广西非会计专业考生能报名参加ACCA国际会计师考试吗?

发布时间:2020-01-10


众所周知,ACCA证书的含金量是十分高的,不仅仅国内认可,国际上也认可。据调查显示,目前持有ACCA证书的人尚且不多,而社会对这一部分人才的需求也是十分巨大的,因此使得越来越多的人来报考ACCA考试。目前,很多非会计专业的同学,比如金融专业和管理专业的同学这些专业可以报考吗?51题库考试学习网为大家一一解答这些问题:

ACCA考试是一个系统性的学习体系,在报名条件上奉行宽进严出的准则,对于中国考生来说,有机会从零基础开始阶梯性学习,最终成为一个具备高端财务技能和职业操守的综合性人才,并胜任跨国集团的各类高级财务岗位。那么大家先看看报考条件是什么呢?

报考国际注册会计师的条件有哪些?

报名国际注册会计师ACCA考试,具备以下条件之一即可:

1)凡具有教育部承认的大专以上学历,即可报名成为ACCA的正式学员;

2)教育部认可的高等院校在校生,顺利完成大一的课程考试,即可报名成为ACCA的正式学员;

3)未符合1、2项报名资格的16周岁以上的申请者,也可以先申请参加FIA(Foundations in Accountancy)基础财务资格考试。在完成基础商业会计(FAB)、基础管理会计(FMA)、基础财务会计(FFA)3门课程,并完成ACCA基础职业模块,可获得ACCA商业会计师资格证书(Diploma in Accounting and Business),资格证书后可豁免ACCAF1-F3三门课程的考试,直接进入技能课程的考试。

一直以来,ACCA都以培养国际性的高级会计、财务管理专家著称,其高质量的课程设计,高标准的考试要求,不仅赢得了联合国和各大国际性组织的高度评价,更为众多跨国公司和专业机构所推崇。

可以说参加ACCA课程学习,不但可以让学员充分地掌握专业的会计技能,更能学到更多的高级财务管理知识,帮助他们更好地胜任高级财务管理者岗位。

综上所述,报考ACCA考试是没有专业限制的,只需要学历达到专科及以上就可以了(自考本科的也算哦,但是需要有一定的工作年限才可以)

看完这些,各位萌新们是不是更加了解ACCA考试了呢?51题库考试学习网在这里提醒一下大家:2020年3月份即将迎来ACCA新的一季考试,有参加的ACCAer们就建议大家可以开始着手准备复习了哦;俗话说,机会是留给有准备的人的,早点备考多学一些知识才能去攻克更多的困难。最后,51题库考试学习网预祝大家考试通过,成功上岸,ACCAer们,加油~


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(ii) consignment inventory; and (3 marks)

正确答案:
(ii) Consignment inventory
■ Agree terms of sale to dealers to confirm the ‘principal – agent’ relationship between Pavia and dealers.
■ Inspect proforma invoices for vehicles sent on consignment to dealers to confirm number of vehicles with dealers
at the year end.
■ Obtain direct confirmation from dealers of vehicles unsold at the year end.
■ Physically inspect vehicles sold on consignment before the year end that are returned unsold by dealers after the
year end (if any) for evidence of impairment.
■ Perform. cutoff tests on sales to dealers/trade receivables/vehicle inventory.
■ If goods on consignment are treated as inventory agree their unit costs to be the same as for other vehicles in
inventory.

5 (a) IFAC’s ‘Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants’ is divided into three parts:

Part A – Applicable to All Professional Accountants

Part B – Applicable to Professional Accountants in Public Practice

Part C – Applicable to Employed Professional Accountants

Required:

Distinguish between ‘Professional Accountants’, ‘Professional Accountants in Public Practice’ and ‘Employed

Professional Accountants’. (3 marks)

正确答案:
5 BOLEYN & CO
(a) Professional Accountants
■ Professional Accountants are members of an IFAC member body. They may be:
– in public practice or employed professionals;
– a sole practitioner, partnership or corporate body.
■ Professional Accountants in Public Practice (‘practitioners’) are:
– each partner (or person occupying a position similar to that of a partner); and
– each employee in a practice providing professional services to a client irrespective of their functional classification
(e.g. audit, tax or consulting); and
– professional accountants in a practice having managerial responsibilities.
This term is also used to refer to a firm of professional accountants in public practice.
■ Employed Professional Accountants are professional accountants employed in industry, commerce, the public sector or
education.

(b) (i) Explain the matters you should consider to determine whether capitalised development costs are

appropriately recognised; and (5 marks)

正确答案:
(b) (i) Materiality
The net book value of capitalised development costs represent 7% of total assets in 2007 (2006 – 7·7%), and is
therefore material. The net book value has increased by 13%, a significant trend.
The costs capitalised during the year amount to $750,000. If it was found that the development cost had been
inappropriately capitalised, the cost should instead have been expensed. This would reduce profit before tax by
$750,000, representing 42% of the year’s profit. This is highly material. It is therefore essential to gather sufficient
evidence to support the assertion that development costs should be recognised as an asset.
In 2007, $750,000 capitalised development costs have been incurred, when added to $160,000 research costs
expensed, total research and development costs are $910,000 which represents 20·2% of total revenue, again
indicating a high level of materiality for this class of transaction.
Relevant accounting standard
Development costs should only be capitalised as an intangible asset if the recognition criteria of IAS 38 Intangible Assets
have been demonstrated in full:
– Intention to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it
– Technical feasibility and ability to use or sell
– Ability to generate future economic benefit
– Availability of technical, financial and other resources to complete
– Ability to measure the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset.
Research costs must be expensed, as should development costs which do not comply with the above criteria. The
auditors must consider how Sci-Tech Co differentiates between research and development costs.
There is risk that not all of the criteria have been demonstrated, especially due to the subjective nature of the
development itself:
– Pharmaceutical development is highly regulated. If the government does not license the product then the product
cannot be sold, and economic benefits will therefore not be received.
– Market research should justify the commercial viability of the product. The launch of a rival product to Flortex
means that market share is likely to be much lower than anticipated, and the ability to sell Flortex is reduced. This
could mean that Flortex will not generate an overall economic benefit if future sales will not recover the research
and development costs already suffered, and yet to be suffered, prior to launch. The existence of the rival product
could indicate that Flortex is no longer commercially viable, in which case the capitalised development costs
relating to Flortex should be immediately expensed.
– The funding on which development is dependent may be withdrawn, indicating that there are not adequate
resources to complete the development of the products. Sci-Tech has failed to meet one of its required key
performance indicators (KPI) in the year ended 30 November 2007, as products valued at 0·8% revenue have
been donated to charity, whereas the required KPI is 1% revenue.
Given that there is currently a breach of the target KPIs, this is likely to result in funding equivalent to 25% of
research and development expenditure being withdrawn. If Sci-Tech Co is unable to source alternative means of
finance, then it would seem that adequate resources may not be available to complete the development of new
products.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。