网友您好， 请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目：
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
It′ s said that the power plant is now __________large as what is was.
A.twice as
B.as twice
C.twice much
D.much twice
B.as twice
C.twice much
D.much twice
参考答案
参考解析
解析：考查倍数表达。倍数表达的基本结构一般为“A+倍数+as+形容词／副词+as+B”，表示。A正好是B的多少倍”。句意为“据说，这个发电厂是它过去的两倍大”。故选A。
更多 “It′ s said that the power plant is now __________large as what is was.A.twice as B.as twice C.twice much D.much twice ” 相关考题
考题
He was so _________ from things around him that I wondered whether he did listen to what I said just now.
A.separatedB.detachedC.dispatchedD.touched
考题
Clerk: Please fill out the form.Guest: All right. , please?Clerk: It's August, the thirteenth.A． What day is it todayB． What's the numberC． What's the date todayD． What's the time now
考题
"________everyone’s here, ” she said, “let’s begin to discuss it. ”A.As far asB.Now thatC.So farD.By far
考题
Sir, I've not understand what you have said just now.Ok,________
A.thank it easyB.I wonder whyC.let me explain that in more details.
考题
On Thursday August 14th, a massive power failure switched off lights and shut down factories across a large area of the north-eastern United States and southern Canada. The outcome affected some of the world's biggest and busiest cities, including New York, Detroit, Cleveland and Toronto, leaving up to 60m people without electricity, equivalent to the entire population of France or Britain.So severe was the disruption (破坏) in New York State that its governor, George Pataki, declared a state of emergency. Confused workers spilled on to the streets, while thousands more were trapped for hours in lifts and hot, crowded subway trains. Lots of stranded (进退两难的) people ended up spending Thursday night on New York's streets. Thieves in Brooklyn in New York, and in Canada's capital, Ottawa, took advantage of the absence of streetlights and burglar alarms, and went on a looting spree (疯狂抢掠). Officials were taken aback by the speed at which the chaos unfolded. President George Bush described the incident as a "massive national problem" and promised a full investigation into what caused it.That is still a matter of some debate. At first, naturally, there were fears of terrorist involvement, but this was quickly ruled out. However, officials were left arguing about what had actually happened. The office of Canada's prime minister, Jean Chretien, said that a severe accident at a nuclear-power plant in Pennsylvania may have been the cause. Earlier, American and Canadian officials had said a fire or perhaps lightning had hit a power plant near Niagara Falls in New York State.1、Several cities were affected by the massive power failure on August 14th except____.A、OttawaB、ClevelandC、ChicagoD、Brooklyn2、The word "outage" in Paragraph 1 can be best replaced by____.A、power shortcutB、 disruptionC、 massive national problemD、 power failure3、Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?____A、Many streetlights and burglar alarms were stolen during the blackout.B、Some terrorists were involved in the incident.C、President George Bush demanded a full investigation into the disruption in New York.D、Officials were not sure what had caused the power failure.4、It can be inferred from the passage that____.A、France has a population of about 60 million.B、Only some large cities were affected by the power failure.C、 Canada's prime minister knew what had caused the power failure.D、Water was spilt onto the streets by confused workers.5、The power failure on August 14th brought about big chaos except that____.A、thousands of people were trapped in liftsB、 many people had to stay on streets for Thursday night.C、 stores were robbed by the thieves.D、a power plant near Niagara Falls was hit by a fire or lightning.
考题
Text 2 A deal is a deal-except,apparently,when Entergy is involved.The company,a major energy supplier in New England,provoked justified outrage in Vermont last week when it announced it was reneging on a longstanding commitment to abide by the strict nuclear regulations.Instead,the company has done precisely what it had long promised it would not challenge the constitutionality of Vermont’s rules in the federal court,as part of a desperate effort to keep its Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant running.It’s a stunning move.The conflict has been surfacing since 2002,when the corporation bought Vermont’s only nuclear power plant,an aging reactor in Vernon.As a condition of receiving state approval for the sale,the company agreed to seek permission from state regulators to operate past 2012.In 2006,the state went a step further,requiring that any extension of the plant’s license be subject to Vermont legislature’s approval.Then,too,the company went along.Either Entergy never really intended to live by those commitments,or it simply didn’t foresee what would happen next.A string of accidents,including the partial collapse of a cooling tower in 207 and the discovery of an underground pipe system leakage,raised serious questions about both Vermont Yankee’s safety and Entergy’s management–especially after the company made misleading statements about the pipe.Enraged by Entergy’s behavior,the Vermont Senate voted 26 to 4 last year against allowing an extension.Now the company is suddenly claiming that the 2002 agreement is invalid because of the 2006 legislation,and that only the federal government has regulatory power over nuclear issues.The legal issues in the case are obscure:whereas the Supreme Court has ruled that states do have some regulatory authority over nuclear power,legal scholars say that Vermont case will offer a precedent-setting test of how far those powers extend.Certainly,there are valid concerns about the patchwork regulations that could result if every state sets its own rules.But had Entergy kept its word,that debate would be beside the point.The company seems to have concluded that its reputation in Vermont is already so damaged that it has noting left to lose by going to war with the state.But there should be consequences.Permission to run a nuclear plant is a poblic trust.Entergy runs 11 other reactors in the United States,including Pilgrim Nuclear station in Plymouth.Pledging to run Pilgrim safely,the company has applied for federal permission to keep it open for another 20 years.But as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission（NRC）reviews the company’s application,it should keep it mind what promises from Entergy are worth.30.It can be inferred from the last paragraph thatA.Entergy’s business elsewhere might be affected.
B.the authority of the NRC will be defied.
C.Entergy will withdraw its Plymouth application.
D.Vermont’s reputation might be damaged.
考题
Text 2 A deal is a deal-except,apparently,when Entergy is involved.The company,a major energy supplier in New England,provoked justified outrage in Vermont last week when it announced it was reneging on a longstanding commitment to abide by the strict nuclear regulations.Instead,the company has done precisely what it had long promised it would not challenge the constitutionality of Vermont’s rules in the federal court,as part of a desperate effort to keep its Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant running.It’s a stunning move.The conflict has been surfacing since 2002,when the corporation bought Vermont’s only nuclear power plant,an aging reactor in Vernon.As a condition of receiving state approval for the sale,the company agreed to seek permission from state regulators to operate past 2012.In 2006,the state went a step further,requiring that any extension of the plant’s license be subject to Vermont legislature’s approval.Then,too,the company went along.Either Entergy never really intended to live by those commitments,or it simply didn’t foresee what would happen next.A string of accidents,including the partial collapse of a cooling tower in 207 and the discovery of an underground pipe system leakage,raised serious questions about both Vermont Yankee’s safety and Entergy’s management–especially after the company made misleading statements about the pipe.Enraged by Entergy’s behavior,the Vermont Senate voted 26 to 4 last year against allowing an extension.Now the company is suddenly claiming that the 2002 agreement is invalid because of the 2006 legislation,and that only the federal government has regulatory power over nuclear issues.The legal issues in the case are obscure:whereas the Supreme Court has ruled that states do have some regulatory authority over nuclear power,legal scholars say that Vermont case will offer a precedent-setting test of how far those powers extend.Certainly,there are valid concerns about the patchwork regulations that could result if every state sets its own rules.But had Entergy kept its word,that debate would be beside the point.The company seems to have concluded that its reputation in Vermont is already so damaged that it has noting left to lose by going to war with the state.But there should be consequences.Permission to run a nuclear plant is a poblic trust.Entergy runs 11 other reactors in the United States,including Pilgrim Nuclear station in Plymouth.Pledging to run Pilgrim safely,the company has applied for federal permission to keep it open for another 20 years.But as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission（NRC）reviews the company’s application,it should keep it mind what promises from Entergy are worth.27.By entering into the 2002 agreement,Entergy intended toA.obtain protection from Vermont regulators.
B.seek favor from the federal legislature.
C.acquire an extension of its business license.
D.get permission to purchase a power plant.
考题
Text 2 A deal is a deal-except,apparently,when Entergy is involved.The company,a major energy supplier in New England,provoked justified outrage in Vermont last week when it announced it was reneging on a longstanding commitment to abide by the strict nuclear regulations.Instead,the company has done precisely what it had long promised it would not challenge the constitutionality of Vermont’s rules in the federal court,as part of a desperate effort to keep its Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant running.It’s a stunning move.The conflict has been surfacing since 2002,when the corporation bought Vermont’s only nuclear power plant,an aging reactor in Vernon.As a condition of receiving state approval for the sale,the company agreed to seek permission from state regulators to operate past 2012.In 2006,the state went a step further,requiring that any extension of the plant’s license be subject to Vermont legislature’s approval.Then,too,the company went along.Either Entergy never really intended to live by those commitments,or it simply didn’t foresee what would happen next.A string of accidents,including the partial collapse of a cooling tower in 207 and the discovery of an underground pipe system leakage,raised serious questions about both Vermont Yankee’s safety and Entergy’s management–especially after the company made misleading statements about the pipe.Enraged by Entergy’s behavior,the Vermont Senate voted 26 to 4 last year against allowing an extension.Now the company is suddenly claiming that the 2002 agreement is invalid because of the 2006 legislation,and that only the federal government has regulatory power over nuclear issues.The legal issues in the case are obscure:whereas the Supreme Court has ruled that states do have some regulatory authority over nuclear power,legal scholars say that Vermont case will offer a precedent-setting test of how far those powers extend.Certainly,there are valid concerns about the patchwork regulations that could result if every state sets its own rules.But had Entergy kept its word,that debate would be beside the point.The company seems to have concluded that its reputation in Vermont is already so damaged that it has noting left to lose by going to war with the state.But there should be consequences.Permission to run a nuclear plant is a poblic trust.Entergy runs 11 other reactors in the United States,including Pilgrim Nuclear station in Plymouth.Pledging to run Pilgrim safely,the company has applied for federal permission to keep it open for another 20 years.But as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission（NRC）reviews the company’s application,it should keep it mind what promises from Entergy are worth.29.In the author’s view,the Vermont case will testA.Entergy’s capacity to fulfill all its promises.
B.the mature of states’patchwork regulations.
C.the federal authority over nuclear issues.
D.the limits of states’power over nuclear issues.
考题
Text 2 A deal is a deal-except,apparently,when Entergy is involved.The company,a major energy supplier in New England,provoked justified outrage in Vermont last week when it announced it was reneging on a longstanding commitment to abide by the strict nuclear regulations.Instead,the company has done precisely what it had long promised it would not challenge the constitutionality of Vermont’s rules in the federal court,as part of a desperate effort to keep its Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant running.It’s a stunning move.The conflict has been surfacing since 2002,when the corporation bought Vermont’s only nuclear power plant,an aging reactor in Vernon.As a condition of receiving state approval for the sale,the company agreed to seek permission from state regulators to operate past 2012.In 2006,the state went a step further,requiring that any extension of the plant’s license be subject to Vermont legislature’s approval.Then,too,the company went along.Either Entergy never really intended to live by those commitments,or it simply didn’t foresee what would happen next.A string of accidents,including the partial collapse of a cooling tower in 207 and the discovery of an underground pipe system leakage,raised serious questions about both Vermont Yankee’s safety and Entergy’s management–especially after the company made misleading statements about the pipe.Enraged by Entergy’s behavior,the Vermont Senate voted 26 to 4 last year against allowing an extension.Now the company is suddenly claiming that the 2002 agreement is invalid because of the 2006 legislation,and that only the federal government has regulatory power over nuclear issues.The legal issues in the case are obscure:whereas the Supreme Court has ruled that states do have some regulatory authority over nuclear power,legal scholars say that Vermont case will offer a precedent-setting test of how far those powers extend.Certainly,there are valid concerns about the patchwork regulations that could result if every state sets its own rules.But had Entergy kept its word,that debate would be beside the point.The company seems to have concluded that its reputation in Vermont is already so damaged that it has noting left to lose by going to war with the state.But there should be consequences.Permission to run a nuclear plant is a poblic trust.Entergy runs 11 other reactors in the United States,including Pilgrim Nuclear station in Plymouth.Pledging to run Pilgrim safely,the company has applied for federal permission to keep it open for another 20 years.But as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission（NRC）reviews the company’s application,it should keep it mind what promises from Entergy are worth.26.The phrase“reneging on”（Line 3.para.1）is closest in meaning toA.condemning.
B.reaffirming.
C.dishonoring.
D.securing.
考题
When Richard said, "You are much more agreeable and prettier now", Joan′ s face turned red at the unexpected _____________.A.contribution
B.compliment
C.comparison
D.command
考题
The systems administrator of a large manufacturer has POWER5 and POWER6 servers， each with LPARs running AIX 6.1. They are running several workloads including SAP， DNS， Oracle， DB2 and WebSphere Application Server， and plan to consolidate onto one POWER7 server. How can the system administrator determine how much benefit Active Memory Expansion （AME） could provide for the consolidated system？（）A、Run amepat now on all of the existing LPARs.B、Run amepat after consolidation on all LPARs.C、Run amepat now on all existing LPARs running on the POWER6 servers.D、Run amepat now on all existing LPARs running database applications.
考题
Small， medium， and large businesses today are increasingly using "Green" products within their IT Environments. What are the most significant factors propelling this change？（）A、Government regulation and environmental effectsB、Cost of power consumption and environment effectsC、Government regulation and cost of power consumptionD、Environmental effects and low cost of product
考题
A customer's plant maintenance manager invites a solution advisor to discuss Enterprise Asset Management in general and how it might help the maintenance group work more effectively and efficiently. What should the solution advisor do in the first meeting with the plant maintenance manager?（）A、Ask the plant maintenance manager about the company's history, competition, and market value.B、Ask the plant maintenance manager about their background, education, and professional experience.C、Ask the plant maintenance manager about current systems in use, issues with the system,and key areas where the manager wants to see improvements. D、Ask the plant maintenance manager about the number of employees, union representation, and how IBM Maximo Asset Management can represent employees and their skill sets.
考题
单选题—What’s your father doing now?—He ______ the room.A
cleanedB
cleansC
has cleanedD
is cleaning
考题
填空题What kind of storage the user’s account now has?It now has 5,000 megabytes of ____ storage.
考题
单选题John: Hello! This is John speaking. Susan: Good evening, John. This is Susan. John: How nice to hear you! Are you ready yet, Susan? Susan: Yes, I am. By the way, ______ John: Just now the weather report said it’s going to rain.A
can you tell me the weather tomorrow?B
what should the weather be like tomorrow?C
do you know what the weather will be like tomorrow?D
how’s the weather like tomorrow?
考题
单选题Before writing a book, the first thing is considering what to say.A
you must first ponder what to say and what not to be said carefullyB
it’s extremely necessary that you know what to sayC
the first thing is to consider what to sayD
you must first ponder what to say and what not to say
考题
问答题Practice 1 Genetic researchers have accelerated a plant’s growth by making its cells split faster—a technique that could someday lead to healthier crops, shorter growing seasons and less use of herbicides. One outside scientist called the findings astonishing. But the technique needs more testing on a range of plants, and public fear of genetically modified food is jeopardizing support for such experiments, especially in Europe, researchers said. The experiment, reported Thursday in the journal Nature, was carried out by a team at Cambridge University. The researchers first took a gene promoting cell division from inside the Arabidopsis plant, a flowering weed often used for genetic experiments. They transplanted that gene into a tobacco plant. There, in an especially potent form, the gene produced large amounts of a protein that, in combination with other chemicals naturally in the tobacco, made the plant’s cells divide more quickly at the tips of roots and shoots. Within a month after planting, the altered tobacco grew as much as twice as tall as other tobacco plants. Ultimately, the other plants caught up, and both groups then appeared identical in all ways. “It’s sort of like they’ve been able to make the plant go full throttle,” a said plant growth biologist John Schiefelbein at the University of Michigan. The leader of the study, Claire Cockcroft, said it is conceivable that the technique could be transferred to other species. Such plants, which probably would take years to develop commercially, might allow an extra planting in some climates or the introduction of crops in places where the growing season is too short, researchers said. The quick-growth plants would presumably take hold more easily, requiring less chemical herbicide to knock out weeds. Such plants might make easier and cheaper sources of some drugs. In scientific circles, the British research may also help settle an intense debate over what makes plants grow. Some argue, like these researchers, that something at the cellular level switches on growth; others look to hormones or other chemicals at a higher level of the plant’s makeup. “This is astonishing. Normally you would expect growth regulation to be more complicated,” said plant researcher Xuemin Wang at Kansas State University. “This has huge implications in terms of how we look at plant growth.” Biotechnology companies have genetically manipulated fruits and vegetables to make them more attractive or resistant to insects and disease. Genetic work has shown some early promise for faster growth, too. But previous attempts to boost growth through faster cell division have produced more cells—but smaller ones—and no overall growth. Scientists said such work is safe, with little chance of accidentally turning an unwanted plant into a fast-growing weed. After all, crops have been selectively bred for decades to bring out certain traits. However, ethicist Jeffrey Burkhardt at the University of Florida’s Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences said selective breeding takes perhaps 15 years, giving scientists ample time to see the implications. “With the new biotechnology, you’re potentially moving traits in and out within a year,” he said.
考题
单选题In the author’s opinion, what is the relationship between Andry Rajoelina and the military?A
All of the military are supporting Andry Rajoelina.B
Andry Rajoelina is head of the military.C
Part of the military is said to oppose Andry Rajoelina.D
The military support Andry Rajoelina but require more power.
考题
单选题What Albe said in the last paragraph implies that _____.A
there is more and more waste to be recycledB
it is difficult for TerraCycle to recycle everythingC
TerraCycle is trying to meet the challenge of new wasteD
TerraCycle has successfully recycled a large amount of waste
考题
单选题What does the passage mainly discuss?A
The acquisition of British Nuclear Fuels by Toshiba.B
The acquisition of Westinghouse Electric by Toshiba.C
Toshiba’s expansion in nuclear power business.D
Toshiba’s embarking on nuclear power business.
考题
单选题It’s said that the power plant is now ______ large as what it was.A
twice asB
as twiceC
twice muchD
much twice
热门标签
最新试卷
