你知道2020年考研调剂有哪几种类型吗?来了解一下!

发布时间:2020-03-05


相信许多小伙伴报考研究生都是第一次,大家知道考研调剂是什么吗?大家又知道考研调剂有几种类型吗?还不了解的小伙伴来看看吧!

考研调剂是考研考生在第一志愿没有通过自己报考学校考试,但初试成绩符合复试调剂基本分数要求但在原报考单位没有复试资格,可以申请调剂。

1、同一院系,不同专业

在同一高校的同一个院系里面,不同的专业方向由于就业前景、学习难度不同,报考的人数可能存在较大差异。因此可以选择调剂进入稍微冷门一点的专业,专业跨度不大,还有录取的优势。   

2、同一学校,不同院系   

在同一所高校内,不同院系之间虽然专业划分明显,但是一般都会有交叉的地方。所以,在这个时候我们需要先把报考院校的专业设置情况了解清楚,然后留意是否有调剂的机会和可能性。   

3、不同院校   

有些院校由于知名度、地理位置等原因,报考人数往往有限,且不能满足招生计划。这类学校也是调剂的一种选择。   

4、学硕转专硕   

学硕向专硕的调剂也是近年来比较流行的选择,尤其现在专硕学历不断得到认可,地位不断上升,小伙伴们可以考虑。

好的!以上就是51题库考试学习网为大家分享的全部内容了,希望对各位小伙伴有所帮助。如果大家还想了解更多研究生入学考试的资讯,可以随时到51题库考试学习网或相关网站查询哦!


下面小编为大家准备了 研究生入学 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

肝破裂的临床特点中,正确的是


A.腹痛和腹膜刺激征较轻
B.中央型破裂不易继发肝脓肿
C.有时可出现呕血或黑粪
D.被膜下破裂更易继发肝脓肿
答案:C
解析:

当连续刺激的时间间隔短于单收缩的时程时,可出现
A. —连串单收缩 B.不完全强直收缩 C.完全强直收缩 D.肌张力增大

答案:B,C,D
解析:
骨骼肌受到一次短促剌激时,可发生一次动作电位,随后出现一次收缩和舒张,称为单收缩。当 连续刺激的时间间隔短于单收缩的时程时,不可能出现一连串单收缩,而是出现总和,导致不完全强直收 缩或完全强直收缩。强直收缩时,肌细胞连续兴奋,使细胞内Ca2 +浓度持续升高,因此肌张力增大。

下列哪些属于抗血小板聚集和黏附的药物?


A.双嘧达莫
B.阿司匹林
C.噻氯匹定
D.双香豆素
答案:A,B,C
解析:

The European Commission's proposed tax on digital services is intended to make companies such as Google and Uber pay more.The idea is that such firms are gaming the rules at the expense of other taxpayers.The issue is real and needs to be addressed-but the answer under discussion breaks with both established international practice and plain common sense.Formal talks on the plan are due to start this week.The commission is calling for a 3 percent tax on the turnover of large digital enterprises-those with EU digital revenues over 50 million euros and total global revenues of over 750 million euros.About half the companies affected would be American,the EU estimates.The commission says it has been left with little choice.The value generated by digital companies doesn't require a physical presence,making them harder to rax.Digital businesses arrange their affairs to exploit this:They allocate income to low-tax jurisdictions and,according to officials,end up paying an effective tax of roughly 10 percent of profits,less than half of the burden carried by traditional businesses.Officials acknowledge that the right solution is a thorough overhaul of the corporate tax code,especially as it affects international firms selling digital services-and that this should be done not unilaterally but in cooperation with other countries,notably the U.S.Efforts are in fact underway,but progress has been slow,and EU officials have chosen to do something,anything,as soon as possible.Doing nothing would be better than this.For a start,the plan wouldn't raise much revenue-a meager 5 billion euros each year.And this supposedly fairer tax would bring abnormal results.For instance,companies such as Uber that don't make money will have a new cost to absorb;highly profitable firms with market power,such as Facebook,will be able to pass the tax on to their consumers.Small startups will be exempt from the new tax-unless they're acquired by larger companies.That will discourage consolidations.And the proposal as it stands may tax more activities than intended:Some financial services,for example,seem to be within its scope In its zeal to tax digital enterprises,the commission departs from many of its own stated principles.Its plan would probably require accessing individual,not just anonymized,user data.This runs counter to the EU's strict new rules on privacy,coming into force next month.Efforts to design a multinational solution need to be stepped up,not set aside.The goal should be a fair,multilateral framework that recognizes the complexity of the new digital economy while respecting the sovereignty of nations to set their own tax policy.That's an international challenge demanding an international solution.
The author's attiiude toward EU's new tax plan is one of

A.slight hesitation.
B.strong disapproval.
C.reserved consent.
D.enthusiastic support.
答案:B
解析:
文章首段即指出“欧盟数字税脱离既有国际惯例,又背离显见的常理”,随后五、六段直言“什么都不做也比施行数字税好”,指出“数字税无益于增加政府税收且会打击低利润公司、伤害消费者、阻碍企业合并、波及计划外活动,更背离其隐私新规”,最后于末段提出“应加紧努力建立多边体系”,可见,作者对“欧盟单独行动——数字税计划”的态度是“强烈反对的”,B.正确。[解题技巧]A.、C.、D.由首段②句及第三、四段信息“数字公司钻现行税法空子、致使税负不均,而国际层面上公司税改革进展缓慢”臆断出作者对欧盟数字税持“犹疑、大致赞同、甚至支持”的态度,但作者实际观点为“改革公司税法势在必行,但欧盟单方面行动不可取,应该积极推进国际解决方案”。

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。