网友您好， 请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目：
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
单选题
From the passage, it can be seen that the author _____.
A
believes the reform has reduced the government’s burden
B
insists that welfare reform is doing little good for the poor
C
is overenthusiastic about the success of welfare reform
D
considers welfare reform to be fundamentally successful
参考答案
参考解析
解析：
主旨题。从全文来看，作者对福利政策改革进行两方面的分析，既指出了成就也指出其不足。但总体来看，作者对福利政策改革持赞扬态度。作者两次提到改革的成功，第一次是在文章开头，指出在各州取得了巨大成功；第二次是在文章倒数第三段，对很多穷人来说现在无政府资助，同过去有政府资助一样好，这本身就是一个巨大胜利。这与D项“福利改革取得了基本的成功”相符。
主旨题。从全文来看，作者对福利政策改革进行两方面的分析，既指出了成就也指出其不足。但总体来看，作者对福利政策改革持赞扬态度。作者两次提到改革的成功，第一次是在文章开头，指出在各州取得了巨大成功；第二次是在文章倒数第三段，对很多穷人来说现在无政府资助，同过去有政府资助一样好，这本身就是一个巨大胜利。这与D项“福利改革取得了基本的成功”相符。
更多 “单选题From the passage, it can be seen that the author _____.A believes the reform has reduced the government’s burdenB insists that welfare reform is doing little good for the poorC is overenthusiastic about the success of welfare reformD considers welfare reform to be fundamentally successful” 相关考题
考题
The purpose of the author in writing this passage isA． that, by banning the violent sports, we human beings can improve ourselvesB． that, by banning the dangerous sports, we can improve the lawC． that we must take positive steps to improve social welfare systemD． to show law is the main instrument of social change
考题
The chief reason why philanthropy has conic into a good stage is thatA． the new money is less likely to be regarded as one's private wealthB． Gates will devote his full attention to philanthropyC． the welfare state would take over all the charity responsibilitiesD． many new millionaires are self-made rather than inherited
考题
From the passage, we can inter thatA． the author has a high opinion of the foundationB． the author is surely a close friend of the GatesC． the author believes Bill Gates is really a kind personD． the author admires the medical knowledge of Bill Gates
考题
We can learn from the fourth paragraph that[A] a substantial cut in annual revenue is called for.[ B] defense and social welfare programs should undergo cuts.[ C] we should leave intact programs for bettering people's living.[D] we should exercise less control over monetary policy.
考题
The newly－elected Prime Minister said that the new government would__the welfare of the people.
A.prey onB.take onC.get atD.see to
考题
Haier’s success resulted from a partial reform. of its once－traditional management model.()
此题为判断题(对，错)。
考题
"Welfare makes people lazy"is an intellectual pillar of conservative economic theory,which recommends cutting programs like Medicaid and cash assistance,partly out of a fear that self-reliance degenerates in the face of government assistance.Many economists have for decades argued that this orthodoxy is simply wrong.Welfare isn't just a moral imperative to raise the Iiving standards of the poor.lt's also a critical investment in the health and future careers of low-income kids.However,a core mission of the Republican Party is to reduce government aid to the poor.Many conservative economists argue that some adults might reject certain jobs or longer work hours because doing so would eliminate their eligibility for programs like Medicaid.But this concern has little basis in reality.One of the latest studies on the subject found that Medicaid has"little if any"impact on employment or work hours.In research based in Canada and the U.S.,the economist Ioana Marinescu has found that even when basic-income programs do reduce working hours,adults don't typically stay home to,say,play video games;instead,they often use the extra cash to go back to school or hold out for a more desirable job.But the standard conservative critique of Medicaid and other welfare programs is wrong on another plane entirely.It fails to account for the conclusion of a 2015 paper:Anti-poverty programs can work wonders for their youngest recipients.According to the paper,American adults whose families had access to prenatal coverage under Medicaid have lower rates of obesity,higher rates of high-school graduation,and higher incomes as adults than those from similar households in states without Medicaid."Welfare helps people work"may sound like a strange and counterintuitive claim to some.But it is perfectly obvious when the word people in that sentence refers to low-income children in poor households.Poverty and lack of access to health care is a physical,psychological,and vocational burden for children.Poverty is a slow-motion trauma,and impoverished children are more likely than their middle-class peers to suffer from chronic physiological stress and exhibit antisocial behavior.It's self-evident that relieving children of an ambient trauma improves their lives and,indeed,relieved of these burdens,children from poorer households are more likely to follow the path from high-school graduation to college and then full-time employment,Republicans have a complicated relationship with the American Dream.Conservative politicians praise the virtues of hard work and opportunity.But when they use these virtues to strongly criticize welfare programs,they ignore the overwhelming evidence that government aid relieves low-income children of the psychological and physiological stresses that get in the way of embracing those very ideals.Welfare is so much more than a substitute for a paycheck.It is a remedy for the myriad burdens of childhood poverty,which gives children the opportunity to become exactly the sort of healthy and striving adults celebrated by both political parties.
It is suggested in Paragraphs 4 and 5 that impoverished childrenA.can hardly avoid exhibiting antisocial behavior.
B.are more likely to work wonders than their peers.
C.are doomed to fail in their study and future career.
D.definitely need social welfare to grow and develop.
考题
"Welfare makes people lazy"is an intellectual pillar of conservative economic theory,which recommends cutting programs like Medicaid and cash assistance,partly out of a fear that self-reliance degenerates in the face of government assistance.Many economists have for decades argued that this orthodoxy is simply wrong.Welfare isn't just a moral imperative to raise the Iiving standards of the poor.lt's also a critical investment in the health and future careers of low-income kids.However,a core mission of the Republican Party is to reduce government aid to the poor.Many conservative economists argue that some adults might reject certain jobs or longer work hours because doing so would eliminate their eligibility for programs like Medicaid.But this concern has little basis in reality.One of the latest studies on the subject found that Medicaid has"little if any"impact on employment or work hours.In research based in Canada and the U.S.,the economist Ioana Marinescu has found that even when basic-income programs do reduce working hours,adults don't typically stay home to,say,play video games;instead,they often use the extra cash to go back to school or hold out for a more desirable job.But the standard conservative critique of Medicaid and other welfare programs is wrong on another plane entirely.It fails to account for the conclusion of a 2015 paper:Anti-poverty programs can work wonders for their youngest recipients.According to the paper,American adults whose families had access to prenatal coverage under Medicaid have lower rates of obesity,higher rates of high-school graduation,and higher incomes as adults than those from similar households in states without Medicaid."Welfare helps people work"may sound like a strange and counterintuitive claim to some.But it is perfectly obvious when the word people in that sentence refers to low-income children in poor households.Poverty and lack of access to health care is a physical,psychological,and vocational burden for children.Poverty is a slow-motion trauma,and impoverished children are more likely than their middle-class peers to suffer from chronic physiological stress and exhibit antisocial behavior.It's self-evident that relieving children of an ambient trauma improves their lives and,indeed,relieved of these burdens,children from poorer households are more likely to follow the path from high-school graduation to college and then full-time employment,Republicans have a complicated relationship with the American Dream.Conservative politicians praise the virtues of hard work and opportunity.But when they use these virtues to strongly criticize welfare programs,they ignore the overwhelming evidence that government aid relieves low-income children of the psychological and physiological stresses that get in the way of embracing those very ideals.Welfare is so much more than a substitute for a paycheck.It is a remedy for the myriad burdens of childhood poverty,which gives children the opportunity to become exactly the sort of healthy and striving adults celebrated by both political parties.
The author holds that RepublicansA.value equal opportunity for welfare.
B.fail to understand the virtues of hard work and opportunity.
C.are self-conflicting in the defense of the American Dream.
D.are likely to cooperate with Democrats on welfare reform.
考题
"Welfare makes people lazy"is an intellectual pillar of conservative economic theory,which recommends cutting programs like Medicaid and cash assistance,partly out of a fear that self-reliance degenerates in the face of government assistance.Many economists have for decades argued that this orthodoxy is simply wrong.Welfare isn't just a moral imperative to raise the Iiving standards of the poor.lt's also a critical investment in the health and future careers of low-income kids.However,a core mission of the Republican Party is to reduce government aid to the poor.Many conservative economists argue that some adults might reject certain jobs or longer work hours because doing so would eliminate their eligibility for programs like Medicaid.But this concern has little basis in reality.One of the latest studies on the subject found that Medicaid has"little if any"impact on employment or work hours.In research based in Canada and the U.S.,the economist Ioana Marinescu has found that even when basic-income programs do reduce working hours,adults don't typically stay home to,say,play video games;instead,they often use the extra cash to go back to school or hold out for a more desirable job.But the standard conservative critique of Medicaid and other welfare programs is wrong on another plane entirely.It fails to account for the conclusion of a 2015 paper:Anti-poverty programs can work wonders for their youngest recipients.According to the paper,American adults whose families had access to prenatal coverage under Medicaid have lower rates of obesity,higher rates of high-school graduation,and higher incomes as adults than those from similar households in states without Medicaid."Welfare helps people work"may sound like a strange and counterintuitive claim to some.But it is perfectly obvious when the word people in that sentence refers to low-income children in poor households.Poverty and lack of access to health care is a physical,psychological,and vocational burden for children.Poverty is a slow-motion trauma,and impoverished children are more likely than their middle-class peers to suffer from chronic physiological stress and exhibit antisocial behavior.It's self-evident that relieving children of an ambient trauma improves their lives and,indeed,relieved of these burdens,children from poorer households are more likely to follow the path from high-school graduation to college and then full-time employment,Republicans have a complicated relationship with the American Dream.Conservative politicians praise the virtues of hard work and opportunity.But when they use these virtues to strongly criticize welfare programs,they ignore the overwhelming evidence that government aid relieves low-income children of the psychological and physiological stresses that get in the way of embracing those very ideals.Welfare is so much more than a substitute for a paycheck.It is a remedy for the myriad burdens of childhood poverty,which gives children the opportunity to become exactly the sort of healthy and striving adults celebrated by both political parties.
Conservative economists hold that welfareA.should exclude the form of cash assistance.
B.may merely be good for low-income kids.
C.would undermine work incentives.
D.should loosen its eligibility criteria.
考题
"Welfare makes people lazy"is an intellectual pillar of conservative economic theory,which recommends cutting programs like Medicaid and cash assistance,partly out of a fear that self-reliance degenerates in the face of government assistance.Many economists have for decades argued that this orthodoxy is simply wrong.Welfare isn't just a moral imperative to raise the Iiving standards of the poor.lt's also a critical investment in the health and future careers of low-income kids.However,a core mission of the Republican Party is to reduce government aid to the poor.Many conservative economists argue that some adults might reject certain jobs or longer work hours because doing so would eliminate their eligibility for programs like Medicaid.But this concern has little basis in reality.One of the latest studies on the subject found that Medicaid has"little if any"impact on employment or work hours.In research based in Canada and the U.S.,the economist Ioana Marinescu has found that even when basic-income programs do reduce working hours,adults don't typically stay home to,say,play video games;instead,they often use the extra cash to go back to school or hold out for a more desirable job.But the standard conservative critique of Medicaid and other welfare programs is wrong on another plane entirely.It fails to account for the conclusion of a 2015 paper:Anti-poverty programs can work wonders for their youngest recipients.According to the paper,American adults whose families had access to prenatal coverage under Medicaid have lower rates of obesity,higher rates of high-school graduation,and higher incomes as adults than those from similar households in states without Medicaid."Welfare helps people work"may sound like a strange and counterintuitive claim to some.But it is perfectly obvious when the word people in that sentence refers to low-income children in poor households.Poverty and lack of access to health care is a physical,psychological,and vocational burden for children.Poverty is a slow-motion trauma,and impoverished children are more likely than their middle-class peers to suffer from chronic physiological stress and exhibit antisocial behavior.It's self-evident that relieving children of an ambient trauma improves their lives and,indeed,relieved of these burdens,children from poorer households are more likely to follow the path from high-school graduation to college and then full-time employment,Republicans have a complicated relationship with the American Dream.Conservative politicians praise the virtues of hard work and opportunity.But when they use these virtues to strongly criticize welfare programs,they ignore the overwhelming evidence that government aid relieves low-income children of the psychological and physiological stresses that get in the way of embracing those very ideals.Welfare is so much more than a substitute for a paycheck.It is a remedy for the myriad burdens of childhood poverty,which gives children the opportunity to become exactly the sort of healthy and striving adults celebrated by both political parties.
Which of the following would be the best title for the text?A.Shattering the Myth of"Welfare Makes People Lazy"
B.Challenging the Dominance of Conservative Economccs
C.Promoting Child Development Through Medicaid
D.Defending the Equal Access to the American Dream
考题
"Welfare makes people lazy"is an intellectual pillar of conservative economic theory,which recommends cutting programs like Medicaid and cash assistance,partly out of a fear that self-reliance degenerates in the face of government assistance.Many economists have for decades argued that this orthodoxy is simply wrong.Welfare isn't just a moral imperative to raise the Iiving standards of the poor.lt's also a critical investment in the health and future careers of low-income kids.However,a core mission of the Republican Party is to reduce government aid to the poor.Many conservative economists argue that some adults might reject certain jobs or longer work hours because doing so would eliminate their eligibility for programs like Medicaid.But this concern has little basis in reality.One of the latest studies on the subject found that Medicaid has"little if any"impact on employment or work hours.In research based in Canada and the U.S.,the economist Ioana Marinescu has found that even when basic-income programs do reduce working hours,adults don't typically stay home to,say,play video games;instead,they often use the extra cash to go back to school or hold out for a more desirable job.But the standard conservative critique of Medicaid and other welfare programs is wrong on another plane entirely.It fails to account for the conclusion of a 2015 paper:Anti-poverty programs can work wonders for their youngest recipients.According to the paper,American adults whose families had access to prenatal coverage under Medicaid have lower rates of obesity,higher rates of high-school graduation,and higher incomes as adults than those from similar households in states without Medicaid."Welfare helps people work"may sound like a strange and counterintuitive claim to some.But it is perfectly obvious when the word people in that sentence refers to low-income children in poor households.Poverty and lack of access to health care is a physical,psychological,and vocational burden for children.Poverty is a slow-motion trauma,and impoverished children are more likely than their middle-class peers to suffer from chronic physiological stress and exhibit antisocial behavior.It's self-evident that relieving children of an ambient trauma improves their lives and,indeed,relieved of these burdens,children from poorer households are more likely to follow the path from high-school graduation to college and then full-time employment,Republicans have a complicated relationship with the American Dream.Conservative politicians praise the virtues of hard work and opportunity.But when they use these virtues to strongly criticize welfare programs,they ignore the overwhelming evidence that government aid relieves low-income children of the psychological and physiological stresses that get in the way of embracing those very ideals.Welfare is so much more than a substitute for a paycheck.It is a remedy for the myriad burdens of childhood poverty,which gives children the opportunity to become exactly the sort of healthy and striving adults celebrated by both political parties.
According to loana Marinescu.basic-income programsA.justify concerns over aid dependency.
B.will not reduce working hours.
C.help raise the employment rate.
D.allow people to make progress.
考题
Which of the following statements is true?__________A.The author believes that a born naturalist can not be a scientist
B.The author read a lot of books about the natural world and oil industry
C.The author's brothers and sisters were good at music and languages
D.The author spend a lot of time working on riddles
考题
单选题According to the passage before the welfare reform was carried out, _____.A
the poverty rate was lowerB
average living standards were higherC
the average worker was paid higher wagesD
the poor used to rely on government aid
考题
单选题From the passage, it can be seen that the author _____.A
believes the reform has reduced the government’s burdenB
insists that welfare reform is doing little good for the poorC
is overenthusiastic about the success of welfare reformD
considers welfare reform to be fundamentally successful
考题
填空题When there was a direct impact that can be seen on the consumer, the importance of animal welfare could be raised.____
考题
单选题China’s economic reform is aimed at separating enterprises from the government. It has been implemented for almost 20 years, but breakthroughs ______ .A
have been made yetB
have yet to makeC
have yet to be madeD
to have yet made
考题
单选题From the passage we know that welfare reform aims at _____.A
saving welfare fundsB
rebuilding the work ethicC
providing more jobsD
cutting government expenses
考题
单选题The author cites the example of the welfare state to prove that _____.A
it is the interventionism that resulted into the welfare economyB
interventionism is a kind of new protectionismC
government intervention into the private economy affects international tradeD
government intervention into some field can give better results
考题
单选题Which of the following best expresses the main idea of the passage?A
The extra increase in benefit rates for families with young children is more important than other issues.B
To reduce poverty, the most important thing is to lower unemployment.C
To narrow the gap between rich and poor, the benefit rates should be raised higher than inflation rate.D
The government’s welfare reform programme has met strong criticism and opposition.
考题
单选题This passage is primarily concerned with discussing _____.A
the definition of the new protectionismB
the difference between new and old protectionismC
the emergence of the new protectionism in the Western worldD
the significance of the welfare state
考题
单选题Which of the following statements is NOT a characteristic of a welfare state mentioned in this passage?A
Free education is available to a child.B
Laws are made to fix the minimum wage.C
A jobless person can be insured.D
There are regulations for rent.
考题
单选题Changes in pension schemes were also part of _____.A
the corporate lay-offsB
the government cuts in welfare spendingC
the economic restructuringD
the warning power of labors unions
考题
单选题According to the author, the British government is trying to ______.A
punish young people if they are not cooperating with itB
reform the unemployed youngstersC
the economic slow clownD
reduce welfare spending
考题
单选题Now about half of the women who work in social welfare are part-time, as compared to 38% in the private sector.A
guaranteeB
farewellC
well-offD
well-being
考题
单选题Which part as below don’t has direct interest in the safety of shipping and the welfare of seamen（）A
Flag StateB
Ship ownerC
Ship chandlerD
Classification society
热门标签
最新试卷
