请知悉！济宁医学院2020考研成绩查询入口及查询方式【2月20日开通】
发布时间：2020-02-13
各位小伙伴注意了，济宁医学院2020考研成绩查询入口及查询方式出来了，为了方便考生更快查询到考研成绩，为后续考研复试调剂做好准备，本文今天为大家分享“济宁医学院2020考研成绩查询入口及查询方式【2月20日开通】”相关内容，速来了解一下吧！
查询界面：
根据教育部有关文件精神，为加强新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎疫情防控工作，有效减少人员流动、聚集带来的疫情扩散风险，切实保障广大考生和考试工作人员的生命安全和身体健康，经研究决定，山东省2020年硕士研究生招生考试初试成绩于2月20日公布。有关事宜公告如下：
1.山东省2020年硕士研究生招生考试初试成绩由各招生单位于2月20日公布。届时，报考山东省招生单位的考生可根据招生单位官方网站发布的查询渠道进行成绩查询。
2.考生如对成绩有异议，要按照招生单位规定的申请时间、渠道和需提交材料等，向招生单位提出成绩复核申请。复核结果由招生单位告知考生
以上就是“济宁医学院2020考研成绩查询入口及查询方式【2月20日开通】”的全部内容了，各位考生根据自己的情况自行查阅收藏，预祝各位都能获得录取通知书，如需了解更多普通研究生入学考试的相关内容，请关注51题库考试学习网！
下面小编为大家准备了 研究生入学 的相关考题，供大家学习参考。
下列选项中，可以以权利作为客体的是（ ）。
A.占有
B.抵押
C.质押
D.留置
A.占有
B.抵押
C.质押
D.留置
答案：C
解析：
【精解】备选项中，只有质押可以以权利作为客体，故选c项。占有和抵押的客体为动产或者不动产，留置的客体仅限于动产，故排除A项、B项和D项。
请用马克思主义哲学原理,分析回答下列问题：
为什么说九方皋相马的思维方法比找到千里马具有更重要的意义？
答案：
解析：
思维方法是人们认识世界的中介；科学的思维方法是客观规律在人脑中的内化，它是人们认识世界特别是理性思维的重要工具，是实践获得成功的重要条件;方法具有普遍意义， 它比认识结果更为重要。只有掌握科学的思维方法，才能增强人的认识能力，做好各项工作。 【命题依据】
(1)辩证思维方法是人们正确进行理性思维的方法，主要有归纳和演绎、分析和综合、从 抽象上并到具体、逻辑和历史相一致等方法。其中归纳和演绎、分析和综合是形式逻辑与辩证 逻辑所共有的方法，而从抽象上升到具体、逻辑和历史相一致则是辩证思维所特有的方法
(2)现象和本质是揭示客观事物的外部表现和内部联系相互关系的范畴。现象和本质也是既对立又统一的。一方面，现象和本质是有区别的。现象是事物的外部联系和表面特征，人 们可通过感官感知，本质则是事物的内在联系和根本性质，只有靠人的理性思维才能把握；现 象是个别的、具体的，而本质是一般的、共同的；现象是多变的，本质则是相对稳定的；现象是生 动、丰富的，本质是比较深刻、单纯的。现象有真相和假象之分，假象与错觉不是一回事。假象 是客观存在，错觉是主观认识。另“方面,现象和本质又是统一的，它们相互联系、相互依存。 任何本质都是通过现象表现出来的，没有不表现为现象的本质；任何现象都从一定的方面表现 着本质，现象是本质的外部表现，即使是假象也是本质的表现。现象和本质的辩证关系表明， 正是因为现象和本质是统一的，所以我们能够通过现象认识事物的本质；同时由于现象和本质 是对立的，又要求人们不能停留于现象而必须透过现象揭示本质。人们正是通过对事物现象 的去粗取精、去伪存真、由此及彼、由表及里的认识过程，才不断深化对事物本质的‘认识。透过 现象发现本质是科学研究的任务，因为“如果事物的表现形式和事物的本质会直接合而为一， 一切科学都成为多余的了”。
(1)辩证思维方法是人们正确进行理性思维的方法，主要有归纳和演绎、分析和综合、从 抽象上并到具体、逻辑和历史相一致等方法。其中归纳和演绎、分析和综合是形式逻辑与辩证 逻辑所共有的方法，而从抽象上升到具体、逻辑和历史相一致则是辩证思维所特有的方法
(2)现象和本质是揭示客观事物的外部表现和内部联系相互关系的范畴。现象和本质也是既对立又统一的。一方面，现象和本质是有区别的。现象是事物的外部联系和表面特征，人 们可通过感官感知，本质则是事物的内在联系和根本性质，只有靠人的理性思维才能把握；现 象是个别的、具体的，而本质是一般的、共同的；现象是多变的，本质则是相对稳定的；现象是生 动、丰富的，本质是比较深刻、单纯的。现象有真相和假象之分，假象与错觉不是一回事。假象 是客观存在，错觉是主观认识。另“方面,现象和本质又是统一的，它们相互联系、相互依存。 任何本质都是通过现象表现出来的，没有不表现为现象的本质；任何现象都从一定的方面表现 着本质，现象是本质的外部表现，即使是假象也是本质的表现。现象和本质的辩证关系表明， 正是因为现象和本质是统一的，所以我们能够通过现象认识事物的本质；同时由于现象和本质 是对立的，又要求人们不能停留于现象而必须透过现象揭示本质。人们正是通过对事物现象 的去粗取精、去伪存真、由此及彼、由表及里的认识过程，才不断深化对事物本质的‘认识。透过 现象发现本质是科学研究的任务，因为“如果事物的表现形式和事物的本质会直接合而为一， 一切科学都成为多余的了”。
“The Heart of the Matter,”the just-released report by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences（AAAS）,deserves praise for affirming the importance of the humanities and social sciences to the prosperity and security of liberal democracy in America.Regrettably,however,the report’s failure to address the true nature of the crisis facing liberal education may cause more harm than good.
In 2010,leading congressional Democrats and Republicans sent letters to the AAAS asking that it identify actions that could be taken by“federal,state and local governments,universities,foundations,educators,individual benefactors and others”to“maintain national excellence in humanities and social scientific scholarship and education.”In response,the American Academy formed the Commission on the Humanities and Social Sciences.Among the commission’s 51 members are top-tier-university presidents,scholars,lawyers,judges,and business executives,as well as prominent figures from diplomacy,filmmaking,music and journalism.
The goals identified in the report are generally admirable.Because representative government presupposes an informed citizenry,the report supports full literacy;stresses the study of history and government,particularly American history and American government;and encourages the use of new digital technologies.To encourage innovation and competition,the report calls for increased investment in research,the crafting of coherent curricula that improve students’ability to solve problems and communicate effectively in the 21st century,increased funding for teachers and the encouragement of scholars to bring their learning to bear on the great challenges of the day.The report also advocates greater study of foreign languages,international affairs and the expansion of study abroad programs.
Unfortunately,despite 2?years in the making,"The Heart of the Matter"never gets to the heart of the matter:the illiberal nature of liberal education at our leading colleges and universities.The commission ignores that for several decades America's colleges and universities have produced graduates who don’t know the content and character of liberal education and are thus deprived of its benefits.Sadly,the spirit of inquiry once at home on campus has been replaced by the use of the humanities and social sciences as vehicles for publicizing“progressive,”or left-liberal propaganda.
Today,professors routinely treat the progressive interpretation of history and progressive public policy as the proper subject of study while portraying conservative or classical liberal ideas—such as free markets and self-reliance—as falling outside the boundaries of routine,and sometimes legitimate,intellectual investigation.
The AAAS displays great enthusiasm for liberal education.Yet its report may well set back reform by obscuring the depth and breadth of the challenge that Congress asked it to illuminate.
The author implies in Paragraph 5 that professors are
In 2010,leading congressional Democrats and Republicans sent letters to the AAAS asking that it identify actions that could be taken by“federal,state and local governments,universities,foundations,educators,individual benefactors and others”to“maintain national excellence in humanities and social scientific scholarship and education.”In response,the American Academy formed the Commission on the Humanities and Social Sciences.Among the commission’s 51 members are top-tier-university presidents,scholars,lawyers,judges,and business executives,as well as prominent figures from diplomacy,filmmaking,music and journalism.
The goals identified in the report are generally admirable.Because representative government presupposes an informed citizenry,the report supports full literacy;stresses the study of history and government,particularly American history and American government;and encourages the use of new digital technologies.To encourage innovation and competition,the report calls for increased investment in research,the crafting of coherent curricula that improve students’ability to solve problems and communicate effectively in the 21st century,increased funding for teachers and the encouragement of scholars to bring their learning to bear on the great challenges of the day.The report also advocates greater study of foreign languages,international affairs and the expansion of study abroad programs.
Unfortunately,despite 2?years in the making,"The Heart of the Matter"never gets to the heart of the matter:the illiberal nature of liberal education at our leading colleges and universities.The commission ignores that for several decades America's colleges and universities have produced graduates who don’t know the content and character of liberal education and are thus deprived of its benefits.Sadly,the spirit of inquiry once at home on campus has been replaced by the use of the humanities and social sciences as vehicles for publicizing“progressive,”or left-liberal propaganda.
Today,professors routinely treat the progressive interpretation of history and progressive public policy as the proper subject of study while portraying conservative or classical liberal ideas—such as free markets and self-reliance—as falling outside the boundaries of routine,and sometimes legitimate,intellectual investigation.
The AAAS displays great enthusiasm for liberal education.Yet its report may well set back reform by obscuring the depth and breadth of the challenge that Congress asked it to illuminate.
The author implies in Paragraph 5 that professors are
A.supportive of free markets
B.cautious about intellectual investigation
C.conservative about public policy
D.biased against classical liberal ideas
B.cautious about intellectual investigation
C.conservative about public policy
D.biased against classical liberal ideas
答案：B
解析：
推理判断本题考查对作者情感态度的推理判断能力。根据题干可定位到文中第五段。教授们的态度主要通过两个层面体现出来的。这两个层面体现在第五段一个由while引导的长句中，理解好这个长句是解题的关键点。while之前是一个层面，while之后是一个层面。该题主要考察while之后第二个层面的理解。在while之后讲到讲授们将保守或经典的自由理念（比如自由市场和自力更生）排除在常规之外，甚至排除在合理的学术研究之外。由作者的语气可判断出作者对教授们对待classical liberal ideas的这种做法持负向态度，比对四个选项，只有B项中的“bias”体现出了作者对教授们做法的负向态度，故为正确答案。选项A与原文态度相反，故排除；而选项C中的“cautious about”是对原文“conservative”一词理解不到位设置的干扰选项。选项D是将while前后出现的两个信息嫁接到一起，设置的不符合文意的干扰项。
《中华民国临时政府组织大纲》是下列哪一时期制定的( )
A.南京临时政府时期
B.北洋政府时期
C.南京国民政府时期
D.工农民主政权时期
B.北洋政府时期
C.南京国民政府时期
D.工农民主政权时期
答案：A
解析：
《中华民国临时政府组织大纲》是辛亥革命胜利后各省都督府代表会议通过的关于筹建中华民国临时政府的纲领性文件，于1911年12月3日通过，1912年1月2日修订，共4章21条。属于南京临时政府时期的法律。
声明：本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传，本网站不拥有所有权，未作人工编辑处理，也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容，欢迎发送邮件至：contact@51tk.com 进行举报，并提供相关证据，工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你，一经查实，本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-02-29
- 2020-04-10
- 2020-02-14
- 2020-04-07
- 2020-02-09
- 2020-02-15
- 2020-02-15
- 2020-02-18
- 2020-03-18
- 2020-02-01
- 2020-01-29
- 2020-02-16
- 2020-04-09
- 2020-07-29
- 2020-03-17
- 2020-04-04
- 2020-02-20
- 2020-02-12
- 2020-01-30
- 2020-02-05
- 2020-02-07
- 2020-02-15
- 2020-01-25
- 2020-02-15
- 2020-02-14
- 2020-04-20
- 2020-02-07
- 2020-05-13
- 2020-03-14
- 2020-02-08