job.But in Osborneland,your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood.It is as though 20 years of ever-tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened.The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens.Even the very phrase“jobseeker’s allowance”—invented in 1996—is about redefining the unemployed as a“jobseeker”who had no mandatory right to a benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions.Instead,the claimant receives a time-limited“allowance,”conditional on actively seeking a job;no entitlement and no insurance,at￡71.70 a week,one of the least generous in the EU.21.George Osborne’s scheme was intended toA.provide the unemployed with easier access to benefits.
B.encourage jobseekers’active engagement in job seeking.
C.motivate the unemployed to report voluntarily.
D.guarantee jobseekers’legitimate right to benefits.
考题
Text 1 In order to“change lives for the better”and reduce“dependency”George Osborne,Chancellor of the Exchequer,introduced the“upfront work search”scheme.Only if the jobless arrive at the jobcentre with a CV,register for online job search,and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly.What could be more reasonable?More apparent reasonableness followed.There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance.“Those first few days should be spent looking for work,not looking to sign on.”he claimed.“We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.”Help?Really?On first hearing,this was the socially concerned chancellor,trying to change lives for the better,complete with“reforms”to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work,and subsidises laziness.What motivated him,we were to understand,was his zeal for“fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer,controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.Losing a job is hurting:you don’t skip down to the jobcentre with a song in your heart,delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state.It is financially terrifying,psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.You are now not wanted;you support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.You are now not wanted;you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life.Worse,the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared.Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always:a job.But in Osborneland,your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood.It is as though 20 years of ever-tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened.The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens.Even the very phrase“jobseeker’s allowance”—invented in 1996—is about redefining the unemployed as a“jobseeker”who had no mandatory right to a benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions.Instead,the claimant receives a time-limited“allowance,”conditional on actively seeking a job;no entitlement and no insurance,at￡71.70 a week,one of the least generous in the EU.22.The phrase,“to sign on”（Line 3,Para.2）most probably meansA.to check on the availability of jobs at the jobcentre.
B.to accept the government’s restrictions on the allowance.
C.to register for an allowance from the government.
D.to attend a governmental job-training program
考题
In order to“change lives for the better”and reduce“dependency”George Osborne,Chancellor of the Exchequer,introduced the“upfront work search”scheme.Only if the jobless arrive at the jobcentre with a CV,register for online job search,and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly.What could be more reasonable?More apparent reasonableness followed.There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance.“Those first few days should be spent looking for work,not looking to sign on.”he claimed.“We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.”Help?Really?On first hearing,this was the socially concerned chancellor,trying to change lives for the better,complete with“reforms”to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work,and subsidises laziness.What motivated him,we were to understand,was his zeal for“fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer,controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.Losing a job is hurting:you don’t skip down to the jobcentre with a song in your heart,delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state.It is financially terrifying,psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.You are now not wanted;you support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get.You are now not wanted;you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life.Worse,the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared.Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always:a job.But in Osborneland,your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood.It is as though 20 years of ever-tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened.The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens.Even the very phrase“jobseeker’s allowance”—invented in 1996—is about redefining the unemployed as a“jobseeker”who had no mandatory right to a benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions.Instead,the claimant receives a time-limited“allowance,”conditional on actively seeking a job;no entitlement and no insurance,at￡71.70 a week,one of the least generous in the EU.
To which of the following would the author most probably agree?A.The British welfare system indulges jobseekers’laziness.
B.Osborne’s reforms will reduce the risk of unemployment.
C.The jobseekers’allowance has met their actual needs.
D.Unemployment benefits should not be made conditional.
考题
Change control within information technology（IT）systems is a formal process used to ensure that changes to product or system are introduced in a controlled and coordinated manner.It（74）the possibility that unnecessary changes will be introduced to a systeA.Adds
B.Removes
C.Produces
D.Reduces
考题
which three are current small business needs for technology investements?（）A、minimize network investmentsB、reduce reliance on technologyC、plan for todayD、be more productiveE、work from anywhereF、serve customers better
考题
How should a DNS client be configured？（）A、Edit the /etc/netsvc.conf file to have a nameserver and a domain search order.B、Edit the /etc/resolv.conf file to have a nameserver and a domain search order.C、Edit the /etc/resolv.conf file to have a nameserver， domain， and domain search order. D、Edit the /etc/netsvc.conf file to have a nameserver， domain， and domain search order.
考题
You create a salary report to display employee salaries grouped by the dept column. You need to change the break order from ascending to descending using the model. How would you reverse the display order of the department? （）A、Double click the dept column in the group to alter the property palette and change the break out order value. B、Double click the dept column in the group to open the property palette and change the set break order value. C、Double click the g_dept group object to change the break order. D、Click the dept column in the group to change the break order.
考题
A user has a 1TB external hard drive connected to a desktop system. When the user searches the drive for a file, the response to the search is very slow. How can the user improve the performance of the file searches on the external drive?（）A、Change the sort order of the files.B、Make sure that all of the files are in folders that are in alphabetical order.C、Search multiple drive letters at the same time.D、Turn on indexing for the assigned drive letter.
考题
A work order has been created to perform corrective maintenance on a defective generator. All required information has been provided in the work order， but required materials are not in stock and have to be ordered. What is the status of the work order， after a maintenance manager has approved the work order？ （）A、 Approved （APPR）B、 Waiting on Materials （WMATL）C、 Waiting to be Scheduled （WSCH）D、 Waiting on Plant Condition （WPCOND）
考题
Company.com has a four-node cluster （nodes ’A’， ’B’， ’C’， and ’D’）. The nodes are set up in Resource group pairs. Node ’A’ falls over to Node ’B’， and Node ’C’ falls over to Node ’C’. During a maintenance windows， it was discovered that the six resource groups on Node ’A’ are too much to be adequately handled by Node ’B’. What could be done to better utilize the available resources during fallover？（） A、 Implement Work Load manager so that the application monitors for additional resource requirements.B、 Add a fifth node to function as a load leveler in order to control the dispatching of the resource jobs.C、 Implement Dynamic Node Priorities in the resource groups in order to find a node with suitable system resources.D、 Reduce the number of resource groups on Node ’A’ to 1 in order to ensure faster and more robust fallover to a single system.
考题
What will happen to associated preventive maintenance (PM) records when an asset is decommissioned?（）A、There is no automatic method to change the PM(s) status to INACTIVEB、The PM(s) will become in INACTIVE if 'Change the Status of All Associated PM(s) to Inactive?' is checked while decommissioning the assetC、The only way to change the status of the PM(s) to INACTIVE is to remove the assets from the PM(s) and then change the status of the PM(s) to INACTIVED、If the 'Change the Status of All Associated PM(s) to Inactive?' is not selected during decommissioning, the PM(s) status will remain ACTIVE; however, work order cannot be generated from the PM having a decommissioned asset
考题
单选题A work order has been created to perform corrective maintenance on a defective generator. All required information has been provided in the work order， but required materials are not in stock and have to be ordered. What is the status of the work order， after a maintenance manager has approved the work order？ （）A
Approved （APPR）B
Waiting on Materials （WMATL）C
Waiting to be Scheduled （WSCH）D
Waiting on Plant Condition （WPCOND）
考题
单选题Which of the following is true about the leaders’ position?A
Obama holds that markets need morals.B
Shadow chancellor George Osborne opposes the summit being held in London.C
Brown insists the main goal of the summit is to deliver unity in face of crisis.D
French President demands for a worldwide financial regulator.
考题
单选题What will happen to associated preventive maintenance (PM) records when an asset is decommissioned?（）A
There is no automatic method to change the PM(s) status to INACTIVEB
The PM(s) will become in INACTIVE if 'Change the Status of All Associated PM(s) to Inactive?' is checked while decommissioning the assetC
The only way to change the status of the PM(s) to INACTIVE is to remove the assets from the PM(s) and then change the status of the PM(s) to INACTIVED
If the 'Change the Status of All Associated PM(s) to Inactive?' is not selected during decommissioning, the PM(s) status will remain ACTIVE; however, work order cannot be generated from the PM having a decommissioned asset
考题
单选题How should a DNS client be configured？（）A
Edit the /etc/netsvc.conf file to have a nameserver and a domain search order.B
Edit the /etc/resolv.conf file to have a nameserver and a domain search order.C
Edit the /etc/resolv.conf file to have a nameserver， domain， and domain search order. D
Edit the /etc/netsvc.conf file to have a nameserver， domain， and domain search order.
考题
单选题Shadow chancellor George Osborne holds that ______.A
London is not capable of hosting the summitB
Lord Myners should not have signed off Sir Fred Goodwin’s pensionC
there was no “common ground” on the G20D
the UK government’s entire economic strategy has fallen apart
考题
单选题You create a salary report to display employee salaries grouped by the dept column. You need to change the break order from ascending to descending using the model. How would you reverse the display order of the department? （）A
Double click the dept column in the group to alter the property palette and change the break out order value. B
Double click the dept column in the group to open the property palette and change the set break order value. C
Double click the g_dept group object to change the break order. D
Click the dept column in the group to change the break order.
热门标签
最新试卷
