北京市考生注意啦!你对ACCA了解多少呢?看了这些让你明白

发布时间:2020-01-09


2020年,目前风靡全球的ACCA证书许多人都听说过,但真正了解它的人或许是少之又少的,它是从事会计行业的会计人梦寐以求的证书,据说拿到了ACCA证书的人生活质量都得到了极大的提升,那么ACCA国际会计师到底是什么呢?它是有什么魔力让成千上万的人争相报考呢?且随51题库考试学习网一起了解一下吧。

ACCA证书是什么?

ACCA在国内被称为"国际注册会计师",是全球含金量高的财会金融领域的证书之一,在国际上的认可范围很广的财务人员资格证书。ACCA全称:英国特许公认会计师公会(The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants)。

ACCA证书的优点是什么?

他的优点分为以下几类:首先是在报名条件上门槛不高,不像国内其他类似的高级会计师一样有报考专业和工作年限的要求,它的报考并无专业限制;

其次,它的知识架构完整且基础,即便是无财会背景人士通过学习可以了解财务领域所有知识与技能;

最后,ACCA证书认可雇主皆为全球五百强企业。

拥有ACCA认证,就拥有了全球求职"通行证"

在培养方式的优势:

重视逻辑思维的培养

西方人重视考生逻辑思维,不同于国内的考试的是,在ACCA考试中,答题时需要表明个人观点与论据,并且在观点与论据中不能存在逻辑矛盾。比如分析事件内部与外部环境对它有什么影响,这些影响中哪些是可以控制的,哪些是不可以控制的,有哪些有利和不利的情况,不利的情况哪些是可以避免的,哪些是可以减少的等等。通过细分的分析,可以对一个事件有一个清晰的轮廓。

ACCA协会提倡和鼓励学员从战略角度思考问题,并且充当一位完美主义者。由于ACCA协会重在培养财务管理人才,在真实的工作岗位中,并不仅仅是需要面对会计知识领域事件,因此培养个人战略眼光是非常重要的,这也是他们的核心价值的体现。在学习过程中,从基本的逻辑分析入手,培养自己在复杂环境下的决策、判断和心理承受能力,这些能力的养成可通过教材中的大量案例的反复研究。经过一段学习之后,所影响的不仅仅是自我的知识感官,更加是生活感悟。

培养开放性思维

ACCA考试的第三阶段,判分很宽松,这就是跟国内考试最大的差别,国内考试只要跟标准答案有出入你的回答就是错误的,而对于ACCA考试而言,考生相应就有了自由表达的空间。考官提供的答案也仅仅是参考答案,只要考生的回答在逻辑关系上言之成理,内容上言之有物,且与所问的题目相关,评分的专家大笔一挥就给分了。因此,小编提醒大家,到了第三阶段,思维一定要开放,不仅可以运用本门课程所学的知识,其他课程学习的知识甚至平常积累的知识都可以搬上来,思路越开阔,写的东西越贴近论点,得分就越高。

注重积累实践经验

平时注重积累实践经验, 采用各种方式了解会计、审计、财务管理和管理信息系统的实际运转流程, 这对ACCA的备考很有帮助。同时利用这个宝贵的学习机会,可以了解到国际的会计、审计和管理知识,接受国际上的教育,使自己开阔眼界,提高素质,更好地开展审计工作。一举两得,何乐而不为呢?

看完以上的这些信息之后,相信大家对ACCA国际注册师也有了一定的了解,对此类考试感兴趣的小伙伴们可以持续关注51题库考试学习网哟~


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(b) Identify and explain the financial statement risks to be taken into account in planning the final audit.

(12 marks)

正确答案:
(b) Financial statement risks
Tutorial note: Note the timeframe. Financial statements for the year to 30 June 2006 are draft. Certain misstatements
may therefore exist due to year-end procedures not yet having taken place.
Revenue/(Receivables)
■ Revenue has increased by 11·8% ((161·5 – 144·4)/144·4 × 100). Overstatement could arise if rebates due to customers
have not yet been accounted for in full (as they are calculated in arrears). If rebates have still to be accounted for trade
receivables will be similarly overstated.
Materials expense
■ Materials expense has increased by 17·8% ((88.0 – 74·7)/74·7 × 100). This is more than the increase in revenue. This
could be legitimate (e.g. if fuel costs have increased significantly). However, the increase could indicate misclassification
of:
– revenue expenditure (see fall in other expenses below);
– capital expenditure (e.g. on overhauls or major refurbishment) as revenue;
– finance lease payments as operating lease.
Depreciation/amortisation
■ This has fallen by 10·5% ((8·5 – 9·5)/9·5 × 100). This could be valid (e.g. if Yates has significant assets already fully
depreciated or the asset base is lower since last year’s restructuring). However, there is a risk of understatement if, for
example:
– not all assets have been depreciated (or depreciated at the wrong rates, or only for 11 months of the year);
– cost of non-current assets is understated (e.g. due to failure to recognise capital expenditure)1;
– impairment losses have not been recognised (as compared with the prior year).
Tutorial note: Depreciation on vehicles and transport equipment represents only 7% of cost. If all items were being
depreciated on a straight-line basis over eight years this should be 12·5%. The depreciation on other equipment looks more
reasonable as it amounts to 14% which would be consistent with an average age of vehicles of seven years (i.e. in the middle
of the range 3 – 13 years).
Other expenses
■ These have fallen by 15·5% ((19·6 – 23·2)/23·2 × 100). They may have fallen (e.g. following the restructuring) or may be
understated due to:
– expenses being misclassified as materials expense;
– underestimation of accrued expenses (especially as the financial reporting period has not yet expired).
Intangibles
■ Intangible assets have increased by $1m (16% on the prior year). Although this may only just be material to the
financial statements as a whole (see (a)) this is the net movement, therefore additions could be material.
■ Internally-generated intangibles will be overstated if:
– any of the IAS 38 recognition criteria cannot be demonstrated;
– any impairment in the year has not yet been written off in accordance with IAS 36 ‘Impairment of Assets’.
Tangible assets
■ The net book value of property (at cost) has fallen by 5%, vehicles are virtually unchanged (increased by just 2·5%)
and other equipment (though the least material category) has fallen by 20·4%.
■ Vehicles and equipment may be overstated if:
– disposals have not been recorded;
– depreciation has been undercharged (e.g. not for a whole year);
– impairments have not yet been accounted for.
■ Understatement will arise if finance leases are treated as operating leases.
Receivables
■ Trade receivables have increased by just 2·2% (although sales increased by 11·8%) and may be understated due to a
cutoff error resulting in overstatement of cash receipts.
■ There is a risk of overstatement if sufficient allowances have not been made for the impairment of individually significant
balances and for the remainder assessed on a portfolio or group basis.
Restructuring provision
■ The restructuring provision that was made last year has fallen/been utilised by 10·2%. There is a risk of overstatement
if the provision is underutilised/not needed for the purpose for which it was established.
Finance lease liabilities
■ Although finance lease liabilities have increased (by $1m) there is a greater risk of understatement than overstatement
if leased assets are not recognised on the balance sheet (i.e. capitalised).
■ Disclosure risk arises if the requirements of IAS 17 ‘Leases’ (e.g. in respect of minimum lease payments) are not met.
Trade payables
■ These have increased by only 5·3% compared with the 17·8% increase in materials expense. There is a risk of
understatement as notifications (e.g. suppliers’ invoices) of liabilities outstanding at 30 June 2006 may have still to be
received (the month of June being an unexpired period).
Other (employee) liabilities
■ These may be understated as they have increased by only 7·5% although staff costs have increased by 14%. For
example, balances owing in respect of outstanding holiday entitlements at the year end may not yet be accurately
estimated.
Tutorial note: Credit will be given to other financial statements risks specific to the scenario. For example, ‘time-sensitive
delivery schedules’ might give rise to penalties or claims, that could result in understated provisions or undisclosed
contingent liabilities. Also, given that this is a new audit and the result has changed significantly (from loss to profit) might
suggest a risk of misstatement in the opening balances (and hence comparative information).
1 Tutorial note: This may be unlikely as other expenses have fallen also.

(b) Explain how the adoption of residual income (RI) using the annuity method of depreciation might prove to

be a superior basis for the management incentive plan operated by NCL plc.

(N.B. No illustrative calculations should be incorporated into your explanation). (4 marks)

正确答案:
(b) The use of residual income as a basis for the management incentive plan operated by NCL plc would have the following
advantages:
Divisional management would be more willing to accept a project with a positive residual income and this would contribute
to the improved performance of NCL plc. Also, the disincentive to accept a project with a positive residual income but a return
on investment regarded by divisional management as not being in their best interests would be removed, because divisional
management would be rewarded.
The use of annuity depreciation may improve performance appraisal by removing the effect of straight-line depreciation which
tends to distort project returns especially in the early years of a project’s life when invested capital remains relatively high due
to the constant depreciation charge. The residual income approach using annuity depreciation will only match the NPV if the
annual cashflows of a project are constant. Hence the method when applied to the North or South projects would produce
an NPV which does not exactly match that previously calculated. By way of contrast it is forecast that the East project will
have constant cashflows and in this instance the NPV and residual income based approach when discounted, will produce
the same result.

3 Better budgeting in recent years may have been seen as a movement from ‘incremental budgeting’ to alternative

budgeting approaches.

However, academic studies (e.g. Beyond Budgeting – Hope & Fraser) argue that the annual budget model may be

seen as (i) having a number of inherent weaknesses and (ii) acting as a barrier to the effective implementation of

alternative models for use in the accomplishment of strategic change.

Required:

(a) Identify and comment on FIVE inherent weaknesses of the annual budget model irrespective of the budgeting

approach that is applied. (8 marks)

正确答案:
(a) The weaknesses of traditional budgeting processes include the following:
– many commentators, including Hope and Fraser, contend that budgets prepared under traditional processes add little
value and require far too much valuable management time which would be better spent elsewhere.
– too heavy a reliance on the ‘agreed’ budget has an adverse impact on management behaviour which can become
dysfunctional having regard to the objectives of the organisation as a whole.
– the use of budgeting as base for communicating corporate goals, setting objectives, continuous improvement, etc is seen
as contrary to the original purpose of budgeting as a financial control mechanism.
– most budgets are not based on a rational causal model of resource consumption but are often the result of protracted
internal bargaining processes.
– conformance to budget is not seen as compatible with a drive towards continuous improvement.
– budgeting has an insufficient external focus.

(b) Explain why Oliver might legitimately feel he has a grievance against his manager and identify which aspects

of the formal disciplinary procedure David Morgan did not follow or allow in this case. (9 marks)

正确答案:
Part (b):
Oliver may feel he has a grievance as a consequence of treatment which he perceives as unfair. Proper disciplinary procedures are
essential for harmonious relationships between management and all staff. Oliver may feel that he has been singled out and that
David Morgan does not understand the need for equity in invoking disciplinary procedures.
David Morgan did not follow this procedure. No informal talk took place which might have resolved the problem, preferring to
deliver an oral warning, then moving to a written warning and dismissal. Oliver was not represented and his dismissal is likely to
lead to dissatisfaction with Oliver’s peers.
Oliver must now invoke the correct grievance procedure.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。